NCT00612261

Brief Summary

Branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) is a common retinal vascular disease occurring in a significant number of individuals older than 50 years.The most common cause of visual disturbance in BRVO patients is macular edema, which has been reported in 60% of patients. Macular grid laser photocoagulation has been shown to be effective in the treatment of macular edema arising from BRVO. Some eyes are resistant to conventional grid laser treatment, and the conventional treatment is not useful in patients with intraretinal hemorrhages that may interfere with laser photocoagulation. Moreover, several studies have shown that conventional grid laser treatment for macular edema may be associated with complications. Intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide (IVTA) injection has recently been reported to be effective in the treatment of macular edema of various etiologies.On the other hand, arteriovenous sheathotomy is a surgical method suggested for treatment of macular edema in BRVO patients, and has been reported to be efficacious in patients refractory to conventional focal or grid laser macular photocoagulation.Both treatment modalities have been reported to be associated with reductions in central macular thicknesses and improved visual acuities. The purpose of the study is to compare the efficacies of arteriovenous (AV) sheathotomy and intravitreal triamcinolone (IVTA) injection in the treatment of macular edema associated with branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO).

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
40

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2006

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 1, 2006

Completed
10 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 1, 2007

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 1, 2007

Completed
6 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 25, 2008

Completed
17 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 11, 2008

Completed
Last Updated

February 11, 2008

Status Verified

January 1, 2008

Enrollment Period

10 months

First QC Date

January 25, 2008

Last Update Submit

January 25, 2008

Conditions

Keywords

Branch retinal vein occlusion; treatment

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • best-corrected ETDRS visual acuity score

    baseline, at 1,3,6 months after either treatment

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • complication rate

    at 1,3,6 months after either treatment

Study Arms (2)

1

EXPERIMENTAL

The group 1 patients receive AV sheathotomy for macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion.

Procedure: Arteriovenous Crossing Sheathotomy

2

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The group 2 patients receive IVTA.

Procedure: Intravitreal Triamcinolone Acetonide Injection

Interventions

In each sheathotomy patient, a standard pars plana vitrectomy is performed, followed by surgical separation of the posterior cortical vitreous from the optic nerve and posterior retina. After the relevant arteriovenous crossing site is identified based on preoperative FA, a bent microvitreoretinal blade is used to open the internal limiting membrane and the nerve fiber layer over the artery, with the incision commencing 100-200 micrometer proximal to the AV crossing. The incision is continued parallel to and under the retinal arteriole, with a gentle lifting motion, until the common AV crossing sheath is encountered and incised in a side-to-side manner. The completion of AV dissection is confirmed by an elevation of the overlying artery.

1

The IVTA group receive intravitreal injection of 4 mg/0.1 mL triamcinolone acetonide (40 mg/mL; Tamceton®; Hanall Pharmaceutical, Seoul, Korea). The injections are performed using 0.5% proparacaine drops (Alcaine®; Alcon Laboratories, Fort Worth, TX) for topical anesthesia under sterile conditions. The drug is injected through the inferotemporal pars plana using a 30-gauge needle. The correct intravitreal localization of the suspension, and perfusion of the optic nerve head, are then confirmed by indirect ophthalmoscopy.

2

Eligibility Criteria

Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • recent onset (within the 6 months prior to enrollment) of macular edema resulting from BRVO
  • best corrected Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) scores ≤ 40 letters (Snellen equivalent ≤ 20/40
  • intraretinal hemorrhages involving the foveal centers
  • generalized breakdown of the inner blood-retina barrier, as documented by diffuse fluorescein leakage on angiography, or diffuse thickening of the retina on optical coherence tomography (OCT), with involvement of the foveal center and most of the macular area, and with foveal thicknesses ≥ 250 micrometer

You may not qualify if:

  • prior history of intraocular surgery including cataract extraction
  • prior history of laser treatments including panretinal photocoagulation and focal/grid macular photocoagulation
  • prior history of elevated intraocular pressure secondary to steroid treatment
  • prior history of glaucoma or ocular hypertension
  • presence of comorbid ocular conditions that might affect visual acuity (VA).

