A Placebo-Controlled Study for SPM 962 in Restless Legs Syndrome (RLS) Patients
1 other identifier
interventional
230
1 country
8
Brief Summary
The primary objective of this study is to investigate efficacy and safety of SPM 962 in Japanese RLS patients in a multi-center, placebo-controlled double-blind parrallel group comparative study following once-daily multiple transdermal doses of SPM 962 within a range of 2.25 to 6.75 mg/day. Recommended maintainance dose range is also to be investigated.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_2
Started Jun 2008
Shorter than P25 for phase_2
8 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 23, 2008
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 25, 2008
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2008
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2009
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2009
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
April 25, 2014
CompletedApril 25, 2014
March 1, 2014
1.2 years
April 23, 2008
February 3, 2014
March 26, 2014
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change of International Restless Legs Syndrome Study Group Rating Scale (IRLS) Score From the Baseline to the End of Titration/Maintenance Period
IRLS is a scale for assessing severity of restless legs syndrome symptoms. IRLS consists of ten questions. Each question is scored from 4 for the first (top) answer (usually 'very severe') to 0 for the last answer (usually none). The sum of the score of each question serves as the scale score. The scale scoring criteria are: Mild (score 1-10); Moderate (score 11-20); Severe (score 21-30); Very severe (score 31-40). A decrease in the scores means improvement.
Baseline, end of maintenance period at 6 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Severity
Baseline, 2 weeks, 4 weeks and 6 weeks. The data at 6 weeks after dosing is shown.
Patient Global Impression (PGI) Improvement
Baseline, 4 weeks and 6 weeks. The data at 6 weeks after dosing is shown.
The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)
Baseline, every two weeks
Medical Outcome Study (MOS) Short-Form 36-Item Health Survey (SF-36)
Baseline, every two weeks
IRLS Each Parameter
Baseline, every two weeks
Study Arms (4)
1
PLACEBO COMPARATORinactive placebo
2
EXPERIMENTAL2.25 mg first week: 2.25 mg 1 sheet plus placebo 1 sheet 2nd to 6th week :2.25mg 1 sheet plus placebo 2 sheets
3
EXPERIMENTAL4.5 mg/body first week : 2.25 mg 2 sheets 2nd to 6th week : 2.25 mg 2 sheets pus placebo 1 sheet
4
EXPERIMENTAL6.75 mg/body first week : 2.25 mg 2 sheets 2nd to 6th week : 2.25 mg 3sheets
Interventions
transdermal application, 1 time per day, 0-6.75 mg/body, titration, 6weeks
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Subject is 20 and more and less than 80 years of age and is able to think about her/his participation at the time of informed consent.
- Subject meets the diagnosis of idiopathic RLS based on the 4 cardinal clinical features according to the IRLSSG/NIH.
- The following subject will be included in the study
- Subject is not currently receiving treatment for RLS.
- Subject has previously received treatment of either L-dopa or dopamine agonists and efficacy was observed in either of drugs.
- At baseline, subject has a score of ≧ 15 on the IRLS sum score and RLS symptoms occur twice and more a week (≧score 2 in IRLS Question 7)
- Subject has a score of ≧ 4 on the CGI Severity score at baseline
You may not qualify if:
- Subject has secondary RLS in association with renal impairment such as uremia,iron deficiency anemia, and drug associated symptoms.
- Subject has, is suspected of having or has a history of sleep disorders such as sleep apnea syndrome, narcolepsy, sleep attacks/sudden onset of sleep.
- Subject has additional clinically relevant concomitant diseases or symptoms such as polyneuropathy (including diabetic neuropathy), akathisia,claudication varicoses,muscle fasciculation,painful legs moving toes and radiculopathy.
- Subject has other central nervous diseases like Parkinson's disease, dimentia, progressive supranuclear paresis, multisystem atrophy, Huntington's Chorea, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, or Alzheimer's disease.
- At screening or baseline, subject has psychiatric condition like confusion, hallucination, delusion, excitation, deliria, abnormal behaviour.
- Subject has orthostatic hypotension or systolic BP marks ≦ 100 mm Hg and with a decrease of BP from supine to standing position of ≧ 30 mm Hg.
- Subject has a history of epilepsy, convulsion etc.
- Subject has serious cardiac dysfunction and/or arrhythmias (e.g., congestive heart failure Class III or IV by NYHA, myocardial infarction, angina pectoris, conduction system dysregulations, second or third degree AV block, complete left bundle branch block, sick-sinus-syndrome, ventricular fibrillation within twelve months prior to enrollment).
- Subject has arrhythmia and receiving Class Ia antiarrhythmic drugs(e.g., quinidine, procainamide), Class III antiarrhythmic drugs (e.g., amiodarone, sotalol)
- At screening and baseline, subject develops serious ECG abnormality. Subjects has QTc-interval \>450 msec twice at screening. Subject has a the average QTc-interval from two ECGs \>450 msec in males and \>470 msec in females at baseline.
- Subject has long QT syndrome congenital.
- Subject has a serum potassium level \< 3.5 mEq/L at screening.
- Subject has a total bilirubin ≧3.0 mg/dL or AST(GOT) and/or ALT(GPT) greater than 2.5 times the upper limit of the reference range (or ≧100 IU/L) at screening.
- Subject has BUN ≧ 30 mg/dL or serum creatinine ≧2.0 mg/dl at screening.
- Subject has a history of allergic reaction to topical agents such as transdermal patch.
- +6 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (8)
Unknown Facility
Chubu Region, Japan
Unknown Facility
Chugoku Region, Japan
Unknown Facility
Hokkaido Region, Japan
Unknown Facility
Kanto Region, Japan
Unknown Facility
Kinki Region, Japan
Unknown Facility
Kyushu Region, Japan
Unknown Facility
Shikoku Region, Japan
Unknown Facility
Tohoku Region, Japan
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Director of Clinical Research and Development
- Organization
- Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Katsuhisa Saito
New Product Evaluation Development
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 23, 2008
First Posted
April 25, 2008
Study Start
June 1, 2008
Primary Completion
August 1, 2009
Study Completion
August 1, 2009
Last Updated
April 25, 2014
Results First Posted
April 25, 2014
Record last verified: 2014-03