Distribution of Topical Nasal Medication Within the Nasal Cavity and Sinuses by Radiographic Comparison
1 other identifier
interventional
18
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine the distribution of nasal sprays and nasal drops when used.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2008
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 20, 2008
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 29, 2008
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 12, 2008
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 9, 2009
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 9, 2009
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
August 15, 2019
CompletedSeptember 28, 2023
September 1, 2023
10 months
February 20, 2008
October 29, 2018
September 21, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
To Measure the Distribution of Nasal Sprays and Drops.
CT scan scored for distribution contrast delivered by nasal spray or drops within subsets in the nasal cavity. The sinonasal cavity was divided into twenty-one subsites on each side of the nasal cavity. The interpreters scored for the presence (1) or absence (0) of contrast from the nasal spray or nasal drops within each subsite. Left and right sides were interpreted separately for a possible total score of 0-42 for each CT scan.
2 months
Study Arms (2)
Nasal spray
EXPERIMENTALThis arm of the study will contain subjects who will spray 2-4 sprays of a nasal contrast solution in their nares. Following administration of the spray, the subjects will then have a Xoran mini-CAT scan of their sinuses.
Nasal drop
EXPERIMENTALThis arm will contain subjects who will place two drops of a nasal contrast solution in each nose. Following administration of the nasal contrast, the subjects will then have a Xoran miniCAT scan of their sinuses.
Interventions
Subjects will undergo a Xoran miniCAT scan of their sinuses
Subjects will spray 2-4 drops of half-strength Omnipaque 240 mgI/mL into each nare. Each spray is approximately 0.1 ml.
Subjects will place two drops of half-strength Omnipaque 240 mg I/mL intranasally to each nose. Each drop is approximately 1 ml.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- adult able to perform activities of daily living
You may not qualify if:
- signs or symptoms of acute or chronic paranasal sinus disease
- history of sinus surgery
- symptomatic deviated septum
- active seasonal allergies
- allergies to contrast
- history of nasal polyposis
- pregnant or breast feeding women
- neck or back problems that would prevent a subject from kneeling on the floor and crouching over
- currently taking metformin or amiodarone
- students or stff under the direct supervision of the investigators
- cognitive impairment
- terminal illness
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
ENT Specialist PC of Omaha
Omaha, Nebraska, 68114, United States
Related Publications (7)
Senocak D, Senocak M, Bozan S. Sinonasal distribution of topically applied particles: computerized tomographic detection and the effects of topical decongestion. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2005 Dec;133(6):944-8. doi: 10.1016/j.otohns.2005.08.024.
PMID: 16360518RESULTOlson DE, Rasgon BM, Hilsinger RL Jr. Radiographic comparison of three methods for nasal saline irrigation. Laryngoscope. 2002 Aug;112(8 Pt 1):1394-8. doi: 10.1097/00005537-200208000-00013.
PMID: 12172251RESULTWormald PJ, Cain T, Oates L, Hawke L, Wong I. A comparative study of three methods of nasal irrigation. Laryngoscope. 2004 Dec;114(12):2224-7. doi: 10.1097/01.mlg.0000149463.95950.c5.
PMID: 15564850RESULTBoatsman JE, Calhoun KH, Ryan MW. Relationship between rhinosinusitis symptoms and mucociliary clearance time. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2006 Mar;134(3):491-3. doi: 10.1016/j.otohns.2005.10.045.
PMID: 16500451RESULTLund VJ, Black JH, Szabo LZ, Schrewelius C, Akerlund A. Efficacy and tolerability of budesonide aqueous nasal spray in chronic rhinosinusitis patients. Rhinology. 2004 Jun;42(2):57-62.
PMID: 15224630RESULTAukema AA, Fokkens WJ. Chronic rhinosinusitis: management for optimal outcomes. Treat Respir Med. 2004;3(2):97-105. doi: 10.2165/00151829-200403020-00004.
PMID: 15182211RESULTCannady SB, Batra PS, Citardi MJ, Lanza DC. Comparison of delivery of topical medications to the paranasal sinuses via "vertex-to-floor" position and atomizer spray after FESS. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2005 Nov;133(5):735-40. doi: 10.1016/j.otohns.2005.07.039.
PMID: 16274802RESULT
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Erin K O'Brien
- Organization
- University of Nebraska Medical Center
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Erin K O'Brien, MD
University of Nebraska
- STUDY CHAIR
Donald Leopold, MD
University of Nebraska
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 20, 2008
First Posted
February 29, 2008
Study Start
March 12, 2008
Primary Completion
January 9, 2009
Study Completion
January 9, 2009
Last Updated
September 28, 2023
Results First Posted
August 15, 2019
Record last verified: 2023-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share