Study Stopped
Poor accrual
CAELYX Versus Paclitaxel HCl in Patients With Epithelial Ovarian Carcinoma Following Failure of First-Line, Platinum-Based Chemotherapy
A Phase 3, Randomized, Open-Label, Comparative Study of CAELYX Versus Paclitaxel HCl in Patients With Epithelial Ovarian Carcinoma Following Failure of First-Line, Platinum-Based Chemotherapy
2 other identifiers
interventional
220
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The objective of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of CAELYX versus Paclitaxel HCl in patients with epithelial ovarian carcinoma following failure of first-line, platinum-based chemotherapy. The primary endpoint is time to progression (TTP) following treatment with either CAELYX or Paclitaxel HCl; the secondary endpoints are response rates, time to response, duration of response,quality of life assessment, and survival following treatment with either CAELYX or Paclitaxel HCl. Up to a total of 438 protocol-eligible patients with epithelial ovarian carcinoma following failure of first-line, platinum-based chemotherapy will be enrolled in order to obtain 350 evaluable patients.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_3
Started May 1997
Typical duration for phase_3
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 1997
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2000
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 1, 2008
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 7, 2008
CompletedApril 27, 2010
April 1, 2010
April 1, 2008
April 23, 2010
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
To demonstrate noninferiority with respect to time to progression (TTP) for CAELYX/DOXIL treatment when compared to paclitaxel treatment.
8 week intervals
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Response rates, time to response, duration of response,quality of life assessment, and survival following treatment with either CAELYX or Paclitaxel HCl.
one year
Study Arms (2)
001
EXPERIMENTAL002
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions
Dose of 175 mg/m2 by i.v. infusion over 3 hours starting on Day 1 of a 21-day cy
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Histologically proven (i.e., not borderline) epithelial ovarian carcinoma
- Measurable disease
- Recurrence of disease or disease progression indicative of failure of first-line platinum-based chemotherapy
- Disease-free from prior malignancies for \>5 years with the exception of curatively treated basal cell or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin or carcinoma in situ of the cervix
- Adequate renal creatinine (\<2.5 mg/dL (\<220 μmol/L)) \& liver function (aspartate amino transferase (AST) and alanine amino transferase (ALT) \<2 x upper limit of normal, alkaline phosphatase \<2.0 x upper limit of normal, except if attributed to tumor, and bilirubin \< upper limit of normal)
You may not qualify if:
- Pregnant or breast feeding
- Life expectancy of \<3 months
- Prior radiation therapy to more than one-third of hematopoietic sites within 30 days prior to first dose of study drug
- Prior therapy with DOXIL or paclitaxel
- Prior chemotherapy within 28 days of first dose of study drug (or 42 days if subject has received a nitrosourea or mitomycin)
- Treated with high dose therapy supported by bone marrow or peripheral stem cell transplantation at any time
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development, L.L.C.lead
- Sequus Pharmaceuticalscollaborator
- ALZAcollaborator
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research and Development, L.L.C. Clinical Trial
Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development, L.L.C.
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 1, 2008
First Posted
April 7, 2008
Study Start
May 1, 1997
Study Completion
April 1, 2000
Last Updated
April 27, 2010
Record last verified: 2010-04