Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of Rosuvastatin 5 mg Versus Pravastatin 40 mg and Atorvastatin 10 mg in Type IIa and IIb Hypercholesterolaemic Patients
CAP-Chol
2 other identifiers
interventional
668
1 country
170
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Rosuvastatin 5 mg as an hypercholesterolemia treatment comparatively at 2 other statins: Pravastatin 40 mg and Atorvastatin 10 mg. Treatment efficacy will be evaluated by the percentage of LDL-C variation after 8 weeks of treatment.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_4
Started Oct 2007
Shorter than P25 for phase_4
170 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2007
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 28, 2008
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 7, 2008
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2008
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2008
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
September 17, 2010
CompletedNovember 26, 2013
June 1, 2011
1 year
February 28, 2008
March 11, 2010
November 25, 2013
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) Level After 8 Weeks
To compare the percentages of LDL-C level variation. As the recruitment target was not reached at the date initially planned, and in view of the recruitment difficulties, AstraZeneca decided not to extend the patient recruitment period and to perform only a descriptive analysis of the data
Change from baseline and after 8 weeks of treatment
Secondary Outcomes (11)
To Compare the Percentage of Patients Reaching the Overall LDL-C Goal According to the French Agency for the Safety of Health Products (AFSSAPS) 2005 Guidelines for the Management of Dyslipidaemic Patients
Not done
To Compare the Percentage of Patients Reaching the LDL-C Goal, in Relation to the Number of Risk Factors, According to the French Agency for the Safety of Health Products (AFSSAPS) 2005 Guidelines for the Management of Dyslipidaemic Patients
Not done
Compare the Percentage of Total Cholesterol Variation From Baseline and After 8 Weeks of Treatment
from baseline and after 8 weeks of treatment
Compare the Percentage of HDL-C (High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol) Variation From Baseline and After 8 Weeks of Treatment
After 8 weeks of treatment
Compare the Percentage of Variation From Baseline Triglycerides Values and After 8 Weeks
Baseline and after 8 weeks of treatment
- +6 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
1
ACTIVE COMPARATORRosuvastatin and Pravastatin
2
ACTIVE COMPARATORRosuvastatin and Atorvastatin
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- subjects presenting type IIa or IIb primary hypercholesterolaemia diagnosed for at least 3 months, in a context of primary prevention with at least two associated cardiovascular risk factors and: (i)either "naive" to all lipid-lowering therapy, (ii)or treated with a statin (treatment ongoing or stopped during the previous 8 weeks)
You may not qualify if:
- homozygous or heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia
- hypertriglyceridaemia (TG ≥ 4 g/l)
- subjects at high cardiovascular risk according to the AFSSAPS 2005 definition (coronary artery disease or history of documented vascular disease, high cardiovascular risk type 2 diabetes, subject in primary prevention with a 10-year CHD risk \> 20%)
- history of adverse events or hypersensitivity to an HMG Co-A reductase inhibitor (particularly a history of myopathy)
- concomitant use of any drugs not authorized during the study
- active liver disease with elevation of serum transaminases (ASAT, ALAT) more than twice the upper limit of normal
- CPK more than 3 times the upper limit of normal
- moderate or severe renal failure (creatinine clearance \< 6 ml/min)
- poorly controlled hypothyroidism; poorly controlled hypertension (DBP \> 95 mm Hg and/or SBP \> 180 mm Hg)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- AstraZenecalead
Study Sites (170)
Research Site
Aix-en-Provence, France
Research Site
Allaire, France
Research Site
Amiens, France
Research Site
Ancerville, France
Research Site
Angers, France
Research Site
Annecy, France
Research Site
Anzin, France
Research Site
Arles, France
Research Site
Arthez-de-Béarn, France
Research Site
Aspach-le-Bas, France
Research Site
Aubagne, France
Research Site
Auchel, France
Research Site
Bailleul, France
Research Site
Balma, France
Research Site
Beaucaire, France
Research Site
Belfort, France
Research Site
Bersée, France
Research Site
Bézenet, France
Research Site
Béziers, France
Research Site
Biarritz, France
Research Site
Blois, France
Research Site
Bondues, France
Research Site
Bondy, France
Research Site
Bordeaux, France
Research Site
Brignoud, France
Research Site
Bruay-la-Buissière, France
Research Site
Bruges, France
Research Site
Bœrsch, France
Research Site
Cabanac-et-Villagrains, France
Research Site
Cadaujac, France
Research Site
Caen, France
Research Site
Cannes La Bocca, France
Research Site
Carnon-Plage, France
Research Site
Caylus, France
Research Site
Cernay, France
Research Site
Cestas, France
Research Site
Champcueil, France
Research Site
Chanceaux-sur-Choisille, France
Research Site
Chilly-Mazarin, France
