Efficacy and Safety of Ceftaroline Versus Linezolid in Subjects With Complicated Skin and Skin Structure Infections
A Phase 2, Multicenter, Randomized, Open-label, Comparative Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Intramuscular Ceftaroline Versus Intravenous Linezolid in Adult Subjects With Complicated Skin and Skin Structure Infections
1 other identifier
interventional
150
1 country
13
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine whether ceftaroline is effective and safe in the treatment of complicated skin and skin structure infections in adults.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_2
Started Feb 2008
Shorter than P25 for phase_2
13 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2008
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 3, 2008
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 11, 2008
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2008
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2008
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
August 31, 2012
CompletedMarch 14, 2017
February 1, 2017
5 months
March 3, 2008
July 25, 2012
February 2, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Clinical Response at the Test of Cure (TOC) Visit in the Modified Intent-to-treat (MITT) Population
The coprimary efficacy outcome measures were the per-subject clinical cure rate at the Test of Cure (TOC) Visit in the Clinically Evaluable (CE) and (Modified-Intent-to-Treat) MITT Populations. Subjects were considered clinically cured at the Test of Cure (TOC) Visit if they had total resolution of all signs and symptoms of the baseline infection, or improvement of the infection to such an extent that no further antimicrobial therapy was necessary.
Test of Cure Visit (8 to 15 days after end of therapy)
Clinical Response at the Test-of-Cure (TOC) Visit in the Clinically Evaluable (CE) Population
The coprimary efficacy outcome measures were the per-subject clinical cure rate at the TOC Visit in the CE and MITT Populations. Subjects were considered clinically cured at the TOC Visit if they had total resolution of all signs and symptoms of the baseline infection, or improvement of the infection to such an extent that no further antimicrobial therapy was necessary.
Test of Cure Visit (8 to 15 Days after end of therapy)
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Clinical Cure Rate at the TOC Visit in the cMITT Population
TOC Visit (8 to 15 days after end of therapy)
Clinical Response at the End-of-Therapy (EOT) Visit in the MITT, cMITT and CE Populations.
End-of-therapy (EOT) visit
The Microbiological Response at the TOC Visit in the mMITT and ME Populations.
TOC Visit (8 to 15 days after end of therapy)
Clinical and Microbiological Response by Pathogen at the TOC Visit in the mMITT and ME Populations
TOC Visit (8 to 15 days after end of therapy)
Clinical Relapse at the Late Follow-up Visit
Late Follow-up (LFU) Visit (21 to 35 days after end of therapy)
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Ceftaroline
EXPERIMENTALIntramuscular every 12 hours
linezolid plus optional aztreonam
ACTIVE COMPARATORIntravenous every 12 hours
Interventions
600 mg injected every 12 hours for at least 5 but not more than 14 days
600 mg parenteral infused over 60 minutes for a minimum of 5 days and a maximum of 14 days
1000 mg infused over 60 minutes every 24 hours may be started with linezolid or added later (up to 72 hours after the first dose of linezolid) for subjects with a gram-negative infection indicated.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Complicated skin and skin structure infection (cSSSI)
- Require initial hospitalization, or treatment in an emergency room or urgent care setting
You may not qualify if:
- Hypersensitivity or allergic reaction to any ß-lactam, ceftaroline, linezolid, aztreonam, or to their components
- Concomitant use of adrenergic or serotonergic agent
- Uncomplicated skin and skin structure infection
- Concomitant therapy with any drug known to exhibit a contraindicated drug-drug interaction
- More than 24 hours of treatment with an antimicrobial within 96 hours before randomization
- Known or suspected endocarditis, osteomyelitis, or septic arthritis
- Severely impaired renal function
- Evidence of significant hepatic, hematologic, or immunologic disease
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (13)
Investigational Site
Buena Park, California, 96020, United States
Investigational Site
Long Beach, California, 90813, United States
Investigational Site
Los Angeles, California, 90015, United States
Investigational Site
Rolling Hills Estate, California, 90274, United States
Investigational Site
San Diego, California, 92114, United States
Investigational Site
Atlantis, Florida, 33462, United States
Investigational Site
Columbus, Georgia, 31904, United States
Investigational Site
Savannah, Georgia, 31405, United States
Investigational Site
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55422, United States
Investigational Site
Butte, Montana, 59701, United States
Investigational Site
Somers Point, New Jersey, 08244, United States
Investigational Site
Columbus, Ohio, 43215, United States
Investigational Site
Toledo, Ohio, 43608, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Vice President, Clinical Sciences
- Organization
- Cerexa, Inc.
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Medical Monitor Cerexa
Forest Laboratories
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 3, 2008
First Posted
March 11, 2008
Study Start
February 1, 2008
Primary Completion
July 1, 2008
Study Completion
July 1, 2008
Last Updated
March 14, 2017
Results First Posted
August 31, 2012
Record last verified: 2017-02