Comparison of 2 Methods to Achieve Tight Glucose Control in Cardiovascular ICU Patients
Randomized Controlled Trial of Nurse-directed vs Nomogram-directed Intensive Glucose Control in the CVICU
1 other identifier
interventional
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
There is current evidence that maintaining ICU patient's blood sugar between 4.4-6.1 saves lives. However, this is difficult to do in the ICU and carries risks of lowering the blood sugar too much. In addition, the best way to achieve this control is not known. Many strict nomograms that provide a standardized approach for nurses have been developed and validated, including one here at SMH. However, these nomograms cannot apply to all patients at all times, especially ICU patients whose needs are rapidly changing. ICU nurses are at the bedside constantly, are very familiar with their patient's needs, and have decades of experience in titrating medication doses without a nomogram to achieve a pre-determined response (i.e. medications to achieve pre-selected blood pressure). Indeed, once the bedside nurse has bought into the importance of the concept of tight glucose control and have been introduced to the nomogram here at SMH, their experience and intuition may be more adaptable to the changing needs of the patient than an inflexible paper nomogram. This study will compare glucose control using our current standard nomogram versus no nomogram (i.e. nurse directed) in order to determine whether the nomogram should continue to be used.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_4
Started Jan 2008
Typical duration for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2008
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 7, 2008
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 14, 2008
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2010
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2010
CompletedJune 5, 2023
January 1, 2017
2.2 years
March 7, 2008
June 1, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Mean area-under-the curve for blood glucose within target per shift
over 12 hours
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Hypoglycemia frequency
per shift
Study Arms (2)
Nurse-directed
EXPERIMENTALUsing nursing judgement to control blood glucose
Nomogram-directed
ACTIVE COMPARATORBlood glucose control directed by pre-approved paper nomogram
Interventions
Based on the nursing judgement, titrate insulin infusion and determine glucose check frequency to achieve a target glucose of 5-8 mmol/L
A preprinted order outlining a nomogram with instructions for how insulin infusion should be changed based on measured glucose values and how frequent the glucose checks should be
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients:
- adult CVICU pts
- requires insulin therapy for glucose greater than 8 mmol/L
- anticipated ICU stay \> 24 hrs
- not in DKA/HHNK
- mechanically ventilated
You may not qualify if:
- MD refusal
- no IV access for insulin
- allergy to insulin
- DNR or moribund as determined by the clinical team
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
St. Michael's Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, M5B1W8, Canada
Related Publications (1)
Chant C, Mustard M, Thorpe KE, Friedrich JO. Nurse- vs nomogram-directed glucose control in a cardiovascular intensive care unit. Am J Crit Care. 2012 Jul;21(4):270-8. doi: 10.4037/ajcc2012713.
PMID: 22751370RESULT
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Clarence Chant, PharmD
Unity Health Toronto
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 7, 2008
First Posted
March 14, 2008
Study Start
January 1, 2008
Primary Completion
April 1, 2010
Study Completion
April 1, 2010
Last Updated
June 5, 2023
Record last verified: 2017-01