NCT00619762

Brief Summary

This prospective, multicenter, open-label study will assess the clinical outcomes of the LTM product in three planned analyses. The primary objective of this study is to prospectively assess the clinical outcomes associated with the use of LTM in two-stage (expander then permanent implant) immediate post-mastectomy breast reconstruction.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
17

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2007

Typical duration for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

5 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 1, 2007

Completed
3 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 11, 2008

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 21, 2008

Completed
1.6 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 1, 2009

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2009

Completed
3.5 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

May 15, 2013

Completed
Last Updated

November 8, 2016

Status Verified

October 1, 2016

Enrollment Period

2 years

First QC Date

January 11, 2008

Results QC Date

December 19, 2012

Last Update Submit

October 4, 2016

Conditions

Keywords

Breast reconstruction

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Histology Sample Evaluations Assessing Incorporation of StratticeTM Reconstructive Tissue Matrix

    Evaluation of 3 histology parameters, fibroblast infiltration, immune cell response \& revascularization, expressed as frequency distributions. Samples evaluated for presence of fibroblasts (cellularity), neovascularization \& immune cell response using 4 pt scale. Fibroblast Infiltration: 1=None,2=Few,sparse,3=Moderate,4=Dense. Revascularization:1=None,2=Few randomly dispersed capillaries,3=Moderate; mostly homogenous distribution of new vessels,4=Significant,uniformly distributed vessels; both capillaries and arterioles. Immune Cell response: 1= None,2=Few,normal healing response,3=Moderate,4=Significant;above expected presence for healing. 4 high power(HP)fields reviewed \& if uniform in appearance/cellular distribution, 4 considered representative of sample as a whole. If non-uniform distribution observed, 3 HP fields of "sparse or light" distribution \& 3 HP fields of dense distribution counted \& results averaged. Tissue sample then assessed for overall acellularity \& expressed as %.

    At the time of expander/implant exchange (Stage II),

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Severity of Local Inflammation at and Around the Surgical Site

    Postoperative Day 7, 14, 21, 30 days

Interventions

Use of LTM to support weak and/or absent soft tissue to facilitate immediate breast reconstruction postmastectomy

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

women undergoing two-stage immediate breast reconstruction following a skin sparing mastectomy will be recruited from up to ten (10) participating centers

You may qualify if:

  • A candidate for immediate, two-stage breast reconstruction using LTM following a skin sparing mastectomy
  • An ASA Physical Status Classification5 of 1 or 2 (see App I)
  • Estimated life expectancy \> 1 year

You may not qualify if:

  • Clinically significant systemic disease
  • Received inductive chemo-therapy within 2 months prior to mastectomy or radiation therapy to the region at any time
  • Predicted excised breast mass of \>750 gms
  • Co-morbid factors which predispose to postoperative infection, such as insulin dependent diabetes, smoking, chronic steroid use, malnourishment, or co-existent infection
  • Need for tissue flap in addition to expander
  • History of alcohol abuse, illicit drug use, significant mental illness, physical dependence to any opioid, or drug abuse or addiction
  • Enrollment or plans to enroll in another clinical trial during this study that would affect the patient's safety or results of this trial
  • Any of the conditions identified within the labeled contraindications, i.e. sensitivity to porcine derived products or polysorbate

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (5)

Unknown Facility

Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Great Neck, New York, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Willow Grove, Pennsylvania, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

McLean, Virginia, United States

Location

Biospecimen

Retention: SAMPLES WITHOUT DNA

Tissue sample

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Breast Neoplasms

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Neoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsBreast DiseasesSkin DiseasesSkin and Connective Tissue Diseases

Limitations and Caveats

Small number of subjects and breasts analyzed.

Results Point of Contact

Title
Director of Clinical Operations
Organization
LifeCell

Study Officials

  • Michael Franz, MD

    LifeCell

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 11, 2008

First Posted

February 21, 2008

Study Start

October 1, 2007

Primary Completion

October 1, 2009

Study Completion

December 1, 2009

Last Updated

November 8, 2016

Results First Posted

May 15, 2013

Record last verified: 2016-10

Locations