Palonosetron and Hydroxyzine to Reduce Opioid Withdrawal
Examination of Palonosetron and Hydroxyzine Pre-treatment as a Possible Method to Reduce the Objective Signs of Experimentally-induced Acute Opioid Withdrawal in Humans: a Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled Crossover Study
1 other identifier
interventional
10
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Opioid medications are commonly used for pain relief. When given over time, physical dependence can occur. This results in unpleasant side effects--such as agitation and nausea--if opioid medications are suddenly stopped. We are interested in knowing if a medication named Ondansetron can help ease or prevent symptoms associated with opioid withdrawal. We are also interested in knowing if a similar (but more potent FDA-approved drug, palonosetron) can more effectively treat withdrawal symptoms with or without combination with an antihistamine called hydroxyzine (vistaril).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2008
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2008
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 15, 2008
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 18, 2008
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2008
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2008
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
June 5, 2017
CompletedJune 5, 2017
April 1, 2017
4 months
April 15, 2008
February 8, 2016
April 25, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
OOWS Score
The OOWS is a 13-item instrument documenting physically observable signs of withdrawal, which are rated as present (1) or absent (0) during the observation period. Maximum score possible = 13, minimum score possible = 0. T=15 minutes post naloxone administration coordinates with T = 180 (min) for the entire study session. OOWS scores at T=180 is the primary outcome measure of the study compared with baseline OOWS scores at T=-30 (30 minutes prior to study medication administration). Reported time frames are in relation to time past since administration of study medications. Mean post-Naloxone OOWS scores (+/- SEM) were determined for pretreatment groups
Change from baseline in OOWS score at 180 minutes (15 minutes post naloxone administration)
Secondary Outcomes (1)
SOWS Score
Change from baseline in SOWS score at 180 minutes (15 minutes post naloxone administration)
Study Arms (6)
Sequence 1: Placebo, Combo, Palonosetron
EXPERIMENTALAt T = 0 (minutes), healthy (non-opioid dependent, non-substance abuser) male volunteers (N=10) were pre-treated with either placebo (0.9% normal saline), palonosetron IV (0.75mg), or palonosetron IV (0.75mg) and hydroxyzine per os (PO) (100mg) in a crossover study design. This was followed at T = 30 by intravenous morphine (10mg/70kg). At T = 165, 10mg/70kg naloxone IV was given to precipitate opioid withdrawal. The objective opioid withdrawal score (OOWS) and subjective opioid withdrawal score (SOWS) were determined 5 and 15 minutes after naloxone administration (T = 170, 180, respectively). Baseline measurements were recorded at T = -30 and T = -15. Week 1: Placebo Week 2: Palonosetron + Hydroxyzine Combo Week 3: Palonosetron
Sequence 2: Palonosetron, Combo, Placebo
EXPERIMENTALAt T = 0 (minutes), healthy (non-opioid dependent, non-substance abuser) male volunteers (N=10) were pre-treated with either placebo (0.9% normal saline), palonosetron IV (0.75mg), or palonosetron IV (0.75mg) and hydroxyzine per os (PO) (100mg) in a crossover study design. This was followed at T = 30 by intravenous morphine (10mg/70kg). At T = 165, 10mg/70kg naloxone IV was given to precipitate opioid withdrawal. The objective opioid withdrawal score (OOWS) and subjective opioid withdrawal score (SOWS) were determined 5 and 15 minutes after naloxone administration (T = 170, 180, respectively). Baseline measurements were recorded at T = -30 and T = -15. Week 1: Palonosetron Week 2: Palonosetron + Hydroxyzine Combo Week 3: Placebo
Sequence 3: Combo, Placebo, Palonosetron
EXPERIMENTALAt T = 0 (minutes), healthy (non-opioid dependent, non-substance abuser) male volunteers (N=10) were pre-treated with either placebo (0.9% normal saline), palonosetron IV (0.75mg), or palonosetron IV (0.75mg) and hydroxyzine per os (PO) (100mg) in a crossover study design. This was followed at T = 30 by intravenous morphine (10mg/70kg). At T = 165, 10mg/70kg naloxone IV was given to precipitate opioid withdrawal. The objective opioid withdrawal score (OOWS) and subjective opioid withdrawal score (SOWS) were determined 5 and 15 minutes after naloxone administration (T = 170, 180, respectively). Baseline measurements were recorded at T = -30 and T = -15. Week 1: Palonosetron + Hydroxyzine Combo Week 2: Placebo Week 3: Palonosetron
Sequence 4: Placebo, Palonosetron, Combo
EXPERIMENTALAt T = 0 (minutes), healthy (non-opioid dependent, non-substance abuser) male volunteers (N=10) were pre-treated with either placebo (0.9% normal saline), palonosetron IV (0.75mg), or palonosetron IV (0.75mg) and hydroxyzine per os (PO) (100mg) in a crossover study design. This was followed at T = 30 by intravenous morphine (10mg/70kg). At T = 165, 10mg/70kg naloxone IV was given to precipitate opioid withdrawal. The objective opioid withdrawal score (OOWS) and subjective opioid withdrawal score (SOWS) were determined 5 and 15 minutes after naloxone administration (T = 170, 180, respectively). Baseline measurements were recorded at T = -30 and T = -15. Week 1: Placebo Week 2: Palonosetron only Week 3: Palonosetron + Hydroxyzine Combo
Sequence 5: Combo, Palonosetron, Placebo
EXPERIMENTALAt T = 0 (minutes), healthy (non-opioid dependent, non-substance abuser) male volunteers (N=10) were pre-treated with either placebo (0.9% normal saline), palonosetron IV (0.75mg), or palonosetron IV (0.75mg) and hydroxyzine per os (PO) (100mg) in a crossover study design. This was followed at T = 30 by intravenous morphine (10mg/70kg). At T = 165, 10mg/70kg naloxone IV was given to precipitate opioid withdrawal. The objective opioid withdrawal score (OOWS) and subjective opioid withdrawal score (SOWS) were determined 5 and 15 minutes after naloxone administration (T = 170, 180, respectively). Baseline measurements were recorded at T = -30 and T = -15. Week 1: Palonosetron + Hydroxyzine Combo Week 2: Palonosetron only Week 3: Placebo
Sequence 6: Palonosetron, Placebo, Combo
EXPERIMENTALAt T = 0 (minutes), healthy (non-opioid dependent, non-substance abuser) male volunteers (N=10) were pre-treated with either placebo (0.9% normal saline), palonosetron IV (0.75mg), or palonosetron IV (0.75mg) and hydroxyzine per os (PO) (100mg) in a crossover study design. This was followed at T = 30 by intravenous morphine (10mg/70kg). At T = 165, 10mg/70kg naloxone IV was given to precipitate opioid withdrawal. The objective opioid withdrawal score (OOWS) and subjective opioid withdrawal score (SOWS) were determined 5 and 15 minutes after naloxone administration (T = 170, 180, respectively). Baseline measurements were recorded at T = -30 and T = -15. Week 1: Palonosetron only Week 2: Placebo Week 3:Palonosetron + Hydroxyzine Combo
Interventions
Over 3 study visits, patients will receive one of the following treatment regimens: * Placebo saline IV and sugar pill * 0.75 mg Palonosetron IV and sugar pill * 0.75 mg Palonosetron IV and 100 mg hydroxyzine PO
Over 3 study visits, patients will receive one of the following treatment regimens: * Placebo saline IV and sugar pill * 0.75 mg Palonosetron IV and sugar pill * 0.75 mg Palonosetron IV and 100 mg hydroxyzine PO
Over 3 study visits, patients will receive one of the following treatment regimens: * Placebo saline IV and sugar pill * 0.75 mg Palonosetron IV and sugar pill * 0.75 mg Palonosetron IV and 100 mg hydroxyzine PO
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Healthy males
- Ages 18-35
- No allergies to morphine or palonosetron
- No history of addiction or substance abuse
You may not qualify if:
- Female
- Younger than 18 or older than 35
- History of substance abuse
- Raynaud's disease or coronary artery disease
- Allergies to morphine or palonosetron
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Stanford University School of Medicine
Stanford, California, 94305, United States
Related Publications (33)
Committee on Advancing Pain Research Care and Education, Board on Health Sciences Policy, Institute of Medicine. A call for cultural transformation of attitudes toward pain and its prevention and management. J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother. 2011;25(4):365-9. doi: 10.3109/15360288.2011.621516.
PMID: 22126167BACKGROUNDKuehn BM. Opioid prescriptions soar: increase in legitimate use as well as abuse. JAMA. 2007 Jan 17;297(3):249-51. doi: 10.1001/jama.297.3.249. No abstract available.
PMID: 17227967BACKGROUNDManchikanti L, Helm S 2nd, Fellows B, Janata JW, Pampati V, Grider JS, Boswell MV. Opioid epidemic in the United States. Pain Physician. 2012 Jul;15(3 Suppl):ES9-38.
PMID: 22786464BACKGROUNDKobinger W, Walland A. Investigations into the mechanism of the hypotensive effect of 2-(2,6-dichlorphenylamino)-2-imidazoline-HCl. Eur J Pharmacol. 1967 Dec;2(3):155-62. doi: 10.1016/0014-2999(67)90080-5. No abstract available.
