ISIS 1 Therapeutic Effectiveness
Therapeutic Efficacy Evaluation of the CPAP/autoCPAP Sandman in the Treatment of New Patients With Obstructive Sleep Apnoea Syndrome
1 other identifier
interventional
24
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The study is a prospective field evaluation to assess the therapeutic value of the CPAP/autoCPAP Sandman in 24 new diagnosed Obstructive Sleep Apneic patients. Precisely, the study was designed to :
- evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of the CPAP/autoCPAP Sandman device in improving sleep quality and normalozing respiratory events
- determine the sensitivity and specificity of the device in adequately detecting respiratroy events
- compare effective pressure Peff determined by the device and during manual titration
- compare the impact of the two-speed descent pressure algorithm
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_3
Started Oct 2007
Shorter than P25 for phase_3
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2007
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 25, 2008
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 28, 2008
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2008
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2008
CompletedMarch 28, 2008
March 1, 2008
7 months
March 25, 2008
March 25, 2008
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
To determine the sensitivity and specificity of the CPAP/autoCPAP Sandman in adequately detecting respiratory events and to evaluate the therapeutic effectiveness of the device in improving sleep quality and normalizing respiratory events
May 2008
Secondary Outcomes (2)
To compare effective pressure Peff determined by the device and during manual titration
May 2008
To compare the impact of the two-speed descent pressure algorithm
May 2008
Study Arms (4)
A
EXPERIMENTALPhase 1 : manual Phase 2 : automatic Descent rate pressure : slow
B
EXPERIMENTALPhase 1 : manual Phase 2 : automatic Descent Rate Pressure : fast
C
EXPERIMENTALPhase 1 : automatic Phase 2 : manual Descent rate pressure : slow
D
EXPERIMENTALPhase 1 : automatic Phase 2 : manual Descent Rate Pressure : fast
Interventions
Each subject undergo 1 night of full polysomnography split into 2 consecutives and randomized sequences, using the Sandman device into two different modes: in APAP mode - Data analysis of this sequence will be used to evaluate the therapeutic effectiveness of the CPAP/autoCPAP Sandman in APAP mode compared both to the polysomnography registration and the diagnosis night for each enrolled patient. The type of respiratory events and their index/hour of sleep and the total arousal index will be appraised as markers of the efficacy of OSAS treatment, constituting the primary outcomes. in CPAP mode for manual titration sequence.During the manual titration, 5 constant pressure levels settings were studied for equal periods of 30 minutes gradually increasing the pressure. The aim of this sequence is to determine the sensitivity and the specificity of the CPAP/autoCPAP Sandman in detecting respiratory events.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- patient male or female, aged 18 to 75 years
- weight \> 30kg
- patient with a newly diagnosed OSAS, under treatment with CPAP
- patient in stable condition
- patient affiliated to a social security insurance
- having given its written informed consent to participate to the study
You may not qualify if:
- pneumothorax or pneumomediastin history
- massive epistaxis (current or previous)
- decompensated heart failure or hypotension
- pneumoencephal history, recent trauma or surgery sequel with cranio-nasopharyngeal fistula
- acute sinusitis history, middle ear infection or perforation of the tympanic membrane
- respiratory insufficiency or severe respiratory illness with the possibility of residual hypoxemia
- severe bullous emphysema or previously complicated pneumothorax
- severe claustrophobia
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Hospital Michalon, sleep disorders center
Grenoble, 38049, France
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Veronique Grillier-Lanoir
Tyco Healthcare Group
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 25, 2008
First Posted
March 28, 2008
Study Start
October 1, 2007
Primary Completion
May 1, 2008
Study Completion
May 1, 2008
Last Updated
March 28, 2008
Record last verified: 2008-03