NCT00630877

Brief Summary

The primary purpose of this study was to evaluate the psychometric characteristics (reliability, validity, and responsiveness) of a Flushing ASsessment Tool (FAST) in subjects receiving niacin extended-release (NER) plus aspirin (ASA) daily for 6 weeks. The FAST is a questionnaire that was developed to provide a detailed assessment of flushing symptoms and their impact in patients receiving niacin therapy. The effect of aspirin on flushing symptoms, as measured by the FAST, was also evaluated.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
276

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for phase_3

Timeline
Completed

Started Feb 2008

Shorter than P25 for phase_3

Geographic Reach
1 country

40 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 1, 2008

Completed
28 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 29, 2008

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 7, 2008

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 1, 2008

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 1, 2008

Completed
1.4 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

October 9, 2009

Completed
Last Updated

October 9, 2009

Status Verified

September 1, 2009

Enrollment Period

4 months

First QC Date

February 29, 2008

Results QC Date

June 11, 2009

Last Update Submit

September 9, 2009

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (8)

  • Flushing ASsessment Tool (FAST) Test-retest Reliability--mean Flushing Severity Score

    Test-retest reliability of the mean flushing severity score was evaluated. The intraclass correlation coefficient comparing flushing severity scores for Week 1 and Week 2 was examined to determine test-retest reliability. Flushing severity was assessed using the FAST on a scale of 1 to 10, with 10 being the most severe.

    Week 1 to Week 2

  • FAST Test-retest Reliability--maximum Flushing Severity Score

    Test-retest reliability of the maximum flushing severity score was evaluated. The intraclass correlation coefficient comparing flushing severity scores for Week 1 and Week 2 was examined to determine test-retest reliability. Flushing severity was assessed using the FAST on a scale of 1 to 10, with 10 being the most severe.

    Week 1 to Week 2

  • FAST Cross-sectional Construct Validity--mean Flushing Severity Score

    The relationship between mean flushing severity and overall flushing troublesomeness was evaluated by examining the Spearman rank-order correlation. Flushing severity was assessed using the FAST on a scale of 1 to 10, with 10 being the most severe. Overall flushing troublesomeness was assessed using the FAST on a scale of 1 to 10, with 10 being the most troublesome.

    Week 1

  • FAST Cross-sectional Construct Validity--maximum Flushing Severity Score

    The relationship between maximum flushing severity and overall flushing troublesomeness was evaluated by examining the Spearman rank-order correlation. Flushing severity was assessed using the FAST on a scale of 1 to 10, with 10 being the most severe. Overall flushing troublesomeness was assessed using the FAST on a scale of 1 to 10, with 10 being the most troublesome.

    Week 1

  • FAST Longitudinal Construct Validity--mean Flushing Severity Score

    The relationship between the change in mean flushing severity scores from Week 1 to Week 2, and the subject-rated overall treatment effect scale administered at Week 2, was assessed by examining the Spearman rank-order correlation. Flushing severity was assessed using the FAST on a scale of 1 to 10, with 10 being the most severe. The overall treatment effect was assessed on a scale of 1 (symptoms are worse since study start), 2 (symptoms are about the same since study start), or 3 (symptoms are better since study start).

    Week 1 to Week 2

  • FAST Longitudinal Construct Validity--maximum Flushing Severity Score

    The relationship between the change in maximum flushing severity scores from Week 1 to Week 2, and the subject-rated overall treatment effect scale administered at Week 2, was assessed by examining the Spearman rank-order correlation. Flushing severity was assessed using the FAST on a scale of 1 to 10, with 10 being the most severe. The overall treatment effect was assessed on a scale of 1 (symptoms are worse since study start), 2 (symptoms are about the same since study start), or 3 (symptoms are better since study start).

    Week 1 to Week 2

  • FAST Responsiveness--mean Flushing Severity Score

    The change in mean flushing severity scores from study start to Day 43 was compared in subjects classified as responders vs. nonresponders. Flushing severity was assessed using the FAST on a scale of 1 to 10, with 10 being the most severe. Changes in mean flushing severity scores were negative if flushing symptoms improved and positive if flushing symptoms worsened.

    Study start to Day 43

  • FAST Responsiveness--maximum Flushing Severity Score

    The change in maximum flushing severity scores from study start to Day 43 was compared in subjects classified as responders vs. nonresponders. Flushing severity was assessed using the FAST on a scale of 1 to 10, with 10 being the most severe. Changes in maximum flushing severity scores were negative if flushing symptoms improved and positive if flushing symptoms worsened.

