NCT00654654

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety profile and the treatment effect of autologous human fibroblasts and placebo when administered to facial wrinkles and creases

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
50

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for phase_2

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2007

Shorter than P25 for phase_2

Geographic Reach
1 country

5 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 1, 2007

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 3, 2008

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 9, 2008

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 1, 2008

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 1, 2008

Completed
3.8 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

March 13, 2012

Completed
Last Updated

March 13, 2012

Status Verified

February 1, 2012

Enrollment Period

1.3 years

First QC Date

April 3, 2008

Results QC Date

February 9, 2012

Last Update Submit

February 9, 2012

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Change in Subject Assessment of Wrinkles Compared to Baseline on Subject Wrinkle Assessment

    Subject Wrinkle Assessment was a five point ordinal scale that assessed the subject's assessment of the appearance of their face. A score of -2 (very dissatisfied) was the worst and a score of +2 (very satisfied) was the best.

    Baseline (prior to first treatment) compared to 6 months post last treatment

  • Independent Panel Global Improvement Assessment Compared to Baseline

    An independent panel of physicians reviewed photographs of subjects at baseline and 6 months after final study treatment and provided a score for improvement in appearance on the Global Improvement Assessment. The Global Improvement Assessment was a four point ordinal scale with 0 (No improvement) as the worst score and 3 (Marked Improvement) the best.

    Baseline (prior to treatment) compared to 6 months post last treatment

Study Arms (1)

Active

EXPERIMENTAL
Biological: Autologous Human Fibroblasts (azficel-T)

Interventions

1. Collection of 3 mm biopsies 2. Two injection treatments of facial wrinkles and creases 3. Conduct of study assessments

Also known as: LAVIV
Active

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Male or female, at least 18 years of age
  • High Investigator wrinkle severity assessment score
  • Subject assessment of dissatisfaction of facial appearance
  • Provide written informed consent and comply with the study requirements
  • Negative pregnancy test at screening visit
  • Healthy, non-scarred skin for biopsy

You may not qualify if:

  • Low Investigator wrinkle severity assessment score
  • Subject assessment of satisfaction of facial appearance
  • Physical attributes which prevent the assessment or treatment of the facial wrinkles
  • Treatment with an investigational product or procedure within 30 days or plans to participate in another clinical trial
  • Previous treatment with Isolagen Therapy
  • History of active autoimmune disease or organ transplantation
  • Diagnosis of cancer, receiving active treatment
  • History of pigmentary disorders which can affect the face
  • Active or chronic skin disease
  • Known genetic disorders affecting fibroblasts or collagen
  • Active systemic infection
  • Requires chronic antibiotic or steroidal therapy
  • Use of certain cosmetic treatments \& procedures
  • Use of systemic agents that increase bleeding or clotting, or disorders equated with these effects
  • Pregnant or lactating women or women trying to become pregnant
  • +4 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (5)

Rhonda Rand, M.D., Inc.

Beverly Hills, California, 90210, United States

Location

The Laser Institute for Dermatology

Santa Monica, California, 90404, United States

Location

Winter Park and Orlando Plastic Surgery

Orlando, Florida, 32804, United States

Location

Dermatology Partners

Wellesley, Massachusetts, 02481, United States

Location

Dermatology, Laser and Vein Specialists of the Carolinas

Charlotte, North Carolina, 28207, United States

Location

Results Point of Contact

Title
Kevin Hennegan
Organization
CBR International Corp.

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
OTHER
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 2
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 3, 2008

First Posted

April 9, 2008

Study Start

March 1, 2007

Primary Completion

June 1, 2008

Study Completion

June 1, 2008

Last Updated

March 13, 2012

Results First Posted

March 13, 2012

Record last verified: 2012-02

Locations