NCT00641602

Brief Summary

This study looks at the healing rates in patients with Erosive Esophagitis (EE) when treated with either esomeprazole or lansoprazole

Trial Health

100
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
1,000

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for phase_4

Timeline
Completed

Started Dec 2002

Shorter than P25 for phase_4

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 1, 2002

Completed
8 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 1, 2003

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 1, 2003

Completed
4.6 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 18, 2008

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 24, 2008

Completed
Last Updated

March 26, 2009

Status Verified

March 1, 2009

Enrollment Period

8 months

First QC Date

March 18, 2008

Last Update Submit

March 25, 2009

Conditions

Keywords

Erosive EsophagitisNexiumHeartburn

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • To compare the difference in healing rates of erosive esophagitis (EE) between esomeprazole 40 mg qd (E40) and lansoprazole 30 mg qd (L30) in patients with moderate or severe EE, defined as Grade C or D in the Los Angeles (LA) Classification scale.

    Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) at baseline and then week 4 and week 8 (if not healed at week 4)

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • 1. To compare the difference in the resolution of, and relief of, the investigator evaluated GERD symptoms of heartburn, acid regurgitation, dysphagia, and epigastric pain between E40 and L30 at week 4 of treatment in patients with moderate or severe EE.

    Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) at baseline and then week 4 and week 8 (if not healed at week 4)

  • 1. To compare the difference between E40 and L30 in the occurrence of heartburn symptoms as reported in the patient's daily diary.

    Dairy card to be completed by patient daily

  • To evaluate safety and tolerability of E40 compared to that of L30 in patients with moderate or severe EE.

    Adverse event collection on an ongoing basis

Study Arms (2)

1

EXPERIMENTAL

Nexium

Drug: Esomeprazole

2

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Prevacid

Drug: Lansoprazole

Interventions

40mg once daily

Also known as: Nexium
1

30mg once daily

Also known as: Prevacid
2

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 75 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Episodes of heartburn (described as a burning feeling, rising from the stomach or lower part of the chest up towards the neck) for 2 days or more during the last 7 days prior to baseline.
  • Confirmed Erosive Esophagitis within 1 week prior to starting the study.

You may not qualify if:

  • Any signs of gastrointestinal bleeding at the time of the starting the study.
  • Any previous gastric or esophageal surgery.
  • Various gastrointestinal diseases as listed in the protocol.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Heartburn

Interventions

EsomeprazoleLansoprazole

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Signs and Symptoms, DigestiveSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Omeprazole2-PyridinylmethylsulfinylbenzimidazolesSulfoxidesSulfur CompoundsOrganic ChemicalsPyridinesHeterocyclic Compounds, 1-RingHeterocyclic CompoundsBenzimidazolesHeterocyclic Compounds, 2-RingHeterocyclic Compounds, Fused-Ring

Study Officials

  • Paula Fernstrom

    Nexium Global Product Director, AstraZeneca

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 18, 2008

First Posted

March 24, 2008

Study Start

December 1, 2002

Primary Completion

August 1, 2003

Study Completion

August 1, 2003

Last Updated

March 26, 2009

Record last verified: 2009-03