    Study start to Day 43

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Maximum Severity of Flushing Events Overall During the Study

    Week 1 to Week 6

Study Arms (3)

NER/ASA

EXPERIMENTAL
Drug: Niacin extended-release (NER)Drug: Aspirin (ASA)

NER/ASA Placebo

EXPERIMENTAL
Drug: Niacin extended-release (NER)Drug: Aspirin (ASA) placebo

NER Placebo/ASA Placebo

EXPERIMENTAL
Drug: Niacin extended-release (NER) placeboDrug: Aspirin (ASA) placebo

Interventions

Tablets administered once daily for 6 weeks; titrated to a maximum dose of 2000 mg

Also known as: ABT-919, Niaspan
NER/ASANER/ASA Placebo

Tablets administered once daily for 6 weeks

NER Placebo/ASA Placebo

Tablets (325 mg) administered once daily for 6 weeks

Also known as: acetylsalicylic acid
NER/ASA

Tablets administered once daily for 6 weeks

NER Placebo/ASA PlaceboNER/ASA Placebo

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Subject must be 18 years of age or older.
  • If female, subject is either not of childbearing potential, defined as postmenopausal for at least one year or surgically sterile, or is of childbearing potential and must agree to practice birth control for the duration of the study.
  • Have dyslipidemia as demonstrated by laboratory results.

You may not qualify if:

  • Have glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) \>= 9.0%.
  • Have nephrotic syndrome, dysproteinemias, or severe renal failure (glomerular filtration rate \[GFR\] \< 30 mL/minute, as calculated from creatinine clearance).
  • Have had unstable angina or an acute myocardial infarction (MI) within three months of the Screening Visit.
  • Have had severe peripheral artery disease as evidenced by intermittent claudication within three months of the Screening Visit.
  • Have had uncontrolled cardiac arrhythmias within three months of the Screening Visit.
  • Have a systolic blood pressure measurement of \> 180 mmHg or a diastolic blood pressure measurement of \> 110 mmHg at the Screening or Baseline Visit
  • Have active gout or uric acid \>= 11 mg/dL.
  • Have a history of hepatitis (acute or chronic), obstructive liver disease, or alanine aminotransferase (ALT; serum glutamic pyruvic transaminase \[SGPT\]) or aspartate aminotransferase (AST; serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase \[SGOT\]) values \>= 1.3 times the upper limit of normal (ULN) at the Screening Visit.
  • Have creatine phosphokinase (CPK) \>= 3 x ULN at the Screening Visit.
  • Have used an investigational study drug or participated in an investigational study within 30 days of the Screening Visit.
  • Have a health condition or laboratory abnormality (inclusive of clinically significant laboratory results at Screening Visit), which, in the opinion of the Investigator, may be adversely affected by the procedures or study medications in this study.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (40)

Unknown Facility

Birmingham, Alabama, 35209, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Anaheim, California, 92801, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Walnut Creek, California, 94598, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Denver, Colorado, 80212, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Brooksville, Florida, 34613, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Daytona Beach, Florida, 32127, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Hollywood, Florida, 33023, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Jacksonville, Florida, 32216, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Largo, Florida, 33770, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Miami, Florida, 33126, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Pembroke Pines, Florida, 33026, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Boise, Idaho, 83704, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Chicago, Illinois, 60610, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Arkansas City, Kansas, 67005, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Topeka, Kansas, 66608, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Wichita, Kansas, 67203, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Wichita, Kansas, 67207, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

St Louis, Missouri, 63141, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Las Vegas, Nevada, 89146, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Durham, North Carolina, 27704, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

High Point, North Carolina, 27262, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Salisbury, North Carolina, 28144, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Statesville, North Carolina, 28677, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Cincinnati, Ohio, 45242, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Portland, Oregon, 97239, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Duncansville, Pennsylvania, 16635, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Harleysville, Pennsylvania, 19438, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15206, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Greer, South Carolina, 29651, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Austin, Texas, 78752, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Carrollton, Texas, 75006, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Dallas, Texas, 75251, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

San Antonio, Texas, 78217, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

San Antonio, Texas, 78224, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Magna, Utah, 84044, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Murray, Utah, 84107, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Sandy City, Utah, 84094, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Gig Harbor, Washington, 98335, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Menomonee Falls, Wisconsin, 53051, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53209, United States

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Kawata AK, Revicki DA, Thakkar R, Jiang P, Krause S, Davidson MH, Punzi HA, Padley RJ. Flushing ASsessment Tool (FAST): psychometric properties of a new measure assessing flushing symptoms and clinical impact of niacin therapy. Clin Drug Investig. 2009;29(4):215-29. doi: 10.2165/00044011-200929040-00001.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Dyslipidemias

Interventions

NiacinAspirin

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Lipid Metabolism DisordersMetabolic DiseasesNutritional and Metabolic Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Nicotinic AcidsAcids, HeterocyclicHeterocyclic CompoundsPyridinesHeterocyclic Compounds, 1-RingSalicylatesHydroxybenzoatesPhenolsBenzene DerivativesHydrocarbons, AromaticHydrocarbons, CyclicHydrocarbonsOrganic Chemicals

Results Point of Contact

Title
Medical Information Specialist
Organization
Abbott

Study Officials

  • Roopal Thakkar, MD

    Abbott

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
OTHER
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 29, 2008

First Posted

March 7, 2008

Study Start

February 1, 2008

Primary Completion

June 1, 2008

Study Completion

June 1, 2008

Last Updated

October 9, 2009

Results First Posted

October 9, 2009

Record last verified: 2009-09

Locations