Evaluating Predictors & Interventions in Sphincter of Oddi Dysfunction
EPISOD
A Phase III Randomized Multicenter Clinical Trial of Sphincterotomy for the Treatment of SOD III Patients
2 other identifiers
interventional
214
1 country
7
Brief Summary
The Evaluating Predictors \& Interventions in Sphincter of Oddi Dysfunction(SOD) study (EPISOD) is a randomized sham-controlled study of biliary and pancreatic sphincterotomy as treatment for patients with pain after cholecystectomy fitting the criteria for sphincter of Oddi dysfunction type III.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jul 2008
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
7 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 30, 2008
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 3, 2008
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2008
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2013
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
July 28, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2016
CompletedApril 19, 2018
March 1, 2018
5.4 years
May 30, 2008
April 13, 2015
March 20, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Percentage of Participants With Success
The primary outcome was a dichotomous (success/failure) variable. Success was defined as patients having a RAPID score of \<6 days at months 9 and 12 post-procedure, without re-intervention and without use of prescription analgesics during months 10, 11 and 12 unless used for non-abdominal pain for no more than 14 days. The subject was considered a failure if the 12-month RAPID score was missing or collected outside the acceptable window. If the 9-month RAPID was missing, or outside of the window, then the 6-month value was used when available.
1 year
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Percentage of Patients With a Successful Primary Outcome, Out of Those With Abnormal Sphincter Manometry.
1 year
Study Arms (2)
1.ERCP with sphincterotomy
ACTIVE COMPARATORERCP with sphincterotomy: cutting the biliary sphincter muscle (sphincterotomy)
2.ERCP without sphincterotomy
PLACEBO COMPARATORERCP without cutting the biliary sphincter muscle (sphincterotomy)
Interventions
cutting the biliary sphincter muscle (sphincterotomy)
ERCP with sphincter manometry, but no sphincterotomy
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients diagnosed with the clinical syndrome of SOD, as defined by the Modified Functional Biliary Disorders Module of the Rome III criteria
- Pain burden of Grade 3 or higher on RAPID Questionnaire.
- Cholecystectomy more than 90 days before enrollment.
- Laboratory Tests: Results of blood tests taken within 1 week preceding the baseline visit and any others available from the preceding 6 months (post-cholecystectomy):Direct bilirubin, alkaline phosphatase, amylase and lipase results must be no greater than 2 X the upper level of normal.Transaminase levels can be no more than 3 X upper limit of normal. If the transaminases are elevated (\<2X ULN) in association with a pain attack, they cannot have returned to normal within 3 days.
- Normal abdominal imaging by CT or MR/MRCP with bile duct reported at ≤9mm.
- Upper endoscopy examination without findings to explain the pain.
- Pain persisting despite a one trial of acid suppressant medications for one month (if tolerated).
- Pain persisting despite a trial of antispasmodics.
- Subjects on antidepressants for pain control (not required) should be taking them for a minimum of one month prior to the baseline assessment.
- Patients with SOD with depressive and/or anxiety disorders who receive psychopharmacologic treatment must be on stable medication dose for at least 6 weeks.
- Access to a telephone. 11.Must be able to speak, read, and write English. 12.Signed and dated informed consent.
You may not qualify if:
- Prior ERCP treatment.
- Age \< 18 or Age \> 65.
- Pregnancy: Women who are pregnant at the time of Screening\* will be excluded from the study. (\*Note: Women who become pregnant AFTER the Baseline Visit/ERCP will be allowed to remain in the study for telephone follow-up visits).
- Prior gastric resection or surgery involving biliary diversion.
- Prior diagnosis of acute pancreatitis (lipase \>3 x ULN) including post-ERCP pancreatitis, or of chronic pancreatitis by radiological imaging, EUS 5 or more criteria, or Cambridge criteria moderate or more on ERCP.
- Daily use of prescription analgesics over the previous month.
- Abdominal discomfort every day for the past month at level of 3 or more on a scale of 1-10.
- Presence of significant psychiatric disorders:
- Lifetime psychotic disorders, bipolar disorder;
- Substance use disorders within 6 months;
- Eating disorders within 2 years
- Moderate \& severe depression defined by BDI-II (Beck Depression Inventory) cutoff scores \>22 (unless receiving stable psychiatric therapy for six weeks); and/or,
- Suicidal risk (equal to or greater than "low") using MINI suicide section or a score of greater than 0 on question 9 of the BDI.
