Treatment of Symptomatic Lumbar Internal Disc Disruption (IDD) With the Biostat® Disc Augmentation System: A Pilot Study
A Multicenter Pilot Study of Resorbable Biologic Disc Augmentation for Treatment of Symptomatic Lumbar Internal Disc Disruption (IDD) With the Biostat® Disc Augmentation System
1 other identifier
interventional
15
1 country
3
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to assess the safety of the Biostat Disc Augmentation System for the treatment of chronic low-back (lumbar) pain due to symptomatic internal disc disruptions (IDD) and to obtain preliminary efficacy information.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable low-back-pain
Started Jun 2008
Longer than P75 for not_applicable low-back-pain
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2008
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 4, 2008
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 9, 2008
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2009
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
April 29, 2010
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2011
CompletedJune 22, 2015
May 1, 2015
8 months
June 4, 2008
March 8, 2010
May 26, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Numbers and Types of Adverse Events (Only Number of Events is Reported in This Section - See Adverse Events Section for Further Detail)
The primary outcome for this safety study includes the number and types of adverse events reported in the study. The data fields in this section do not allow for reporting all aspects of this outcome (i.e., the number of adverse events, as well as the types of event). These numbers were entered and are reported in the adverse event section of the Results.
104 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Visual Analog Scale for Low-back Pain
Baseline, 26-weeks (primary endpoint), 52-weeks, 104-weeks
Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire
Baseline, 26-weeks (primary endpoint), 52-weeks, 104-weeks
Study Arms (1)
Biostat® Disc Augmentation System
EXPERIMENTALDelivery of Biostat BIOLOGX® Fibrin Sealant with the Biostat Delivery Device
Interventions
Delivery of Biostat BIOLOGX® Fibrin Sealant with the Biostat Delivery Device
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age 18-75 (inclusive) and skeletally mature.
- Voluntarily signs the subject informed consent form and agrees to the release of medical information for purposes of this study (HIPAA authorization).
- Physically and mentally able to comply with the protocol, including ability to read and complete required forms, and willing and able to adhere to the follow-up requirements of the protocol.
- Low-back pain for at least 6 months.
- Pretreatment baseline low-back pain of at least 40 mm on a 100 mm visual analog scale.
- Referred leg pain, if present, is of noncompressive origin and there are no clinical findings of radiculopathy.
- Low-back pain is greater than leg pain (if present) as measured on a visual analog scale. If bilateral leg pain, back pain is greater than worst leg pain.
- Low-back pain unresponsive to at least 6 weeks of nonoperative treatment, which may include bed rest, antiinflammatory and analgesic medications, chiropractic manipulations, acupuncture, massage, physical therapy or home-directed lumbar exercise program.
- Negative response to diagnostic medial branch block or facet joint injection.
- No sustained relief with epidural injection of corticosteroids.
- Diagnosis of symptomatic lumbar (L1/L2-L5/S1) internal disc disruption (IDD), which requires confirmation of discogenic pain at one or two contiguous levels through positive provocation discography performed using pressure manometry and identification of an adjacent normal disc. The disc provocation studies must precisely demonstrate concordant pain (\<50 psi above opening pressure) and must demonstrate a fissure(s) in the outer one-third of the posterior or lateral anulus.
You may not qualify if:
- Cauda equina syndrome.
- Active malignancy or tumor as source of symptoms.
- Infection at the planned procedure site or active systemic infection.
- Previous lumbar spine surgery.
- Previous disc invasive treatment procedures at the affected level(s) (e.g., intradiscal electrothermal therapy, intradiscal radiofrequency thermocoagulation) in the past 12 months or intradiscal corticosteroid injection within the past 3 months.
- Evidence of prior lumbar vertebral body fracture or trauma.
- Disc bulge/protrusion at the symptomatic level(s) \> 4 mm.
- Presence of disc extrusion or sequestration.
- Clinical findings of lumbosacral motor or sensory radiculopathy.
- Leg pain is greater than low-back pain as measured on a visual analog scale.
- Lumbar intervertebral foramen stenosis at the affected level(s) resulting in significant spinal nerve root compression or impingement.
- Symptomatic central vertebral canal stenosis or absolute sagittal vertebral canal diameter \< 9mm.
- Loss of disc space height at the symptomatic level(s) greater than one-third of an adjacent normal disc (or of the expected height in the case of an L5-S1 disc).
- Spondylolisthesis (≥ Grade 1) with or without spondylolysis at the symptomatic level(s).
- Lumbar spondylitis or other undifferentiated spondyloarthropathy.
- +19 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (3)
Unknown Facility
Bethesda, Maryland, 20814, United States
Unknown Facility
Tyler, Texas, 75701, United States
Unknown Facility
Bellingham, Washington, 98226, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Jeff F. Doerzbacher
- Organization
- Spinal Restoration, Inc.
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Kevin J Pauza, MD
Spine Specialists, PA
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- GT60
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 4, 2008
First Posted
June 9, 2008
Study Start
June 1, 2008
Primary Completion
February 1, 2009
Study Completion
January 1, 2011
Last Updated
June 22, 2015
Results First Posted
April 29, 2010
Record last verified: 2015-05