Motor Imagery Practice in Neurological Rehabilitation

NCT00618085 | Completed Phase 2

• 2 other identifiers: 07/H0605/84NOC07/H0605/84
• Study Type: interventional
• Target: 50
• Locations: 1 country
• Sites: 1

Brief Summary

Motor imagery is a technique widely used in learning skills. Its effectiveness has been proven in various sports and in musicians. A recent review (Braun et al. 2006) suggested that this technique may also be effective in rehabilitation of patients with neurological disease or damage, but that further research was needed. The main purpose of this research is to discover whether motor imagery practice is beneficial in the rehabilitation of skills in patients who have some disability due to neurological disease or damage. The principal research question is: are physiotherapy and occupational therapy given incorporating motor imagery more effective than standard care (i.e., the same therapies but without integrated motor imagery) in re-training task specific performance for patients with neurological disease or damage?

Conditions

Stroke; Brain Injury; Multiple Sclerosis

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

• Goal Attainment Scaling

  After 6 and 12 weeks

Secondary Outcomes (3)

• Motor imagery questionnaire

  Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks

• Timed up and go

  Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks

• Action research arm test

  Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks

Study Arms (2)

1

EXPERIMENTAL

All patients will receive the occupational therapy and physiotherapy normally given in their setting. In addition; the experimental group will receive 2 instruction DVD's introducing them to motor imagery practice, taking 35 minutes in total. The research therapist will also attend the first session with the physiotherapist and with the occupational therapist to help incorporate motor imagery within the therapy. Thereafter the therapist will help the patient use motor imagery as part of their normal treatment. The total amount spent on motor imagery during therapy sessions will be 6.5 hours in 6 weeks.

Behavioral: Motor imagery practice

2

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

All patients will receive the occupational therapy and physiotherapy normally given in their setting. In addition; the control group will receive 2 DVDs for 35 minutes in total. These will show background information on their condition, explaining the importance of practice of activities, and on the principles of motor learning and phased movement which underlie most therapy.The research therapist will also attend the first session with the physiotherapist and with the occupational therapist to control for attention. The total amount the physiotherapist and occupational therapist spend with the patients should be the same in both groups.

Other: Standard physiotherapy and occupational therapy

Interventions

Motor imagery practice BEHAVIORAL

During motor imagery practice a person imagines performing a skill or movement with all its sensory consequences without actually moving. In this study the therapists follow a motor imagery guideline designed for rehabilitation of skills and movement performance in subjects with neurological disease or damage. The guideline offers therapists structure and a strategy to deliver subject-specific imagery. The guideline is based on three major frameworks, namely; principles of motor learning, phased process of human movement and a training guide for sports coaches and performers from the National Coaching Foundation.

1

Standard physiotherapy and occupational therapy OTHER

Patients with neurological disease or damage will receive standard physiotherapy and occupational therapy.

2

Eligibility Criteria

• Age: 18 Years+
• Sex: all
• Healthy Volunteers: No
• Age Groups: Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

• Participating in a rehabilitation program for problems arising secondary to disease or damage affecting the central nervous system (usually stroke, brain injury, multiple sclerosis)
• Over 18 years of age
• Have sufficient language and memory skills to undertake the intervention (i.e. score positive on the first three items of the Sheffield screening test)

You may not qualify if:

• Any co-morbidity that would interfere with the ability to perform imagery as judged by the clinician or from the medical notes (e.g., schizophrenia)

Sponsors & Collaborators

• Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre NHS Trust: lead
• Oxford Brookes University: collaborator

Study Sites (1)

Oxford Centre for Enablement

Oxford, OX3 7LD, United Kingdom

Location

Related Publications (1)

• Braun SM, Beurskens AJ, Borm PJ, Schack T, Wade DT. The effects of mental practice in stroke rehabilitation: a systematic review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006 Jun;87(6):842-52. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2006.02.034.

  PMID: 16731221 BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Stroke; Brain Injuries; Multiple Sclerosis

Interventions

Occupational Therapy

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Cerebrovascular Disorders; Brain Diseases; Central Nervous System Diseases; Nervous System Diseases; Vascular Diseases; Cardiovascular Diseases; Craniocerebral Trauma; Trauma, Nervous System; Wounds and Injuries; Demyelinating Autoimmune Diseases, CNS; Autoimmune Diseases of the Nervous System; Demyelinating Diseases; Autoimmune Diseases; Immune System Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Rehabilitation; Aftercare; Continuity of Patient Care; Patient Care; Therapeutics

Study Officials

• Thamar J Bovend'Eerdt, MSc

  Oxford Centre for Enablement

  PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

• Derick T Wade, MD

  Oxford Centre for Enablement

  STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

• Study Type: interventional
• Phase: phase 2
• Allocation: RANDOMIZED
• Masking: SINGLE
• Who Masked: OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
• Purpose: TREATMENT
• Intervention Model: PARALLEL
• Sponsor Type: OTHER

Study Record Dates

• First Submitted: February 5, 2008
• First Posted: February 18, 2008
• Study Start: February 1, 2008
• Primary Completion: April 1, 2009
• Study Completion: April 1, 2009
• Last Updated: May 4, 2009

Record last verified: 2009-05

Locations

GB (1)