NCT00684125

Brief Summary

The incidence of pericardial effusion and late cardiac tamponade after aortic and valvular surgery is higher than after other cardiac surgical procedures. The aim of this study is to evaluate the clinical safety and efficacy of prolonged mediastinal drainage using small, soft silastic drains (Blake drain, Ethicon USA) versus conventional mediastinal drainage using large chest tubes. A prospective randomized trial.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
150

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2008

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 21, 2008

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 26, 2008

Completed
6 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 1, 2008

Completed
1.9 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 1, 2010

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 1, 2010

Completed
Last Updated

July 22, 2011

Status Verified

July 1, 2011

Enrollment Period

1.9 years

First QC Date

May 21, 2008

Last Update Submit

July 21, 2011

Conditions

Keywords

late cardiac tamponade

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Any pericardial effusion of 15 mm or more as measured on postoperative transthoracic echocardiogram on day 5 and late cardiac tamponade requiring surgical reintervention.

    Day 5 - post surgery

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Total volume of mediastinal drainage. Pain intensity on postoperative days 1 to 5. Incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation Drain-associated infection or any other drain-associated adverse event.

    Days 1 or till discharge - post surgery

Study Arms (2)

1

EXPERIMENTAL

mediastinal drainage will be accomplished using a 28F or 32F chest tube in the anterior mediastinum and a 19F Blake drain located in the posterior pericardial cavity.

Device: Blake Drains (Blake drain, Ethicon USA)

2

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

mediastinal drainage will be accomplished using two 28F or 32F chest tubes located in the anterior mediastinum.

Device: Standard mediastinal drainage

Interventions

19F Blake drain located in the posterior pericardial cavity

Also known as: Blake drain: prolonged mediastinal drainage
1

Mediastinal drainage will be accomplished using 28F or 32F chest tube located in the anterior mediastinum

Also known as: mediastinal drainage
2

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 90 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients aged between 18 and 90 years old, undergoing either surgery of the ascending and/or transverse aorta, or surgery of the mitral and/or aortic valves

You may not qualify if:

  • Emergency surgery
  • Unavailability for follow-up at the Montreal Heart Institute

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Montreal Heart Institute

Montreal, Quebec, H1T 1C8, Canada

Location

Related Publications (7)

  • Eryilmaz S, Emiroglu O, Eyileten Z, Akar R, Yazicioglu L, Tasoz R, Kaya B, Uysalel A, Ucanok K, Corapcioglu T, Ozyurda U. Effect of posterior pericardial drainage on the incidence of pericardial effusion after ascending aortic surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006 Jul;132(1):27-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2006.01.049.

    PMID: 16798298BACKGROUND
  • Agati S, Mignosa C, Gitto P, Trimarchi ES, Ciccarello G, Salvo D, Trimarchi G. A method for chest drainage after pediatric cardiac surgery: a prospective randomized trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006 Jun;131(6):1306-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2006.02.013.

    PMID: 16733162BACKGROUND
  • Ege T, Tatli E, Canbaz S, Cikirikcioglu M, Sunar H, Ozalp B, Duran E. The importance of intrapericardial drain selection in cardiac surgery. Chest. 2004 Nov;126(5):1559-62. doi: 10.1378/chest.126.5.1559.

    PMID: 15539727BACKGROUND
  • Obney JA, Barnes MJ, Lisagor PG, Cohen DJ. A method for mediastinal drainage after cardiac procedures using small silastic drains. Ann Thorac Surg. 2000 Sep;70(3):1109-10. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(00)01800-2.

    PMID: 11016389BACKGROUND
  • Kuvin JT, Harati NA, Pandian NG, Bojar RM, Khabbaz KR. Postoperative cardiac tamponade in the modern surgical era. Ann Thorac Surg. 2002 Oct;74(4):1148-53. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(02)03837-7.

    PMID: 12400760BACKGROUND
  • Shah A, van den Brink A, de Mol B. Raised international normalized ratio: an early warning for a late cardiac tamponade? Ann Thorac Surg. 2006 Sep;82(3):1090-1. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2006.01.035.

    PMID: 16928545BACKGROUND
  • Moss E, Miller CS, Jensen H, Basmadjian A, Bouchard D, Carrier M, Perrault LP, Cartier R, Pellerin M, Demers P. A randomized trial of early versus delayed mediastinal drain removal after cardiac surgery using silastic and conventional tubes. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2013 Jul;17(1):110-5. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivt123.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Pericardial Effusion

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Heart DiseasesCardiovascular Diseases

Study Officials

  • Phillippe Demers, MD

    Montreal Heart Institute

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 21, 2008

First Posted

May 26, 2008

Study Start

June 1, 2008

Primary Completion

May 1, 2010

Study Completion

July 1, 2010

Last Updated

July 22, 2011

Record last verified: 2011-07

Locations