Research Site
Clary, France
Research Site
Collioure, France
Research Site
Colombier-Fontaine, France
Research Site
Colomiers, France
Research Site
Coulonieix Chamiers, France
Research Site
Crécy-la-Chapelle, France
Research Site
Crotenay, France
Research Site
Cuise-la-Motte, France
Research Site
Derval, France
Research Site
Dijon, France
Research Site
Eckbolsheim, France
Research Site
Eckwersheim, France
Research Site
Épernay, France
Research Site
Épinal, France
Research Site
Étang-sur-Arroux, France
Research Site
Évreux, France
Research Site
Fargues-Saint-Hilaire, France
Research Site
Folembray, France
Research Site
Fos-sur-Mer, France
Research Site
Franconville, France
Research Site
Gamarde-les-Bains, France
Research Site
Gambsheim, France
Research Site
Gradignan, France
Research Site
Grand-Couronne, France
Research Site
Grendelbruch, France
Research Site
Guise, France
Research Site
Harnes, France
Research Site
Horbourg-Wihr, France
Research Site
Is-sur-Tille, France
Research Site
Ivry-sur-Seine, France
Research Site
Jarville-la-Malgrange, France
Research Site
Jeumont, France
Research Site
La Ciotat, France
Research Site
La Courneuve, France
Research Site
La Crèche, France
Research Site
La Francheville, France
Research Site
Lacrouzette, France
Research Site
Lamagistère, France
Research Site
Laval, France
Research Site
Le Bouscat, France
Research Site
Le Cannet, France
Research Site
Le Passage, France
Research Site
Les Issambres, France
Research Site
Léognan, France
Research Site
Lille, France
Research Site
Lucheux, France
Research Site
Marcq-en-Barœul, France
Research Site
Marseille, France
Research Site
Maslacq, France
Research Site
Mauguio, France
Research Site
Meaux-beauval, France
Research Site
Mennecy, France
Research Site
Mensignac, France
Research Site
Merlimont, France
Research Site
Metz, France
Research Site
Miramont-de-Guyenne, France
Research Site
Mittersheim, France
Research Site
Monfort En Chalosse, France
Research Site
Monguilhem, France
Research Site
Mont-de-Marsan, France
Research Site
Montauroux, France
Research Site
Montbéliard, France
Research Site
Monteux, France
Research Site
Montfrin, France
Research Site
Montigny-lès-Metz, France
Research Site
Montpellier, France
Research Site
Moreuil, France
Research Site
Muespach, France
Research Site
Nancy, France
Research Site
Nogent-sur-Marne, France
Research Site
Noyon, France
Research Site
Oberhausbergen, France
Research Site
Orchamps, France
Research Site
Palau-del-Vidre, France
Research Site
Paris, France
Research Site
Pau, France
Research Site
Pauillac, France
Research Site
Périgueux, France
Research Site
Pfulgriesheim, France
Research Site
Phalempin, France
Research Site
Pont-à-Mousson, France
Research Site
Pouilly-en-Auxois, France
Research Site
Poussan, France
Research Site
Pradines, France
Research Site
Puteaux, France
Research Site
Quimperlé, France
Research Site
Rognac, France
Research Site
Rohrwiller, France
Research Site
Roncq, France
Research Site
Roquevaire, France
Research Site
Roubaix, France
Research Site
Saint-Etienne, France
Research Site
Saint-Émilion, France
Research Site
Saint-Étienne-de-Montluc, France
Research Site
Saint-Girons, France
Research Site
Saint-Jean-de-Braye, France
Research Site
Saint-Leu-la-Forêt, France
Research Site
Saint-Martin-d'Oney, France
Research Site
Saint-Médard-en-Jalles, France
Research Site
Saint-Morillon, France
Research Site
Saint-Rémy, France
Research Site
Saint-Rémy-de-Provence, France
Research Site
Salles, France
Research Site
Sarlat-la-Canéda, France
Research Site
Semur-en-Auxois, France
Research Site
Serres-Castet, France
Research Site
Soissons, France
Research Site
Sorcy-Saint-Martin, France
Research Site
Strasbourg, France
Research Site
Tarare, France
Research Site
Targon, France
Research Site
Tartas, France
Research Site
Tassin-la-Demi-Lune, France
Research Site
Thônes, France
Research Site
Thun-Saint-Amand, France
Research Site
Toulon, France
Research Site
Toulouse, France
Research Site
Trie-sur-Baïse, France
Research Site
Varces-Allières-et-Risset, France
Research Site
Vatan, France
Research Site
Vence, France
Research Site
Vélizy-Villacoublay, France
Research Site
Vieux-Boucau-les-Bains, France
Research Site
Villard-Bonnot, France
Research Site
Villette-d'Anthon, France
Research Site
Viry-Châtillon, France
Research Site
Wasselonne, France
Research Site
Wattignies, France
Research Site
Wattrelos, France
Research Site
Yerres, France
Research Site
Yffiniac, France
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
As the recruitment target was not reached at the date initially planned, and in view of the recruitment difficulties, AstraZeneca decided not to extend the patient recruitment period and to perform only a descriptive analysis of the data.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Gerard Lynch
- Organization
- AstraZeneca
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Michel Farnier, MD
Le Point Medical - Rond Point du Jour
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 28, 2008
First Posted
March 7, 2008
Study Start
October 1, 2007
Primary Completion
October 1, 2008
Study Completion
October 1, 2008
Last Updated
November 26, 2013
Results First Posted
September 17, 2010
Record last verified: 2011-06