NCT00606944|CompletedResultsDMC
Fast-track Rehabilitation After Elective Colorectal and Small Bowel Resection
Randomized Controlled Trial of Fast-Track Rehabilitation After Elective Colorectal and Small Bowel Resection
Loading search results
Sponsor study identifier
Secondary identifiers
interventional
200
1 country
2
Study Start
June 2007
Date type not reportedThis date has not been verified as actual or estimated.
Primary Completion
October 2009
Actual (reported)Study Completion
September 2011
Actual (reported)The purpose of this study is to address the question of whether or not oral alimentation and ambulation exercise should be begun early in patients following laparoscopic colorectal surgery compared to the classical diet and ambulation which depends on reappearance of functional intestinal transit. Early oral alimentation following laparoscopic colorectal surgery may decrease hospital stay and facilitate earlier discharge with comparable postoperative morbidity.
Registry-reported information. Elapsed time and enrollment totals alone do not measure study progress or recruitment pace.
September 2011
Actual (reported)Click on a node to explore related trials.
Some registry-reported names shown below are not yet linked in this graph.
Dates and qualifiers reported by the registry. Estimated dates do not confirm that a milestone has occurred.
June 2007
Date type not reportedThis date has not been verified as actual or estimated.
January 22, 2008
Actual (reported)February 5, 2008
Actual (reported)October 2009
Actual (reported)September 2011
Actual (reported)August 21, 2012
Actual (reported)the Length of Hospital Stay
discharge criteria 1. Tolerance of consecutive 3 soft bland diet 2. Unassisted ambulation 3. No necessity of analgesics 4. Afebrile without major complication 5. Willing to discharge
at discharge
Pain
score measured by the Visual Analog Scale
at discharge
Quality of Life
measured by SF-36
at discharge
Postoperative Complication During the First Admission
at discharge
Recovery
recovery criteria must include all of the following 1. Tolerance of consecutive 3 soft bland diet 2. Unassisted ambulation 3. No necessity of analgesics 4. Afebrile without major complication
at discharge
Readmission Rate
at postoperative day 30
Pain
at postoperative day 30
Quality of Life
at postoperative day 30
Postoperative Complication
at postoperative day 30
fast-track rehabilitation with early ambulation and diet after elective colorectal resection
traditional, conventional care group
fast-track rehabilitation with early ambulation and diet after elective colorectal resection
Registry-reported names are shown in full. Names without a link have not yet been matched to a Syfrah profile.
Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital
Seongnam, 463-707, South Korea
Sung-Bum Kang
Seongnam, 463-707, South Korea
Lee SM, Kang SB, Jang JH, Park JS, Hong S, Lee TG, Ahn S. Early rehabilitation versus conventional care after laparoscopic rectal surgery: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Surg Endosc. 2013 Oct;27(10):3902-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3006-4. Epub 2013 May 25.
Lee TG, Kang SB, Kim DW, Hong S, Heo SC, Park KJ. Comparison of early mobilization and diet rehabilitation program with conventional care after laparoscopic colon surgery: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Dis Colon Rectum. 2011 Jan;54(1):21-8. doi: 10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181fcdb3e.
Sung-Bum Kang, M.D., Ph.D
Seoul National University Bundang Hospital
200 participants (actual enrollment reported by the registry).
First Submitted
January 22, 2008
First Posted
February 5, 2008
Study Start
June 2007
Date type not reportedThis date has not been verified as actual or estimated.
Targeted Forceps Biopsy for Colorectal Tumors
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Primary Completion
October 2009
Actual (reported)Study Completion
September 2011
Actual (reported)Last Updated
August 21, 2012
Results First Posted
August 21, 2012
Record last verified: 2012-07
Download the complete ClinicalTrials.gov record imported by Syfrah, including fields not shown in this page. The registry may contain a newer revision.
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov.
JSON downloads include source attribution and retrieval details alongside the unchanged original record or the separately normalized values.
Source retrieved: