NCT00659724

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to collect information on the ease of use and thrombogenicity of the Polyflux HD-C4 Big and Fresenius Optiflux 180NR or 200NR dialyzers under conditions of routine clinical use for hemodialysis.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
33

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2008

Shorter than P25 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

2 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 1, 2008

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 14, 2008

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 16, 2008

Completed
15 days until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 1, 2008

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 1, 2008

Completed
3.2 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

June 27, 2011

Completed
Last Updated

July 24, 2025

Status Verified

July 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

2 months

First QC Date

April 14, 2008

Results QC Date

March 7, 2011

Last Update Submit

July 3, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

Dialyzer

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (5)

  • Ease of Use: Priming Blood Side

    For every study treatment/dialyzer, the nursing staff rated the ease of priming blood side as follows: Very Easy:Air is easily removed without knocking or clamping procedures. Acceptable:Knocking and/or clamping required for efficient air removal. Difficult:Knocking and/or clamping and additional volume of saline or extended recirculation needed to remove air. Very Difficult:Air could not be removed.

    Priming at each treatment

  • Ease of Use: Priming Dialysate Side

    For every study treatment/dialyzer, the nursing staff rated the ease of priming dialysate side as follows: Dialysate Side at 500 ml Priming Volume (check one): Perfect: No air visible. Acceptable: Some air visible, but considered insignificant. Not Acceptable: Additional actions needed to sufficiently remove air.

    Priming at each treatment

  • Dialyzer Assessment: Fiber Condition

    For every study treatment/dialyzer, the nursing staff rated the condition of the dialyzer fibers after rinse-back as follows: Very Good:All fibers appear white. Good:Few fibers (less than 10) appear PINK / RED. (check one) Poor:Several fibers (more than 10) appear PINK / RED. (check one) Very Poor:Most fibers (more than 75%) appear PINK / RED. (check one)

    Each treatment: assessment of the condition of the dialyzer fibers after rinse-back

  • Dialyzer Assessment: Arterial Header Condition

    For every study treatment/dialyzer, the nursing staff rated the condition of the arterial header after rinse-back as follows: Very Good:Surface as clean as expected. Good:Distinct red ring appears at the dialyzer wall. Poor:Significant appearance of clots, randomly distributed on the surface. Very Poor:Completely red and/or covered with clots.

    Each treatment: assessment of the condition of the arterial header after rinse-back

  • Dialyzer Assessment: Venous Header Condition

    For every study treatment/dialyzer, the nursing staff rated the condition of the venous header after rinse-back as follows: Very Good:Surface as clean as expected. Good:Distinct red ring appears at the dialyzer wall. Poor:Significant appearance of clots, randomly distributed on the surface. Very Poor:Completely red and/or covered with clots.

    Each treatment: the assessment of the condition of the venous header after rinse-back

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Assessment of dialyzer ease of use and thrombogenicity assessments following routine dialysis therapy of 33 adult patients (18 years of age or older)

You may qualify if:

  • Hemodialysis patients 18 years of age or older

You may not qualify if:

  • n/a

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

Advanced Dialysis Center of Easton

Easton, Maryland, 21601, United States

Location

Advanced Dialysis Center of Potomac

Arlington, Virginia, 22202-2714, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Kidney Failure, Chronic

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Renal Insufficiency, ChronicRenal InsufficiencyKidney DiseasesUrologic DiseasesFemale Urogenital DiseasesFemale Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy ComplicationsUrogenital DiseasesMale Urogenital DiseasesChronic DiseaseDisease AttributesPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Results Point of Contact

Title
Global CORP Clinical Trials Disclosure
Organization
Vantive

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
OTHER
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 14, 2008

First Posted

April 16, 2008

Study Start

March 1, 2008

Primary Completion

May 1, 2008

Study Completion

May 1, 2008

Last Updated

July 24, 2025

Results First Posted

June 27, 2011

Record last verified: 2025-07

Locations