A Multicenter, Randomized, Double Blind, Double Dummy, Parallel-Group Efficacy Study Comparing 8 Weeks of Treatment With Esomeprazole Magnesium (40mg qd) to Lansoprazole (30mg qd) for the Healing of Erosive Esophagitis in Patients With Moderate or Severe Erosive Esophagitis
2 other identifiers
interventional
1,000
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
This study looks at the healing rates in patients with Erosive Esophagitis (EE) when treated with either esomeprazole or lansoprazole
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_4
Started Dec 2002
Shorter than P25 for phase_4
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2002
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2003
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2003
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 18, 2008
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 24, 2008
CompletedMarch 26, 2009
March 1, 2009
8 months
March 18, 2008
March 25, 2009
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
To compare the difference in healing rates of erosive esophagitis (EE) between esomeprazole 40 mg qd (E40) and lansoprazole 30 mg qd (L30) in patients with moderate or severe EE, defined as Grade C or D in the Los Angeles (LA) Classification scale.
Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) at baseline and then week 4 and week 8 (if not healed at week 4)
Secondary Outcomes (3)
1. To compare the difference in the resolution of, and relief of, the investigator evaluated GERD symptoms of heartburn, acid regurgitation, dysphagia, and epigastric pain between E40 and L30 at week 4 of treatment in patients with moderate or severe EE.
Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) at baseline and then week 4 and week 8 (if not healed at week 4)
1. To compare the difference between E40 and L30 in the occurrence of heartburn symptoms as reported in the patient's daily diary.
Dairy card to be completed by patient daily
To evaluate safety and tolerability of E40 compared to that of L30 in patients with moderate or severe EE.
Adverse event collection on an ongoing basis
Study Arms (2)
1
EXPERIMENTALNexium
2
ACTIVE COMPARATORPrevacid
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Episodes of heartburn (described as a burning feeling, rising from the stomach or lower part of the chest up towards the neck) for 2 days or more during the last 7 days prior to baseline.
- Confirmed Erosive Esophagitis within 1 week prior to starting the study.
You may not qualify if:
- Any signs of gastrointestinal bleeding at the time of the starting the study.
- Any previous gastric or esophageal surgery.
- Various gastrointestinal diseases as listed in the protocol.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- AstraZenecalead
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Paula Fernstrom
Nexium Global Product Director, AstraZeneca
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 18, 2008
First Posted
March 24, 2008
Study Start
December 1, 2002
Primary Completion
August 1, 2003
Study Completion
August 1, 2003
Last Updated
March 26, 2009
Record last verified: 2009-03