A Randomized Clinical Study Comparing a Fully-Coated Cementless Stem Versus a Cemented Stem for Total Hip Replacements
1 other identifier
interventional
48
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to answer the question as to whether or not a fully coated cementless stem is equal to or better than a cemented stem in patients over 72 years with good bone quality.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_4
Started Jul 1998
Longer than P75 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 1998
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 30, 2008
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 4, 2008
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2009
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2009
CompletedFebruary 16, 2012
May 1, 2008
11.3 years
May 30, 2008
February 15, 2012
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Revision
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Womac
SF-12
Study Arms (2)
Fully Coated Prodigy Stem (AML)
ACTIVE COMPARATORTotal hip arthroplasty with fully coated prodigy stem (AML)
Cemented Endurance Hip Stem
ACTIVE COMPARATORTotal hip arthroplasty with cemented Endurance hip stem component
Interventions
Total hip arthroplasty with fully coated Prodigy stem
total hip arthroplasty with cemented endurance stem
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adult patients undergoing surgery for total hip replacements, including diagnosis of osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, traumatic and post-traumatic arthritis, avascular necrosis and congenital dislocation of the hip. Congenital dislocation of the hip will be included where small but anatomical acetabuli are present, ie., the acetabuli located near the tear-drop
- Revisions of failed osteotomies may be included
- Bone quality felt to be acceptable to the surgeon for cementless arthroplasty preoperatively in patients \> 72 years of age
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with active infection
- Revision cemented total hip replacement
- Charcot joints
- Patients with primary or secondary bone tumors in the vicinity of the joint to be replaced
- C.D.H. with abnormally placed acetabuli or femoral canals
- Fibromyalgia patients
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
QEII Health Sciences Centre
Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3H 3A7, Canada
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ross K Leighton, MD, FRCS(C)
Capital Health, Canada
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 30, 2008
First Posted
June 4, 2008
Study Start
July 1, 1998
Primary Completion
November 1, 2009
Study Completion
November 1, 2009
Last Updated
February 16, 2012
Record last verified: 2008-05