Molecule Removal and Ease of Use: A Comparison of Two Different Dialyzers
Urea, Phosphate and b2-Microglobulin Removal and Ease of Use: Comparing the Polyflux HD-C4 With the Polyflux 210H
1 other identifier
interventional
12
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The Polyflux HD-C4 (Gambro Renal Products) is a new dialyzer based on the existing Polyflux H membrane and dialyzer technology, but which achieves a performance comparable to Polyflux 210H in a significantly smaller device. The objectives of this study are:
- 1.To compare and contrast small and large molecule removal by the Polyflux HD-C4 and Polyflux 210H dialyzers under conditions of routine hemodialysis; and,
- 2.To compare and contrast the ease of use of the Polyflux HD-C4 dialyzer with that of the Polyflux 210H under conditions of routine clinical use for hemodialysis.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2008
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2008
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 13, 2008
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 14, 2008
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2008
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2009
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
August 11, 2011
CompletedJuly 14, 2025
July 1, 2025
10 months
February 13, 2008
March 7, 2011
July 3, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Comparison of Urea Removal Under Conditions of Routine Hemodialysis.
Urea removal is correlated with successful clinical outcomes. Kt/V is a way of measuring the delivered dose of dialysis where K=clearance of urea, t=treatment time and V=volume of body water. Single-pool (sp) Kt/V assumes that urea is removed from a single compartment in the human body during dialysis. However, because there are multiple compartments in the human body, rebound occurs following hemodialysis which lowers the Kt/V. Equilibrated (e) Kt/V is an equation that has been devised to predict the amount of rebound based on the ratio of K/V. Outcomes are posted for both spKt/V and eKt/V.
2 weeks = duration required for each subject to complete 6 consecutive dialysis treatments
A Comparison of Pre- to Post-dialysis Reduction of Small and Large Molecules Under Conditions of Routine Hemodialysis.
Overall removal of urea, phosphorus and β2-microglobulin was determined from the pre- to post-dialysis change in plasma concentration and from the amount of solute recovered in the dialysate. This outcome measure is reported as the percentage of pre- to post-dialysis reduction of urea, phosphorus and β2-microglobulin.
2 weeks = duration required for each subject to complete 6 consecutive dialysis treatments
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Comparison of Dialyzer Ease of Use Between the Polyflux HD-C4 Dialyzer and the Polyflux 210H
2 weeks = duration required for each subject to complete 6 consecutive dialysis treatments
Study Arms (2)
HD-C4 First, then 210H
OTHERSubjects will be randomly assigned to begin the first week of three consecutive treatments with the Polyflux HD-C4 dialyzer. Following the third treatment, the subjects will be switched to the Polyflux 210H dialyzer for a second week of three consecutive treatments. Therefore each subject will have a total of six consecutive dialysis treatments.
210H First, then HD-C4
OTHERSubjects will be randomly assigned to begin the first week of three consecutive treatments with the Polyflux 210H dialyzer. Following the third treatment, the subjects will be switched to the Polyflux HD-C4 dialyzer for a second week of three consecutive treatments. Therefore each subject will have a total of six consecutive dialysis treatments.
Interventions
Three consecutive treatments with the Polyflux 210H dialyzer. All study treatments will be performed in the standard hemodialysis mode.
Three consecutive treatments with the Polyflux HD-C4 dialyzer. All study treatments will be performed in the standard hemodialysis mode.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adults 18 years of age or older
- Stable hemodialysis prescription using Polyflux 210H or Polyflux 21R for at least 2 months prior to study enrollment
- Dialyzing through a native fistula or Gore-Tex graft.
- Blood access must be able to provide a blood flow rate of 400 ml/min.
You may not qualify if:
- Non-compliance with dialysis
- Hematocrit less than 28%
- Active Infection
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Vantive Health LLClead
- Gambro Renal Products, Inc.collaborator
- Baxter Healthcare Corporationcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
DaVita Clinical Research Facility
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55404, United States
Related Publications (2)
Daugirdas JT. Second generation logarithmic estimates of single-pool variable volume Kt/V: an analysis of error. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1993 Nov;4(5):1205-13. doi: 10.1681/ASN.V451205.
PMID: 8305648BACKGROUNDDaugirdas JT, Schneditz D. Overestimation of hemodialysis dose depends on dialysis efficiency by regional blood flow but not by conventional two pool urea kinetic analysis. ASAIO J. 1995 Jul-Sep;41(3):M719-24. doi: 10.1097/00002480-199507000-00107.
PMID: 8573901BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Global CORP Clinical Trials Disclosure
- Organization
- Vantive
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Harry Alcorn Jr., PharmD
Davita Clinical Research Facility
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- GT60
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 13, 2008
First Posted
March 14, 2008
Study Start
February 1, 2008
Primary Completion
December 1, 2008
Study Completion
March 1, 2009
Last Updated
July 14, 2025
Results First Posted
August 11, 2011
Record last verified: 2025-07