Changes in Heart Rate in Response to Cold Pressor Test
HRVW1
1 other identifier
observational
20
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Abstract: Pain, a subjective sensation, has been increasingly studied, as it has been recognized as an important factor in patients' recovery and quality of life. Pain is charted today as one of the vital signs. For standardization, pain is charted by a number from 0 to 10 indicating its level. The most common practiced pain assessment tool today is the VAS- Visual Analog Score (facial or numerical), by which the patient himself indicates the level of the pain he or she endures. It has been found that the correlation between the reported pain by the patient and the assessed pain by the caregivers or the medical personnel becomes poor as pain intensifies. Objective assessment of anesthesia using the heart rate and its spectral analyses was done in the past. By using this modality, works on neonatal pain were conducted. In adults, works have shown that there is possibility to assess pain using this modality, though no repeated proof for its ability to detect pain was published. We know that physiological signals such as ECG consist of mixtures of variety of patterns and phenomena accruing at different patterns and time points. Traditional analysis methods are designed and optimized to handle signals that include a single class of patterns such as pure harmonics or piece-wise constant functions. However, such basic operations that use a single representation method usually yield mediocre results when applied to real complex biological signals as ECG and EEG especially in the case where the Signal to Noise Ratio (SNR) is very low. Recent trends in digital signal processing (DSP) use the novel idea of merging several different representation methods to create a so called over-complete dictionary, examples of this approach include the Matching Pursuit algorithm and the Basis Pursuit algorithm. We intend to develop and apply the novel signal processing tools to the ECG signals during painful experience for the first time. We believe that such tools have the potential to provide much better insight of the signal basic components and their relation to pain.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for all trials
Started May 2008
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2008
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 13, 2008
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 15, 2008
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2008
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2008
CompletedSeptember 21, 2010
September 1, 2010
5 months
May 13, 2008
September 19, 2010
Conditions
Keywords
Eligibility Criteria
healthy volunteers
You may qualify if:
- healthy volunteers age 20-40
You may not qualify if:
- Heart diseases Hypertension Cardiovascular medication Neurological diseases
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Soroka University Medical Center
Beersheba, Negev, Israel
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Zvia Rudich, MD
Soroka UMC
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE CONTROL
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 13, 2008
First Posted
May 15, 2008
Study Start
May 1, 2008
Primary Completion
October 1, 2008
Study Completion
October 1, 2008
Last Updated
September 21, 2010
Record last verified: 2010-09