A Study To Assess The Ability Of A Crossover Study Design To Detect The Efficacy Of Pregabalin In Post-Traumatic Neuropathic Pain Patients
Methodology Study To Assess The Ability Of A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Two Period Crossover Study To Detect The Effect Of Pregabalin In Post-Traumatic Neuropathic Pain Patients
1 other identifier
interventional
25
2 countries
5
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to assess whether a cross-over type study design in post-traumatic neuropathic patients can be used to assess the activity of potential analgesic agents
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_1
Started May 2008
5 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 3, 2008
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 9, 2008
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2008
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2009
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2009
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
February 24, 2010
CompletedFebruary 9, 2021
February 1, 2010
9 months
April 3, 2008
January 5, 2010
January 21, 2021
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change From Baseline to Treatment Week 2 in Daily Pain Rating Scale
Daily Pain Rating Scale by treatment and sequence using an 11-point Likert scale: range 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain) over the past 24 hours. Self-assessment was performed daily on rising from bed (for the final time in the case of interrupted sleep). Average daily pain score: mean of the previous 7 days daily pain scores. Baseline was defined as the mean of the last 7 pre-treatment pain scores for each period. End of treatment was defined as the mean of the last 7 on treatment pain scores for each period.
Week 0 to Week 2, Week 4 to Week 6 (Baseline to Week 2 [End of Treatment] for each treatment period)
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI)
Week 0 to Week 2, Week 4 to Week 6 (Baseline to End of Treatment in Treatment Periods 1 and 2)
Subject Activity as Captured by the Actiwatch Score Device: Total Activity Score at End of Treatment
Week 0 to Week 2, Week 4 to Week 6 (Baseline to End of Treatment in Treatment Periods 1 and 2)
Study Arms (2)
A
ACTIVE COMPARATORB
PLACEBO COMPARATORInterventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients require a diagnosis of post-traumatic peripheral neuropathic pain (NeP), including post-surgical NeP and NeP due to peripheral nerve injury, which has lasted at least 3 months following the traumatic event.
- Patients during the screening week must have completed ≥ 4 daily pain scores and have an average daily pain score ≥ 4.
- Female patients of childbearing potential must have a negative urine pregnancy test at Screening and be practicing an acceptable form of contraception.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with neuropathic pain (NeP) that is not due to trauma; e.g. patients with trigeminal neuralgia, central pain, complex region pain syndrome type I, phantom limb pain, radiculopathy, painful diabetic neuropathy or post-herpetic neuralgia or patients with any other co-existing pain which cannot be differentiate from NeP of peripheral origin.
- Patients who have previously failed to respond to pregabalin at a total daily dose of equal to or greater than 300 mg or are intolerant to those doses.
- Patients who have previously failed to respond to gabapentin at a total daily dose of equal to or greater than 1800 mg.
- Patients with any type or history of malignancy, except either where there has been no ongoing treatment for at least 6 months or all basal cell carcinomas; all patients with a history of brain or spinal tumors will be excluded.
- Patients who currently have ongoing litigation related to any injury affecting their pain symptomatology.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (5)
Pfizer Investigational Site
Calgary, Alberta, T2N 4N1, Canada
Pfizer Investigational Site
Hamilton, Ontario, L8N 3Z5, Canada
Pfizer Investigational Site
Sarnia, Ontario, N7T 4X3, Canada
Pfizer Investigational Site
Jönköping, 551 85, Sweden
Pfizer Investigational Site
Linköping, 581 85, Sweden
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Pfizer ClinicalTrials.gov Call Center
- Organization
- Pfizer, Inc.
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Pfizer CT.gov Call Center
Pfizer
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 1
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 3, 2008
First Posted
April 9, 2008
Study Start
May 1, 2008
Primary Completion
February 1, 2009
Study Completion
February 1, 2009
Last Updated
February 9, 2021
Results First Posted
February 24, 2010
Record last verified: 2010-02