Recollection Training in Healthy Older Adults and Older Adults With Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment
Memory Interventions for Older Adults
3 other identifiers
interventional
91
1 country
1
Brief Summary
We have developed a training intervention that successfully improves older adults' memory. We have also shown that older adults whose memory is as good as younger adults' memory (Hi-Old) use an altered pattern of memory-related brain activity compared to younger adults, whereas healthy older adults with poorer memory (Lo-Old) do not. We have also shown that individuals with amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment (aMCI) have impairments of conscious, effortful, Recollection-based memory processes, whereas their automatic, Familiarity-based memory processes are intact. Our primary current goal is to investigate whether our successful memory intervention will improve Recollection and produce induce altered patterns of brain activity in the Lo-Old and aMCI. Young, Lo-Old, Hi-Old, and aMCI will be scanned using functional magnetic resonance imaging while performing two memory tasks. Half of the Lo-Old and half of the aMCI will then receive the memory intervention, while the other half in each group will receive a control program consisting of information and games about aging. The Lo-Old and aMCI will then be rescanned while performing the two memory tasks. We predict that the memory intervention will improve performance on a number of memory tasks, and will induce altered patterns of brain activity. In the Lo-Old, their brain activity after the memory intervention will look more like the Hi-Old, while brain activity will become more focal in the aMCI.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2008
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2008
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 26, 2008
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 26, 2008
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2013
CompletedNovember 16, 2018
November 1, 2018
5.5 years
February 26, 2008
November 15, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Recollection estimates
Recollection, defined as Correct "yes" responses to "Same" repetitions minus Incorrect "yes" responses to "Different" repetitions, as a function of condition (trained versus control), lag (3, 16) and time (pre-, post-, and 3 month follow-up)
Immediately post-training and three months post-training
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Brain activation as assessed by functional magnetic resonance imaging
Immediately post-training
Transfer to other recollection-dependent task and to subjective memory measures
Immediately post-training and three months post-training
Study Arms (2)
1
EXPERIMENTALRecollection training via graduated increases in task difficulty, carried out over 36 sessions over 9 training days
2
ACTIVE COMPARATORComputer-delivered information sessions about memory and aging with Jeopardy-like games to engage participants
Interventions
Participants are exposed to long lists of words. Each word is presented either visually or auditorily, and each word is repeated after a variable number of intervening words (the lag), in each the same modality, or the other modality. Participants are instructed to respond "yes" only to words repeated in the same modality. If a performance criterion is met, the lag is increased for the next session; if the performance criterion is not met, the same lag is repeated in the next session.
Participants view PowerPoint presentations on various topics related to memory and aging (e.g., structural brain changes, diet, stress, depression) and how each of these topics affect memory, and after each presentation, play a Jeopardy-like game to test their knowledge gain
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- years old
- English as a first language or learned before kindergarten
- Right handed
You may not qualify if:
- Neurologic disorder
- Major medical disorder affecting cognition
- Psychiatric disorder
- Metal in the body that poses a hazard in the MRI scanner
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Baycrestlead
Study Sites (1)
Baycrest
Toronto, Ontario, M6A 2E1, Canada
Related Publications (5)
Anderson ND, Ebert PL, Jennings JM, Grady CL, Cabeza R, Graham SJ. Recollection- and familiarity-based memory in healthy aging and amnestic mild cognitive impairment. Neuropsychology. 2008 Mar;22(2):177-87. doi: 10.1037/0894-4105.22.2.177.
PMID: 18331160RESULTGuild EB, Vasquez BP, Maione AM, Mah L, Ween J, Anderson ND. Dynamic working memory performance in individuals with single-domain amnestic mild cognitive impairment. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2014;36(7):751-60. doi: 10.1080/13803395.2014.941790. Epub 2014 Aug 30.
PMID: 25175752RESULTEbert PL, Anderson ND. Proactive and retroactive interference in young adults, healthy older adults, and older adults with amnestic mild cognitive impairment. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2009 Jan;15(1):83-93. doi: 10.1017/S1355617708090115.
PMID: 19128531RESULTAnderson ND, Ebert PL, Grady CL, Jennings JM. Repetition lag training eliminates age-related recollection deficits (and gains are maintained after three months) but does not transfer: Implications for the fractionation of recollection. Psychol Aging. 2018 Feb;33(1):93-108. doi: 10.1037/pag0000214.
PMID: 29494181RESULTMeusel LA, Grady CL, Ebert PE, Anderson ND. Brain-behavior relationships in source memory: Effects of age and memory ability. Cortex. 2017 Jun;91:221-233. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2016.12.023. Epub 2017 Jan 12.
PMID: 28161030RESULT
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Nicole D Anderson, PhD, CPsych
Baycrest
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- BASIC SCIENCE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Senior Scientist
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 26, 2008
First Posted
March 26, 2008
Study Start
February 1, 2008
Primary Completion
August 1, 2013
Study Completion
August 1, 2013
Last Updated
November 16, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-11