NCT00651807

Brief Summary

This trial is conducted to evaluate the effect of etonogestrel in comparison to placebo on:

  • the prostate volume and the urinary complaints;
  • the urinary flow and the urinary volume in the bladder after voiding;
  • the progression of the disease;
  • the sexual function, well-being and urinary complaints-related Quality of Life. In addition the safety and the way the drug is absorbed and excreted by the body will be analyzed.

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
16

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for phase_2

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2008

Shorter than P25 for phase_2

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
terminated

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 1, 2008

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 31, 2008

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 3, 2008

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 1, 2008

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 1, 2008

Completed
Last Updated

April 8, 2026

Status Verified

February 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

5 months

First QC Date

March 31, 2008

Last Update Submit

April 2, 2026

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (7)

  • The effect of Org 3236 on prostate volume compared to placebo

    Screening (days -30 to -1), weeks 8, 12 and 24

  • The effect of Org 3236 on LUTS compared to placebo

    Screening up to and including week 24

  • The effect of Org 3236 on urinary flow and postvoid residual volume compared to placebo

    Screening and weeks 2 - 24

  • The effect on progression of LUTS

    Screening up to and including week 24

  • The effect of Org 3236 on sexual function; well-being and LUTS-related Quality of Life compared to placebo

    Screening and weeks 4 - 24; screening and weeks 2 - 24, respectively

  • The safety of Org 3236

    Screening up to and including week 24

  • The pharmacokinetic (Org 3236) and pharmacodynamic (T, DHT, LH, FSH, E2, SHBG) properties

    Randomization and weeks 2 - 8; randomization and weeks 2 - 12 and 24, respectively

Study Arms (2)

Arm 1

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

etonogestrel

Drug: etonogestrel

Arm 2

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

Placebo

Drug: Placebo

Interventions

Every day one tablet up to 8 weeks

Arm 2

Lowest dose of Org 3236 per two days, lowest dose of Org 3236 per day, highest dose of Org 3236 per day for 8 weeks

Also known as: Org 3236
Arm 1

Eligibility Criteria

Age50 Years - 80 Years
Sexmale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Signed written informed consent, obtained before screening evaluations;
  • Men diagnosed with LUTS suggestive of BPH: Baseline IPSS score of = 12 (moderate to severe); Prostate volume of = 40 mL and \< 100 mL (based on TRUS); Peak urinary flow rate = 15 mL/s with a voided volume of =125 mL
  • Age at least 50 but not older than 80 years at screening

You may not qualify if:

  • A post void residual volume \>250 mL
  • Use of drugs interfering with efficacy assessments within two weeks or six months prior to start treatment (depending on drug)
  • Acute urinary retention within the past 12 months
  • History of surgery for BPH, including other minimally invasive procedures
  • Presence of urinary tract infection
  • Presence or history of (subclinical) prostate cancer, bladder cancer, urethral stricture, or pelvic irradiation
  • Cardiac or cerebrovascular event within the past six months
  • Presence or history of any neurological disease associated with primary bladder dysfunction
  • Presence or history of liver/renal disease or disturbance of liver/renal function that failed to return to normal
  • Clinically relevant abnormal laboratory result as judged by the (sub)investigator

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Instituto Médico Especializado

Buenos Aires, Hidalgo, 1405, Argentina

Location

Related Publications (3)

  • Madersbacher S, Alivizatos G, Nordling J, Sanz CR, Emberton M, de la Rosette JJ. EAU 2004 guidelines on assessment, therapy and follow-up of men with lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic obstruction (BPH guidelines). Eur Urol. 2004 Nov;46(5):547-54. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2004.07.016.

    PMID: 15474261BACKGROUND
  • Gonzalez CM, McVary KT. The role of combination therapy for lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia. Curr Urol Rep. 2003 Aug;4(4):276-81. doi: 10.1007/s11934-003-0084-1. No abstract available.

    PMID: 12882718BACKGROUND
  • McConnell J, Abrams P, Denis L, Khoury S, Roehrborn C (eds). Male Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction - Evaluation and Management. Edition 2006 Paris, France: Editions 21, ISBN 0-9546956-6-6.

    BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Prostatic Hyperplasia

Interventions

etonogestrel

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Prostatic DiseasesGenital Diseases, MaleGenital DiseasesUrogenital DiseasesMale Urogenital Diseases

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 2
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 31, 2008

First Posted

April 3, 2008

Study Start

March 1, 2008

Primary Completion

August 1, 2008

Study Completion

August 1, 2008

Last Updated

April 8, 2026

Record last verified: 2022-02

Locations