- The total number of days in the previous 3 months that the subject has taken prescription analgesics due to episodes of abdominal pain is greater than the total number of days the subject had episodes of abdominal pain.
- Any condition that, in the investigator's opinion, makes the subject unsuitable for study participation.
- +4 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (7)
Yale University
New Haven, Connecticut, 06510, United States
Indiana University
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202, United States
University of Minnesota
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55415, United States
Midwest Therapeutic Endoscopy Consultants
St Louis, Missouri, 63141, United States
Medical University of South Carolina Digestive Disease Center
Charleston, South Carolina, 29425, United States
Methodist Dallas Medical Center
Dallas, Texas, 75203, United States
Virginia Mason Medical Center
Seattle, Washington, 98101, United States
Related Publications (4)
Yaghoobi M, Pauls Q, Durkalski V, Romagnuolo J, Fogel EL, Tarnasky PR, Aliperti G, Freeman ML, Kozarek RA, Jamidar PA, Wilcox CM, Elta GH, Hawes RH, Wood-Williams A, Cotton PB. Incidence and predictors of post-ERCP pancreatitis in patients with suspected sphincter of Oddi dysfunction undergoing biliary or dual sphincterotomy: results from the EPISOD prospective multicenter randomized sham-controlled study. Endoscopy. 2015 Oct;47(10):884-90. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1392418. Epub 2015 Jul 10.
PMID: 26165739DERIVEDCotton PB, Durkalski V, Romagnuolo J, Pauls Q, Fogel E, Tarnasky P, Aliperti G, Freeman M, Kozarek R, Jamidar P, Wilcox M, Serrano J, Brawman-Mintzer O, Elta G, Mauldin P, Thornhill A, Hawes R, Wood-Williams A, Orrell K, Drossman D, Robuck P. Effect of endoscopic sphincterotomy for suspected sphincter of Oddi dysfunction on pain-related disability following cholecystectomy: the EPISOD randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2014 May;311(20):2101-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.5220.
PMID: 24867013DERIVEDRomagnuolo J, Cotton PB, Durkalski V, Pauls Q, Brawman-Mintzer O, Drossman DA, Mauldin P, Orrell K, Williams AW, Fogel EL, Tarnasky PR, Aliperti G, Freeman ML, Kozarek RA, Jamidar PA, Wilcox CM, Serrano J, Elta GH. Can patient and pain characteristics predict manometric sphincter of Oddi dysfunction in patients with clinically suspected sphincter of Oddi dysfunction? Gastrointest Endosc. 2014 May;79(5):765-72. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2013.11.037. Epub 2014 Jan 25.
PMID: 24472759DERIVEDCotton PB, Durkalski V, Orrell KB, Brawman-Mintzer O, Drossman DA, Wilcox CM, Mauldin PD, Elta GH, Tarnasky PR, Fogel EL, Jagganath SB, Kozarek RA, Freeman ML, Romagnuolo J, Robuck PR. Challenges in planning and initiating a randomized clinical study of sphincter of Oddi dysfunction. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Nov;72(5):986-91. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.08.022.
PMID: 21034899DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr Peter Cotton
- Organization
- Medical University of South Carolina
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Joseph Romagnuolo, MD
Medical Universtiy of South Carolina
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Martin Freeman, MD
University of Minnesota
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Richard Kozarek, MD
Virginia Mason Medical Center
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Evan Fogel, MD
Indiana University
- STUDY CHAIR
Peter Cotton, MD
MUSC Digestive Disease Center
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Paul Tarnasky, MD
Digestive Health Associates of Texas
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Giuseppe Aliperti, MD
Midwest Therapeutic Endoscopy Consultants
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Priya Jamidar, MD
Yale University
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Jose Serrano
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Study Chair
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 30, 2008
First Posted
June 3, 2008
Study Start
July 1, 2008
Primary Completion
December 1, 2013
Study Completion
December 1, 2016
Last Updated
April 19, 2018
Results First Posted
July 28, 2016
Record last verified: 2018-03