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Yonsei University Health System

Seoul, 120-752, South Korea

Location

Related Publications (11)

  • Parodi MB, Spasse S, Iacono P, Di Stefano G, Canziani T, Ravalico G. Subthreshold grid laser treatment of macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion with micropulse infrared (810 nanometer) diode laser. Ophthalmology. 2006 Dec;113(12):2237-42. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.05.056. Epub 2006 Sep 25.

    PMID: 16996596BACKGROUND
  • Chen SD, Sundaram V, Lochhead J, Patel CK. Intravitreal triamcinolone for the treatment of ischemic macular edema associated with branch retinal vein occlusion. Am J Ophthalmol. 2006 May;141(5):876-883. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2005.12.011. Epub 2006 Mar 9.

    PMID: 16527226BACKGROUND
  • Lee H, Shah GK. Intravitreal triamcinolone as primary treatment of cystoid macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion. Retina. 2005 Jul-Aug;25(5):551-5. doi: 10.1097/00006982-200507000-00001.

    PMID: 16077348BACKGROUND
  • Chalam KV, Shah GY, Shah VA. Vitrectomy with or without arteriovenous adventitial sheathotomy for macular edema associated with branch retinal vein occlusion. Am J Ophthalmol. 2005 Jun;139(6):1146; author reply 1146-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2005.02.024. No abstract available.

    PMID: 15953467BACKGROUND
  • Hayashi K, Hayashi H. Intravitreal versus retrobulbar injections of triamcinolone for macular edema associated with branch retinal vein occlusion. Am J Ophthalmol. 2005 Jun;139(6):972-82. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2004.12.087.

    PMID: 15953425BACKGROUND
  • Horio N, Horiguchi M. Effect of arteriovenous sheathotomy on retinal blood flow and macular edema in patients with branch retinal vein occlusion. Am J Ophthalmol. 2005 Apr;139(4):739-40. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2004.10.026.

    PMID: 15808186BACKGROUND
  • Lakhanpal RR, Javaheri M, Ruiz-Garcia H, De Juan E Jr, Humayun MS. Transvitreal limited arteriovenous-crossing manipulation without vitrectomy for complicated branch retinal vein occlusion using 25-gauge instrumentation. Retina. 2005 Apr-May;25(3):272-80. doi: 10.1097/00006982-200504000-00004.

    PMID: 15805902BACKGROUND
  • Ozkiris A, Evereklioglu C, Erkilic K, Ilhan O. The efficacy of intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide on macular edema in branch retinal vein occlusion. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2005 Jan-Feb;15(1):96-101. doi: 10.1177/112067210501500115.

    PMID: 15751246BACKGROUND
  • Ozkiris A, Evereklioglu C, Erkilic K, Dogan H. Intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide for treatment of persistent macular oedema in branch retinal vein occlusion. Eye (Lond). 2006 Jan;20(1):13-7. doi: 10.1038/sj.eye.6701803.

    PMID: 15723039BACKGROUND
  • Yamamoto S, Saito W, Yagi F, Takeuchi S, Sato E, Mizunoya S. Vitrectomy with or without arteriovenous adventitial sheathotomy for macular edema associated with branch retinal vein occlusion. Am J Ophthalmol. 2004 Dec;138(6):907-14. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2004.06.061.

    PMID: 15629280BACKGROUND
  • Garcia-Arumi J, Martinez-Castillo V, Boixadera A, Blasco H, Corcostegui B. Management of macular edema in branch retinal vein occlusion with sheathotomy and recombinant tissue plasminogen activator. Retina. 2004 Aug;24(4):530-40. doi: 10.1097/00006982-200408000-00005.

    PMID: 15300073BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Macular EdemaRetinal Vein Occlusion

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Macular DegenerationRetinal DegenerationRetinal DiseasesEye DiseasesVenous ThrombosisThrombosisEmbolism and ThrombosisVascular DiseasesCardiovascular Diseases

Study Officials

  • Hyoung Jun Koh, MD, PhD

    Yonsei University Heath System

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 25, 2008

First Posted

February 11, 2008

Study Start

October 1, 2006

Primary Completion

August 1, 2007

Study Completion

August 1, 2007

Last Updated

February 11, 2008

Record last verified: 2008-01

Locations