Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study of Larazotide Acetate in Subjects With Active Celiac Disease
A Phase IIb, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo Controlled Study for the Treatment of Active Celiac Disease With Larazotide Acetate (AT-1001)
1 other identifier
interventional
105
3 countries
33
Brief Summary
This study was conducted to assess the safety and efficacy of larazotide acetate versus placebo in inducing remission in subjects with active celiac disease.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_2
Started Feb 2008
33 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2008
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 7, 2008
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 21, 2008
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2009
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2009
CompletedSeptember 20, 2017
September 1, 2017
1.4 years
February 7, 2008
September 15, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Assess the efficacy of larazotide acetate in inducing remission in subjects with active celiac disease
Remission was defined as an improvement in the Villous Height to Crypt Depth (Vh:Cd) ratio obtained by duodeno-jejunal biopsy.
duodeno-jejunal biopsies were performed at Baseline and Day 56
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Assess the safety and tolerability of larazotide acetate
Up to 8 weeks
To prospectively validate the components of a composite weighted index of Celiac Disease activity (Celiac Disease Activity Rating Score, CeDARS), individually and as a whole.
Up to 8 weeks
To compare the CeDARS against the Clinician Global Assessment of disease (CGA), Psychological Well Being Index (PWBI) and the Short Form 12 version 2 (SF-12v2) health survey.
CGA, PWBI and SF-12v2 were collected at Visits 2, 3 and 4.
To assess the effects of larazotide acetate on inflammatory markers in subjects with active celiac disease subjects
Blood draws occurred at Visits 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5.
Study Arms (3)
Larazotide acetate 4 mg
EXPERIMENTALlarazotide acetate capsules 4 mg TID
Larazotide acetate 8 mg
EXPERIMENTALLarazotide acetate capsules 8 mg TID
Placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORPlacebo capsules
Interventions
gelatin capsule
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Male and female adults with celiac disease (as demonstrated by duodenal/jejunal biopsy or by capsule endoscopy plus positive anti-tTG)
- Marsh score ≥ II at screening
- Positive serum anti-tTG antibodies as determined by screening serology
- Willing to comply with a gluten-free diet for the duration of the study
You may not qualify if:
- Has refractory Celiac Disease or severe complications of celiac disease (eg, EATL-, ulcerative jejunitis, perforation, etc.)
- Has chronic active GI disease other than Celiac Disease
- Has diabetes (Type 1 or Type 2) or other autoimmune disease that might interfere with the conduct of the study
- Has hemoglobin value below 8.5 g/dL
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (33)
Study Site
Orange, California, 92868, United States
Study Site
San Francisco, California, 94115, United States
Study Site
Torrington, Connecticut, 06790, United States
Study Site
Jacksonville, Florida, 32207, United States
Study Site
Topeka, Kansas, 66606, United States
Study Site
Lexington, Kentucky, 40536, United States
Study Site
Hagerstown, Maryland, 21740, United States
Study Site
Silver Spring, Maryland, 20901, United States
Study Site
Chesterfield, Michigan, 48047, United States
Study Site
Troy, Michigan, 48084, United States
Study Site
Rochester, Minnesota, 55905, United States
Study Site
Asheville, North Carolina, 28801, United States
Study Site
Harrisburg, North Carolina, 28075, United States
Study Site
Gallipolis, Ohio, 45631, United States
Study Site
Paoli, Pennsylvania, 19301, United States
Study Site
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19014, United States
Study Site
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15243, United States
Study Site
Sioux Falls, South Dakota, 57105, United States
Study Site
Franklin, Tennessee, 37067, United States
Study Site
Houston, Texas, 77030, United States
Study Site
Edmonton, Alberta, T6G2X8, Canada
Study Site
Abbotsford, British Columbia, V5ZIH2, Canada
Study Site
Kelowna, British Columbia, V1Y2H4, Canada
Study Site
Richmond Hill, Ontario, L4B3PB, Canada
Study Site
Palma, Mallorca, 07014, Spain
Study Site
Barcelona, 08028, Spain
Study Site
Huesca, 22004, Spain
Study Site
León, 24005, Spain
Study Site
Madrid, 28007, Spain
Study Site
Madrid, 28034, Spain
Study site
Madrid, 28040, Spain
Study Site
Reus, 43201, Spain
Study Site
Valladolid, 47005, Spain
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Francisco Leon, MD, Ph.D
Alba Therapeutics
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Masking Details
- double-blind
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 7, 2008
First Posted
February 21, 2008
Study Start
February 1, 2008
Primary Completion
July 1, 2009
Study Completion
December 1, 2009
Last Updated
September 20, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-09