NCT00690326

Brief Summary

The marked discrepancy between predicted and actual prevalence of Type2 diabetes Mellitus (DM) with the actual cases rising earlier than expected, underscore the continuing relevance of tailored awareness and management strategies including physical activity(PA) to combat growing diabetes pandemic. Research is needed to develop effective programs that promote PA among female patients.Design\& Method randomized controlled trial . 86 females 30 -65 years with type 2 DM attended Diabetic Clinic out patient at government tertiary care hospital,Kerala, south India from May to October 2006 including one week pilot study, participant selection, random allocation and intervention. Block randomized to intervention(43) and control(43) groups. Intervention-'Behavioral change communication model, including 30 mints 'PA promotion video',pamphlet and last week recall and report of PA using an interview schedule for 4 consecutive visits. measures- Total PA/day calculated in calorie from METs(metabolic equivalent score) , HbA1C, Total knowledge score, stage of change of behavior, the baseline PA under four domains in Metabolic Equivalent Task Score by interview using IPAQ(International Physiclal Activity Questionnaire) long form, body weight, occupation and source of water. Physical activity recommendations according to Centres for Disease Control and Prevention Atlanta guide lines-

  1. 1.talk test-One who is on a moderate intensity level should be able to carry on a conversation comfortable while engagement in the activity.
  2. 2.Vigorous intensity PA \>6.5METs-Person will not be able to carry out conversation. running, aerobics for 20 mins

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
86

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2006

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 2, 2006

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 1, 2006

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 1, 2006

Completed
1.7 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 2, 2008

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 4, 2008

Completed
17.9 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

April 15, 2026

Completed
Last Updated

April 15, 2026

Status Verified

April 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

3 months

First QC Date

June 2, 2008

Results QC Date

November 14, 2025

Last Update Submit

April 12, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

physical activityDiabetes Mellitus type2Behavioral change communicationHousehold physical activityFemale Diabetic patients

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Total Physical Activity Log Means and Geometric Means With Standard Deviation in Intervention and Control Groups After Intervention.

    Occupational PA,House hold PA and transportation PA are calculated.They are added together and divided with number of days involved to calculate total physical activity in calory/day.Log transformation of data done.Higher value means better effectiveness of BCC.minimum 150 and maximum 374

    After 4 months trial period

  • Domains of Total Physical Activity(Calories/Day) After Intervention in Intervention Group and Control Group

    After intervention, total physical activity in calories/day calculated by adding domains.Total PA=house hold physical activity+transportation PA+occupational PA+leisure time PA.Physical activity measured in minutes and then converted into metabolic equivalent task- score (MET score) using a "standardised" PA questionnaire for moderate \& heavy physical activity for 1 week and calculated average for one day by dividing with number of active days.Sedentary activity measure two MET, light PA=3.5 MET.moderate PA= 4 to 6.5 MET are measured under four domains of PA and is converted into caloric expenditure using formula 0.0175 Kcal x MET of specific activity x body Weight. METS of specific activity is given by Compendium of physical activities- minimum zero calories and maximum 374.81 calories.Higher score means better outcome, better physically active due to effectiveness of intervention

    at the end of 4 months-October

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Glycosylated Haemoglobin(HbA1c)

    At the end of 4 months

Other Outcomes (1)

  • Number of Participants in Pre Contemplation and Action Stages in Intervention& Control Groups After Intervention

    after 4 months

Study Arms (2)

Intervention group

EXPERIMENTAL

intervention for experimental arm : 'Behavioral change communication model' including a physical activity promotion video(30 explains showing how to be physical active in daily routines of life to control blood sugar) , pamphlet-'Physical Activity(PA) to control Diabetes Mellitus' and last week recall and report of PA using IPAQ-international questionnaire long form. Followed up for 4 months by 4 consecutive visits when video show repeated . Video content- PA is scientifically proved to be effective in controlling diabetes mellitus and preventing long term complications of diabetes mellitus. 30 mints. continuous / 10 mints. intermittent brisk walks with a short gap in between - for 5 days is recommended. Incorporate into daily life as occupational, household, transportation and leisure time PA. Carry water from well, scrub the floor with hands while on knee and hands, walk by getting down in the previous bus stop, use staircase, walk briskly swinging both hands.

Behavioral: Behavioral change communication model(BCC) to promote physical activity

control group

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

Participants of control group were distributed with placebo, the " printed pamphlets " physical activity to control Diabetes Mellitus.Followed up for 4 months by 4 consecutive visits in diabetic clinic OP. Measured each time their physical activity by last week recall and report of PA using IPAQ-international physical activity questionnaire and to report any adverse events related physical activity.