PMID: 5626889BACKGROUNDChu LF, Liang DY, Li X, Sahbaie P, D'arcy N, Liao G, Peltz G, David Clark J. From mouse to man: the 5-HT3 receptor modulates physical dependence on opioid narcotics. Pharmacogenet Genomics. 2009 Mar;19(3):193-205. doi: 10.1097/FPC.0b013e328322e73d.
PMID: 19214139BACKGROUNDCostall B, Jones BJ, Kelly ME, Naylor RJ, Onaivi ES, Tyers MB. Sites of action of ondansetron to inhibit withdrawal from drugs of abuse. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1990 May;36(1):97-104. doi: 10.1016/0091-3057(90)90132-2.
PMID: 2140900BACKGROUNDGulati A, Bhargava HN. Brain and spinal cord 5-HT2 receptors of morphine-tolerant-dependent and -abstinent rats. Eur J Pharmacol. 1989 Aug 22;167(2):185-92. doi: 10.1016/0014-2999(89)90578-5.
PMID: 2591474BACKGROUNDTao R, Ma Z, Auerbach SB. Alteration in regulation of serotonin release in rat dorsal raphe nucleus after prolonged exposure to morphine. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1998 Jul;286(1):481-8.
PMID: 9655893BACKGROUNDIngram SL, Vaughan CW, Bagley EE, Connor M, Christie MJ. Enhanced opioid efficacy in opioid dependence is caused by an altered signal transduction pathway. J Neurosci. 1998 Dec 15;18(24):10269-76. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.18-24-10269.1998.
PMID: 9852564BACKGROUNDTao R, Auerbach SB. Involvement of the dorsal raphe but not median raphe nucleus in morphine-induced increases in serotonin release in the rat forebrain. Neuroscience. 1995 Sep;68(2):553-61. doi: 10.1016/0306-4522(95)00154-b.
PMID: 7477965BACKGROUNDPinelli A, Trivulzio S, Tomasoni L. Effects of ondansetron administration on opioid withdrawal syndrome observed in rats. Eur J Pharmacol. 1997 Dec 11;340(2-3):111-9. doi: 10.1016/s0014-2999(97)01349-6.
PMID: 9537805BACKGROUNDSmith HS, Cox LR, Smith EJ. 5-HT3 receptor antagonists for the treatment of nausea/vomiting. Ann Palliat Med. 2012 Jul;1(2):115-20. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2224-5820.2012.07.07.
PMID: 25841471BACKGROUNDCompton P, Miotto K, Elashoff D. Precipitated opioid withdrawal across acute physical dependence induction methods. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2004 Feb;77(2):263-8. doi: 10.1016/j.pbb.2003.10.017.
PMID: 14751453BACKGROUNDGrunberg SM, Koeller JM. Palonosetron: a unique 5-HT3-receptor antagonist for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced emesis. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2003 Dec;4(12):2297-303. doi: 10.1517/14656566.4.12.2297.
PMID: 14640928BACKGROUNDMustian KM, Devine K, Ryan JL, Janelsins MC, Sprod LK, Peppone LJ, Candelario GD, Mohile SG, Morrow GR. Treatment of Nausea and Vomiting During Chemotherapy. US Oncol Hematol. 2011;7(2):91-97. doi: 10.17925/ohr.2011.07.2.91.
PMID: 24466408BACKGROUNDSmith HS, Laufer A. Opioid induced nausea and vomiting. Eur J Pharmacol. 2014 Jan 5;722:67-78. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2013.09.074. Epub 2013 Oct 21.
PMID: 24157979BACKGROUNDMazurkiewicz-Kwilecki IM, Bielkiewicz B. The effects of chronic morphine treatment on histamine concentration and histidine decarboxylase activity in rat brain. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol. 1978;2(1):93-9. doi: 10.1016/0364-7722(78)90027-9. No abstract available.
PMID: 569343BACKGROUNDWong CL, Roberts MB. The possible role of brain histamine and H1 and H2 receptors in the development of morphine tolerance and physical dependence in mice. Agents Actions. 1975 Dec;5(5):476-83. doi: 10.1007/BF01972684.
PMID: 1241224BACKGROUNDWong CL, Roberts MB. The effects of L-histidine and of specific histamine receptor agonists, on the expression of morphine tolerance and physical dependence in mice. Agents Actions. 1976 Sep;6(5):569-76. doi: 10.1007/BF01971571.
PMID: 987696BACKGROUNDHoehe M. Influence of the menstrual cycle on neuroendocrine and behavioral responses to an opiate agonist in humans: preliminary results. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 1988;13(4):339-44. doi: 10.1016/0306-4530(88)90059-5.
