Improving Blood Glucose Control With a Computerized Decision Support Tool: Phase 2
Clinical Process Improvement With A Bedside Computerized Insulin Therapy Protocol For Blood Glucose Control (eProtocol-insulin) in Adult And Pediatric Intensive Care Unit Patients-Second Phase (Phase-2): Distribution and Implementation of Validated eProtocol-insulin in Naïve ICUs
2 other identifiers
interventional
200
1 country
10
Brief Summary
The Purpose of this study is to:
- 1.Introduce the refined, validated, and safe computerized bedside decision support tool for blood glucose management in critically ill adult and pediatric ICU patients that was studied in Phase 1 into a second group of naïve ICUs, none of which participated in eProtocol-insulin development, refinement or validation
- 2.Monitor how often low blood sugar levels occur during use of the bedside tool.
- 3.Determine how the computerized tool effects the workload of the ICU nurses.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_2
Started Sep 2007
Longer than P75 for phase_2
10 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2007
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 7, 2008
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 9, 2008
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2018
CompletedFebruary 26, 2015
February 1, 2015
10.3 years
April 7, 2008
February 24, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The primary outcome variable for feasibility during Phase-2 will be the acceptability of the eProtocol-insulin instructions (compliance of bedside clinicians with instructions). Proportion of glucose values < 40 mg/dl.
1 year
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Proportion of glucose determinations between 70 and 110 mg/dl (3.9-6.1 mMol/L) (efficacy)
1 year
Time to reach the 80-110 mg/dl target
1 year
Nursing perception of workload in comparison to ordinary care (efficacy and feasibility)
1 year
Proportion of glucose values 41-60 mg/dl
1 year
Study Arms (1)
eProtocol
EXPERIMENTALInterventions
Insulin dosing will be recommended by the computer tools based on subject glucose values. Bedside clinicians will have the ablity to accept or reject the suggested dose.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Pediatric ICU: Proposed indications by pediatric clinicians at participating ICUs for glucose control in their ICUs would include patients who require mechanical ventilation for greater than 24 hours and/or require a vasoactive infusion (e.g. dopamine \>3 mg/kg/min, dobutamine, epinephrine, or vasopressin).
- Adult ICUs: Proposed indications by clinicians in participating ICUs for glucose control in participating adult ICUs include critically ill patients with an anticipated ICU length of stay of 3 or more days.
You may not qualify if:
- Pregnancy (negative pregnancy test required for females of child-bearing age)
- Age less than one month
- Inborn errors of metabolism that the clinician suspects will affect glucose homeostasis
- Acute or chronic liver disease with any documented episode of blood or plasma glucose \<60 mg/dl within the 24 hours prior to study entry
- Diabetic Ketoacidosis (critically ill patients with insulin dependent diabetes not in ketoacidosis will be eligible if attending physicians intend to use intravenous insulin as part of ordinary care)
- Severe chronic liver disease (Child-Pugh score \>10)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (10)
Childrens Hospital Centeral California
Madera, California, United States
Childrens Hospital of Minnesota - St. Paul
Saint Paul, Minnesota, United States
Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center
Lebanon, New Hampshire, United States
Cornell University Medical College
New York, New York, United States
Mount Sinai Hospital
New York, New York, United States
Wake Forest University Baptist Medical Center
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States
Ohio State University
Columbus, Ohio, United States
University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston
Galveston, Texas, United States
Ben Taub General Hospital
Houston, Texas, United States
MD Anderson Cancer Center
Houston, Texas, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Alan H Morris, MD
Intermountain Medical Center, Murray, Utah
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 7, 2008
First Posted
April 9, 2008
Study Start
September 1, 2007
Primary Completion
December 1, 2017
Study Completion
December 1, 2018
Last Updated
February 26, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-02