Other: pamphlet-The printed pamphlet,'Physical activity:To control blood sugar/ Diabetes Mellitus'

Interventions

Behavioral change communication is to promote physical activity among females with type2 diabetes mellitus of age 30 to 65 attending Diabetic clinic of a government hospital in south India.'Behavioral change communication model, including 30 mints 'PA promotion video', printed pamphlet-physical activity to control Diabetes Mellitus were given.Followed up by last week recall and report of PA using IPAQ-international questionnaire for 4 visits in 4 consecutive months.video show repeated each visit.

Also known as: pamphlet, placebo
Intervention group

Control group participants were given only the printed pamphlets as placebo and followed up by last week recall and report of PA using (IPAQ-international questionnaire) for 4 visits in 4 consecutive months. content of pamphlet- Physical activity has got equal importance as drugs and diet management in the treatment of diabetes mellitus. Diabetic patients should be aware of ABC HbA1C below7, B- BP control and C-Cholesterol control as recommended by ADA (American Diabetes Association). Physical Activity help to achieve these three. Physical activity decreases insulin resistance and increases the effectiveness of anti-diabetic drugs. Small tips to improve physical activity .Walk at least 15 minutes by getting down in the prevision bus stop. Use staircase instead of lift. Walk briskly swinging both hands) with a speed at which you sweat and heart rate raised to a level at which you can still talk comfortably.Do household works and gardening manually.

Also known as: pamphlet, placebo
control group

Eligibility Criteria

Age30 Years - 65 Years
Sexfemale(Gender-based eligibility)
Gender Eligibility DetailsFemales aged 30 to 65 years with Diabetes Mellitus type 2 attending diabetic clinic Out Patient clinic at Diabetic Clinic OP
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • females 30to 65yrs. with type-2 Diabetes Mellitus.
  • Attending Diabetic clinic at a tertiary level hospital(medical college Thiruvananthapuram)
  • on oral hypoglycemics

You may not qualify if:

  • only one patient from one family
  • H/o myocardial infarction
  • nephropathy
  • autonomic neuropathy
  • severe limiting osteo arthritis
  • pregnancy
  • Mental incompetence

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Diabetic clinic,Thiruvananthapuram medical college hospital

Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, 695011, India

Location

Related Publications (22)

  • Herrmann SD, Willis EA, Ainsworth BE. The 2024 Compendium of Physical Activities and its expansion. J Sport Health Sci. 2024 Jan;13(1):1-2. doi: 10.1016/j.jshs.2023.09.008. No abstract available.

    PMID: 38242592BACKGROUND
  • Mohan V, Shanthirani CS, Deepa M, Datta M, Williams OD, Deepa R. Community empowerment--a successful model for prevention of non-communicable diseases in India--the Chennai Urban Population Study (CUPS-17). J Assoc Physicians India. 2006 Nov;54:858-62.

  • LaMonte MJ, Blair SN, Church TS. Physical activity and diabetes prevention. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2005 Sep;99(3):1205-13. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00193.2005.

  • Raman Kutty V, Joseph A, Soman CR. High prevalence of type 2 diabetes in an urban settlement in Kerala, India. Ethn Health. 1999 Nov;4(4):231-9. doi: 10.1080/13557859998010.

  • Anjana RM, Unnikrishnan R, Deepa M, Pradeepa R, Tandon N, Das AK, Joshi S, Bajaj S, Jabbar PK, Das HK, Kumar A, Dhandhania VK, Bhansali A, Rao PV, Desai A, Kalra S, Gupta A, Lakshmy R, Madhu SV, Elangovan N, Chowdhury S, Venkatesan U, Subashini R, Kaur T, Dhaliwal RS, Mohan V; ICMR-INDIAB Collaborative Study Group. Metabolic non-communicable disease health report of India: the ICMR-INDIAB national cross-sectional study (ICMR-INDIAB-17). Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2023 Jul;11(7):474-489. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(23)00119-5. Epub 2023 Jun 7.

  • Sun H, Saeedi P, Karuranga S, Pinkepank M, Ogurtsova K, Duncan BB, Stein C, Basit A, Chan JCN, Mbanya JC, Pavkov ME, Ramachandaran A, Wild SH, James S, Herman WH, Zhang P, Bommer C, Kuo S, Boyko EJ, Magliano DJ. IDF Diabetes Atlas: Global, regional and country-level diabetes prevalence estimates for 2021 and projections for 2045. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2022 Jan;183:109119. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2021.109119. Epub 2021 Dec 6.

  • S., Kevin & Gorstein, Jonathan. (2005). Division of Nutrition and Physical Activity National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion Centers for Disease Control and Prevention USA.

