NCT00603135

Brief Summary

Status epilepticus (SE) represents the most common life-threatening neurological emergency requiring treatment on an intensive care unit. The incidence in Western European countries is about 12-18/100'000. Immediate and effective treatment of SE is obviously essential because of the deleterious effects of continuous seizures on the brain and the whole organism. Guidelines emphasize the use of benzodiazepines (BZD) as first-line anticonvulsive drugs. Alternatively, i/v Phenytoin (PHE), fosphenytoin (FOS), and valproate (VPA) were also tested as first-line anticonvulsants in SE. Direct comparison of PHE with lorazepam (LZP) showed significant superiority of LZP (evidence class I). Other trials i/v PHE or -VPA are of evidence class III or IV. BZD, VPA, and PHE have clinical and pharmacological disadvantages. BZD may cause respiratory depression or sedation and may be not suitable for patients with COPD or ambiguous in patients with BZD addiction. Some compounds also may induce tachyphylaxis or accumulate under concomitant renal failure. PHE has saturable metabolism subject to Michaelis-Menten kinetics increasing the risk of overdosing in an acute setting causing liver damage, serious cardiac arrhythmias, hypotension, cerebellar degeneration, peripheral neuropathy and local/systemic skin reactions. Although of unequivocal efficacy, PHE should no longer be used for long-term because of its adverse effects after chronic administration (irreversible cerebellar degeneration causing debilitating ataxia, painful polyneuropathy, and osteopenia increasing the risk of fractures). Metabolism by and self-induction of the hepatic CYP450 system make PHE prone to interactions with several other drugs, notably other antiepileptics. VPA may cause liver failure, hemorrhagic complications, pancreatitis, and hyperammonemic encephalopathy. To summarize, these three first-line agents for the treatment of SE may cause serious side effects in several patients with SE. Levetiracetam (LEV) is broad-spectrum antiepileptic drug. It binds to the presynaptic vesicular protein 2A abundantly present in different regions of the brain; LEV presynaptically modulates transmitter release, but the exact mechanism(s) remain unclear. Data also revealed that LEV stabilizes GABAA receptors upon repetitive activation what is important in treatment of SE because GABAA receptors undergo significant changes of subunit conformation within minutes after sustained activation like during SE. These changes render GABAA receptors the less anticonvulsive, the longer SE lasts. Levetiracetam has a favorable pharmacological profile with large safety margins. Its partly extrahepatic hydrolyzation bypasses the CYP450 system; renal excretion is 60-70% unchanged, and 23-27% metabolized. Dosage needs adjustment when renal function is impaired. LEV lacks interactions with any drugs yet. Drowsiness is the most common side-effect while respiration, liver and kidney function, and the blood system are not affected. LEV shows an important clinical effect even after the first dose and maximal efficacy within the first week of drug-intake. The favorable clinico-pharmacological profile predilects LEV for the first-line treatment of SE, especially in patients with multi-organ failure, sepsis, coma etc.. About 10 % of comatous patients may be in non-convulsive SE (NCSE) on ICU's. These patients are under polymedication whereby interactions of the anticonvulsants approved yet for the treatment of NCSE with their other drugs may have fatal effects. Conversely, non-interacting anticonvulsants would represent an advantage for the treatment of NCSE for these patients. Recently, the i/v formulation of LEV was approved by the FDA for the use in patients, but not specifically for the treatment of SE. Data about the single-dose bioavailability of i/v-LEV in comparison to oral tablets as well as multiple-dose pharmacokinetics and tolerability in healthy subjects were recently published. In addition, the administration of i/v-LEV dosages ranging from 2000-4000 mg within 15 minutes and of dosages ranging from 1500-2500 mg within 5 minutes was safe and well tolerated, and led to efficacious drug levels in a randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled safety and pharmacokinetic study in healthy volunteers. Slight somnolence is expected to be the only adverse effect of i/v LEV, sharply contrasting with the sedation up to coma after i/v benzodiazepines. Thus, even severely ill patients will be accessible to neurological tests under LEV which is a big advantage in this clinical difficult setting of NCSE. I-v LEV is considered an ideal candidate for the first-line use (before benzodiazepines) in patients with NCSE, especially in those with important comorbidity and concomitant polymedication. Thus, we would like to test the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of i/v-LEV as first-line medication in a open-label, single-center, prospective pilot study as outlined below.

Trial Health

30
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2008

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
withdrawn

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 13, 2007

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2008

Completed
27 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 28, 2008

Completed
1.4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 1, 2009

Completed
8 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 1, 2010

Completed
Last Updated

March 10, 2015

Status Verified

March 1, 2015

Enrollment Period

1.5 years

First QC Date

November 13, 2007

Last Update Submit

March 9, 2015

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Efficacy/ Clinical and/or electroencephalographic cessation of SE

    30 min

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • safety

    48 hrs

Study Arms (1)

A

EXPERIMENTAL
Drug: first-line i/v-levetiracetam

Interventions

No effect after 30 min, standard therapy with f.e. lorazepam for NCSE

A

Eligibility Criteria

Age20 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients 18 years old or older with NCSE. NCSE includes the following subtypes:
  • simple partial NCSE
  • complex partial status epilpeticus
  • Absence status
  • NCSE in critical illness
  • Written informed consent should be signed.

You may not qualify if:

  • Age below 20
  • Known intolerance to the study drug levetiracetam
  • Known pregnancy
  • Postanoxic SE
  • Subtle SE

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University Hospital Basel

Basel, Basel, 4031, Switzerland

Location

Related Publications (4)

  • Rupprecht S, Franke K, Fitzek S, Witte OW, Hagemann G. Levetiracetam as a treatment option in non-convulsive status epilepticus. Epilepsy Res. 2007 Mar;73(3):238-44. doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2006.10.011. Epub 2006 Dec 8.

    PMID: 17161587BACKGROUND
  • Ruegg SJ, Dichter MA. Diagnosis and Treatment of Nonconvulsive Status Epilepticus in an Intensive Care Unit Setting. Curr Treat Options Neurol. 2003 Mar;5(2):93-110. doi: 10.1007/s11940-003-0001-4.

  • Ramael S, Daoust A, Otoul C, Toublanc N, Troenaru M, Lu ZS, Stockis A. Levetiracetam intravenous infusion: a randomized, placebo-controlled safety and pharmacokinetic study. Epilepsia. 2006 Jul;47(7):1128-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2006.00586.x.

  • Ramael S, De Smedt F, Toublanc N, Otoul C, Boulanger P, Riethuisen JM, Stockis A. Single-dose bioavailability of levetiracetam intravenous infusion relative to oral tablets and multiple-dose pharmacokinetics and tolerability of levetiracetam intravenous infusion compared with placebo in healthy subjects. Clin Ther. 2006 May;28(5):734-44. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2006.05.004.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Status Epilepticus

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

SeizuresNeurologic ManifestationsNervous System DiseasesSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Stephan Rüegg, MD

    Neurology

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Stephan Rüegg, MD

    Neurology

    STUDY CHAIR
0

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 2
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 13, 2007

First Posted

January 28, 2008

Study Start

January 1, 2008

Primary Completion

July 1, 2009

Study Completion

March 1, 2010

Last Updated

March 10, 2015

Record last verified: 2015-03

Locations