Performance of Two Silicone Hydrogel Toric Contact Lenses
Multi-Center Evaluation Of Two Silicone Hydrogel Toric Contact Lenses
2 other identifiers
interventional
276
1 country
19
Brief Summary
Evaluation of the clinical performance of two toric contact lenses in a 2-week, single masked (subject), daily wear, randomized, bilateral, parallel group study.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Feb 2008
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
19 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2008
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 10, 2008
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 19, 2008
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2008
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2008
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
July 19, 2010
CompletedMay 21, 2015
May 1, 2015
3 months
March 10, 2008
June 18, 2010
May 5, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Lens Orientation
Proportion of eyes with lens orientation within 5 degrees of optimal
1 minute after insertion
Lens Stability
Lens stability is measured as the amount of rotation induced from blink after the lens has settled.
10-15 minutes after insertion
Subjective Comfort
Subjective comfort was derived from a weighted combined score calculated from individual comfort-related questions asked on a 1-5 scale: 1 = most negative response to 5 = most positive response. \>0 = comfortable, \< 0 = uncomfortable. Combined measures from Week 1 and Week 5.
2 weeks of lens wear
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Time to Fit Lens
after lens insertion
Subjective Lens Vision
measured at 1 and 2 weeks
Overall Corneal Staining
After 2 weeks use
Study Arms (2)
senofilcon A toric
EXPERIMENTALsenofilcon A, daily wear, toric contact lens worn for two weeks
balafilcon A toric
ACTIVE COMPARATORbalafilcon A, daily wear, toric contact lens worn for two weeks
Interventions
silicone hydrogel toric lens, worn daily for 2 wks (2wks replacement)
silicone hydrogel toric lens, worn daily for 2 wks (2wks replacement)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Be between 18 and 45 years of age.
- Sign Written Informed Consent (See separate document).
- Be an existing successful daily wear toric soft contact lens.
- Require a visual correction in both eyes (monovision or uniocular fitting is NOT allowed).
- Does not require presbyopic correction (can read J1 @ normal reading distance).
- Have a sphere requirement in the range -1.00 and -5.00D (-5.25D refractive)
- Have refractive astigmatism between 0.75D and 2.50D in both eyes.
- Achieve visual acuity of 20/30 or better in each eye with spherical distance correction.
- Have normal eyes with no evidence of abnormality or disease. For the purposes of this study a normal eye is defined as one having:
- No amblyopia.
- No evidence of lid abnormality or infection.
- No conjunctival abnormality or infection.
- No clinically significant slit lamp findings (i.e. stromal edema, vascularisation, infiltrates or abnormal opacities).
- No other active ocular disease.
You may not qualify if:
- Requires concurrent ocular medication.
- Clinically significant (Grade 3 or 4) corneal stromal haze, corneal vascularisation, tarsal abnormalities, bulbar hyperemia, limbal hyperemia, or any other abnormality of the cornea that would contraindicate contact lens wear.
- Corneal staining Grade 3 in more than one region.
- Has had refractive surgery. Has had eye injury/surgery within 8 weeks immediately prior to enrolment for this study.
- Abnormal lacrimal secretions.
- Pre-existing ocular irritation that would preclude contact lens fitting.
- Keratoconus or other corneal irregularity.
- Polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) or Rigid Gas Permeable (RGP) lens wear in the previous 8 weeks
- Extended lens wear in last 3 months.
- Any systemic illness which would contraindicate lens wear or the medical treatment of which would affect vision or successful lens wear.
- Diabetic.
- Infectious disease (e.g., hepatitis, tuberculosis) or an immunosuppressive disease (e.g., HIV).
- Pregnancy, lactating or planning a pregnancy at the time of enrolment.
- Participation in any concurrent clinical trial or in last 60 days.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (19)
Camp Eye Care Clinic
North Little Rock, Arkansas, 72116, United States
James R. Dugue, O.D.
Mission Viejo, California, 92691, United States
Executive Park Eye Care
Colorado Springs, Colorado, 80909, United States
Dr. Ted Brink and Associates
Jacksonville, Florida, 32256, United States
Grene Vision Group
Neodesha, Kansas, 66757, United States
Advanced Eyecare, PC
Raytown, Missouri, 64133, United States
Dr. James Brobst
Florence, New Jersey, 08518, United States
Fine Eye Care Associates
Rochester, New York, 14623, United States
Warren Ophthalmology Associates
Warren, Ohio, 44484, United States
Selden Eyecare LLC
Kittanning, Pennsylvania, 16201, United States
Nittany Eye Associates
State College, Pennsylvania, 16801, United States
Dr. David W. Ferris and Associates
Warwick, Rhode Island, 02886, United States
Dr. Larry Menning
Chamberlain, South Dakota, 57325-0490, United States
Wishnow-Sugar Vision Group
Katy, Texas, 77450, United States
Dr. William Bogus
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84106, United States
Midlothian Optometric Center
Midlothian, Virginia, 23113, United States
The Eye Specialists, Ltd.
Virginia Beach, Virginia, 23455, United States
The Eye & Contact Lens Clinic
Bremerton, Washington, 98310, United States
Matus Eyecare
Franklin, Wisconsin, 53132, United States
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Kurt Moody OD
- Organization
- Vistakon
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Graeme YOung, MPhil PhD
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 10, 2008
First Posted
March 19, 2008
Study Start
February 1, 2008
Primary Completion
May 1, 2008
Study Completion
May 1, 2008
Last Updated
May 21, 2015
Results First Posted
July 19, 2010
Record last verified: 2015-05