    RESULT
  • Pate RR, Pratt M, Blair SN, Haskell WL, Macera CA, Bouchard C, Buchner D, Ettinger W, Heath GW, King AC, et al. Physical activity and public health. A recommendation from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the American College of Sports Medicine. JAMA. 1995 Feb 1;273(5):402-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.273.5.402.

  • Richter EA, Ruderman NB, Schneider SH. Diabetes and exercise. Am J Med. 1981 Jan;70(1):201-9. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(81)90427-7.

  • van Sluijs EM, van Poppel MN, Stalman WA, van Mechelen W. Feasibility and acceptability of a physical activity promotion programme in general practice. Fam Pract. 2004 Aug;21(4):429-36. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmh414.

  • A Ramachandran.Epidemiology of Diabetes in Indians. J. DIAB. DEV. COUNTRIES (1993), VOL. 13

    RESULT
  • Irwin ML, Mayer-Davis EJ, Addy CL, Pate RR, Durstine JL, Stolarczyk LM, Ainsworth BE. Moderate-intensity physical activity and fasting insulin levels in women: the Cross-Cultural Activity Participation Study. Diabetes Care. 2000 Apr;23(4):449-54. doi: 10.2337/diacare.23.4.449.

  • Hu FB, Sigal RJ, Rich-Edwards JW, Colditz GA, Solomon CG, Willett WC, Speizer FE, Manson JE. Walking compared with vigorous physical activity and risk of type 2 diabetes in women: a prospective study. JAMA. 1999 Oct 20;282(15):1433-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.282.15.1433.

  • Kahn EB, Ramsey LT, Brownson RC, Heath GW, Howze EH, Powell KE, Stone EJ, Rajab MW, Corso P. The effectiveness of interventions to increase physical activity. A systematic review. Am J Prev Med. 2002 May;22(4 Suppl):73-107. doi: 10.1016/s0749-3797(02)00434-8.

  • Albright A, Franz M, Hornsby G, Kriska A, Marrero D, Ullrich I, Verity LS. American College of Sports Medicine position stand. Exercise and type 2 diabetes. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000 Jul;32(7):1345-60. doi: 10.1097/00005768-200007000-00024.

  • Hardman AE. Physical activity and health: current issues and research needs. Int J Epidemiol. 2001 Oct;30(5):1193-7. doi: 10.1093/ije/30.5.1193. No abstract available.

  • Ainsworth BE, Haskell WL, Whitt MC, Irwin ML, Swartz AM, Strath SJ, O'Brien WL, Bassett DR Jr, Schmitz KH, Emplaincourt PO, Jacobs DR Jr, Leon AS. Compendium of physical activities: an update of activity codes and MET intensities. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000 Sep;32(9 Suppl):S498-504. doi: 10.1097/00005768-200009001-00009.

  • Patel A, Edwards TC, Jones G, Liddle AD, Cobb J, Garner A. Metabolic equivalent of task scores avoid the ceiling effect observed with conventional patient-reported outcome scores following knee arthroplasty. Bone Jt Open. 2023 Mar 1;4(3):129-137. doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.43.BJO-2022-0119.R1.

  • Wani RT. Socioeconomic status scales-modified Kuppuswamy and Udai Pareekh's scale updated for 2019. J Family Med Prim Care. 2019 Jun;8(6):1846-1849. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_288_19.

  • Sharma R. Revised Kuppuswamy's Socioeconomic Status Scale: Explained and Updated. Indian Pediatr. 2017 Oct 15;54(10):867-870. Epub 2017 Aug 26.

  • pacompendium.com

    RESULT
  • Hagstromer M, Oja P, Sjostrom M. The International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ): a study of concurrent and construct validity. Public Health Nutr. 2006 Sep;9(6):755-62. doi: 10.1079/phn2005898.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Sedentary BehaviorMotor Activity

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Behavior

Limitations and Caveats

We could have continued intervention for longer period and monitored dose of oral hypoglycemics and body weight.The time limit allowed for the study was the main constraint.

Results Point of Contact

Title
Dr.Ramdas Pisharody
Organization
Clinical Epidemiology Research and Training Centre,Medical College,Thiruvananthapuram,India

Study Officials

  • Rose D Chakkola, MD MPhil

    CERTC-Clinical epidemiology research&training centre,Trivandrum medical college

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Assistant professor in Physiology ,Govt medical college,Kerala.MPhil in Clinical epidemiology student

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 2, 2008

First Posted

June 4, 2008

Study Start

July 2, 2006

Primary Completion

October 1, 2006

Study Completion

October 1, 2006

Last Updated

April 15, 2026

Results First Posted

April 15, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-04

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

It is patient data, submitted to the university as part of fulfilment of degree

Locations