Ultrasound Guided Embryo Transfer: Abdominal Versus Transvaginal, a RCT
Abdominal Versus Transvaginal Ultrasound Guided Embryo Transfer: Results of a Randomized Clinical Trial
5 other identifiers
observational
224
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Ultrasound (US) guided embryo transfer (ET) appears to improve pregnancy outcomes in IVF-ET. Most reports are done using a transabdominal (TAS) approach, in contrast to a transvaginal ultrasound (TVS) which does not require a full bladder. We sought to determine if either approach was better with respect to clinical outcomes.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Aug 2003
Longer than P75 for all trials
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2003
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2007
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2007
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 16, 2008
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 22, 2008
CompletedOctober 5, 2015
May 1, 2008
3.8 years
May 16, 2008
October 1, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
pregnancy rates for TAS and TVS ultrasound-guided ET groups
August 2003 to June 2007
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Length of time required for embryo transfer
August 2003 to June 2007
differences between transferring physicians
August 2003 to June 2007
multiple pregnancies
August 2003 to June 2007
ectopic pregnancy rates
August 2003 to June 2007
Study Arms (2)
1
transabdominal ultrasound (TAS) guided embryo transfer
2
transvaginal ultrasound (TVS) guided embryo transfer
Eligibility Criteria
Patients undergoing assisted reproductive cycles at the University of Wisconsin REI Program
You may qualify if:
- \- All patients undergoing assisted reproductive cycles including autologous IVF, oocyte donation, and frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles
You may not qualify if:
- \- Cases of severe ovarian hyper-stimulation requiring embryo cryopreservation and gestational surrogate cycles
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Steven R Lindheim, MD, MMM
Fertility Specialists Medical Group
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE CONTROL
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 16, 2008
First Posted
May 22, 2008
Study Start
August 1, 2003
Primary Completion
June 1, 2007
Study Completion
June 1, 2007
Last Updated
October 5, 2015
Record last verified: 2008-05