Comparison Between Two Endoscopic Treatments of Bleeding Internal Hemorrhoids:Band Ligation and Electrocoagulation Probe
Randomized Study Of Endoscopic Band Ligation Versus Bipolar Probe Electrocoagulation Of Bleeding Internal Hemorrhoids
1 other identifier
interventional
45
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine which treatment, band ligation (placing rubber bands around the hemorrhoids) or BICAP electrocoagulation (using electricity to cauterize) is safer and more effective endoscopic treatment for bleeding internal hemorrhoids.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Dec 1997
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 1997
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2000
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2001
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 27, 2008
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 7, 2008
CompletedMarch 7, 2008
May 1, 2001
2.4 years
February 27, 2008
March 6, 2008
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
treatment success rate
one year
Secondary Outcomes (1)
treatment complication rate
one year
Study Arms (2)
1
ACTIVE COMPARATORRubber band ligation
2
ACTIVE COMPARATORBipolar coagulation
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Grade II or III internal hemorrhoids with chronic rectal bleeding, which failed at least 8 weeks of intensive medical therapy.
- Age over 18 years
- A life expectancy of at least 24 months
- A signed written informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- The patient was uncooperative or could not return for routine outpatient follow-up
- Severe or end-stage co-morbid illness
- Prior endoscopic or surgical treatment of hemorrhoids within the past 6 months
- Ongoing need for anticoagulation therapy or high doses of aspirin or non-steroidal antiinflammatory agents
- Presence of severe rectal pain
- Recently thrombosed internal or external hemorrhoids
- Anal stricture,fissure, fistula,or abscess
- Rectal carcinoma or bleeding distal colonic polyp
- Rectal varices
- Acute or chronic colitis
- Rectal prolapse
- Radiation telangiectasia of the rectum
- Prothrombin time \>3 seconds over control
- Platelet count \<75,000
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Rome Jutabha,MD
Los Angeles, California, 90095, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 27, 2008
First Posted
March 7, 2008
Study Start
December 1, 1997
Primary Completion
May 1, 2000
Study Completion
May 1, 2001
Last Updated
March 7, 2008
Record last verified: 2001-05