PMID: 2852375BACKGROUNDHandelsman L, Cochrane KJ, Aronson MJ, Ness R, Rubinstein KJ, Kanof PD. Two new rating scales for opiate withdrawal. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 1987;13(3):293-308. doi: 10.3109/00952998709001515.
PMID: 3687892BACKGROUNDAlsaadi SM, McAuley JH, Hush JM, Lo S, Lin CW, Williams CM, Maher CG. Poor sleep quality is strongly associated with subsequent pain intensity in patients with acute low back pain. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2014 May;66(5):1388-94. doi: 10.1002/art.38329.
PMID: 24782195BACKGROUNDSchuh-Hofer S, Wodarski R, Pfau DB, Caspani O, Magerl W, Kennedy JD, Treede RD. One night of total sleep deprivation promotes a state of generalized hyperalgesia: a surrogate pain model to study the relationship of insomnia and pain. Pain. 2013 Sep;154(9):1613-1621. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2013.04.046. Epub 2013 May 11.
PMID: 23707287BACKGROUNDDe Leon A. Palonosetron (Aloxi): a second-generation 5-HT(3) receptor antagonist for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2006 Oct;19(4):413-6. doi: 10.1080/08998280.2006.11928210.
PMID: 17106506BACKGROUNDBoon JH, Hopkins D. Hydroxyzine premedication--does it provide better anxiolysis than a placebo? S Afr Med J. 1996 Jun;86(6):661-4.
PMID: 8764421BACKGROUNDRoychoudhury M, Kulkarni SK. Prevention of morphine discontinuation phenomenon in mice by ondansetron, a selective 5-HT3 antagonist. Methods Find Exp Clin Pharmacol. 1996 Dec;18(10):677-83.
PMID: 9121224BACKGROUNDCui R, Suemaru K, Li B, Kohnomi S, Araki H. Tropisetron attenuates naloxone-induced place aversion in single-dose morphine-treated rats: role of alpha7 nicotinic receptors. Eur J Pharmacol. 2009 May 1;609(1-3):74-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2008.12.051. Epub 2009 Jan 17.
PMID: 19374878BACKGROUNDAraki H, Kawakami KY, Jin C, Suemaru K, Kitamura Y, Nagata M, Futagami K, Shibata K, Kawasaki H, Gomita Y. Nicotine attenuates place aversion induced by naloxone in single-dose, morphine-treated rats. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2004 Feb;171(4):398-404. doi: 10.1007/s00213-003-1595-7. Epub 2003 Sep 10.
PMID: 13680070BACKGROUNDMotoshima S, Suemaru K, Kawasaki Y, Jin C, Kawasaki H, Gomita Y, Araki H. Effects of alpha4beta2 and alpha7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor antagonists on place aversion induced by naloxone in single-dose morphine-treated rats. Eur J Pharmacol. 2005 Sep 5;519(1-2):91-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2005.06.050.
PMID: 16098507BACKGROUNDMaricq AV, Peterson AS, Brake AJ, Myers RM, Julius D. Primary structure and functional expression of the 5HT3 receptor, a serotonin-gated ion channel. Science. 1991 Oct 18;254(5030):432-7. doi: 10.1126/science.1718042.
PMID: 1718042BACKGROUNDAlbertson TE, Chenoweth J, Ford J, Owen K, Sutter ME. Is it prime time for alpha2-adrenocepter agonists in the treatment of withdrawal syndromes? J Med Toxicol. 2014 Dec;10(4):369-81. doi: 10.1007/s13181-014-0430-3.
PMID: 25238670BACKGROUNDWalsh SL, Strain EC, Bigelow GE. Evaluation of the effects of lofexidine and clonidine on naloxone-precipitated withdrawal in opioid-dependent humans. Addiction. 2003 Apr;98(4):427-39. doi: 10.1046/j.1360-0443.2003.00372.x.
PMID: 12653813BACKGROUNDErlendson MJ, D'Arcy N, Encisco EM, Yu JJ, Rincon-Cruz L, Peltz G, Clark JD, Chu LF. Palonosetron and hydroxyzine pre-treatment reduces the objective signs of experimentally-induced acute opioid withdrawal in humans: a double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled crossover study. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2017 Jan;43(1):78-86. doi: 10.1080/00952990.2016.1210614. Epub 2016 Aug 11.
PMID: 27712113DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Results are not necessarily generalizable to patients with chronic opioid exposure.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Larry Chu
- Organization
- Stanford University School of Medicine
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Dr Larry Fu-nien Chu
Stanford University
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor of Anesthesia
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 15, 2008
First Posted
April 18, 2008
Study Start
April 1, 2008
Primary Completion
August 1, 2008
Study Completion
August 1, 2008
Last Updated
June 5, 2017
Results First Posted
June 5, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share