Oocyte Cryopreservation: Slow Cooling Versus Vitrification Techniques on Oocyte Survival
Oocyte Cryopreservation: Comparison of Slow Cooling Versus Vitrification Techniques on Oocyte Survival, Fertilization, and Embryo Development
2 other identifiers
observational
14
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Oocyte cryopreservation has been studied for many years without much success in refining a method that has consistent, reliable results in producing viable embryos and clinical pregnancies. In 1986 the first baby was born from an embryo created from a frozen oocyte; however, since then there have been less than 150 births from frozen eggs. To date, there are no reportable adverse outcomes in the children born from frozen oocytes. The research continues to look at different methods of oocyte cryopreservation. Many smaller studies have been conducted with some success but larger clinical trials are needed to replicate these findings. The conventional cryopreservation technique has been slow cooling with differing methods of freezing; however, vitrification is now being researched as the potential cryopreserving method that holds some promise for the future. Our hypothesis is the use of vitrification (quick freezing) to cryopreserve oocytes in patients undergoing in-vitro fertilization will be more successful than slow freezing in oocyte survival, fertilization rate with ICSI and subsequent embryo development, implantation rate and pregnancy rate.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for all trials
Started Jul 2006
Longer than P75 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2006
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 15, 2008
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 28, 2008
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2009
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2010
CompletedOctober 28, 2011
October 1, 2011
3.3 years
January 15, 2008
October 26, 2011
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Oocyte survival
When patient returns for thaw cycle
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Implantation rate
2 weeks after transfer of thawed oocyte
Study Arms (2)
Slow Freeze
Vitrification
Eligibility Criteria
The Center for Advanced Reproductive Services patient population
You may qualify if:
- Patients ≤ 36 years old
- Day #3 follicle stimulation hormone (FSH) \< 10mIU/ml, and Estradiol \< 70 pg/ml.
- The study will be limited to couples who do not wish to cryopreserve excess embryos, who would otherwise have their excess oocytes discarded.
- Body Mass Index (BMI) ≤ 35
- Patients currently being seen in our offices
You may not qualify if:
- Male partner requiring microsurgical epididymal sperm aspiration or testicular sperm extraction (MESA/TESE) for sperm retrieval
- Day #3 follicle stimulation hormone (FSH) \> 10mIU/ml, or estradiol \> 70 pg/ml
- Diagnosis of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS)
- Body Mass Index (BMI) \>35
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- UConn Healthlead
- EMD Seronocollaborator
Study Sites (1)
The Center for Advanced Reproductive Services
Farmington, Connecticut, 06030-6224, United States
Related Publications (11)
Boldt J, Cline D, McLaughlin D. Human oocyte cryopreservation as an adjunct to IVF-embryo transfer cycles. Hum Reprod. 2003 Jun;18(6):1250-5. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deg242.
PMID: 12773454BACKGROUNDCarroll J, Depypere H, Matthews CD. Freeze-thaw-induced changes of the zona pellucida explains decreased rates of fertilization in frozen-thawed mouse oocytes. J Reprod Fertil. 1990 Nov;90(2):547-53. doi: 10.1530/jrf.0.0900547.
PMID: 2250252BACKGROUNDFuku E, Xia L, Downey BR. Ultrastructural changes in bovine oocytes cryopreserved by vitrification. Cryobiology. 1995 Apr;32(2):139-56. doi: 10.1006/cryo.1995.1013.
PMID: 7743816BACKGROUNDHong SW, Chung HM, Lim JM, Ko JJ, Yoon TK, Yee B, Cha KY. Improved human oocyte development after vitrification: a comparison of thawing methods. Fertil Steril. 1999 Jul;72(1):142-6. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(99)00199-5.
PMID: 10428163BACKGROUNDKuleshova L, Gianaroli L, Magli C, Ferraretti A, Trounson A. Birth following vitrification of a small number of human oocytes: case report. Hum Reprod. 1999 Dec;14(12):3077-9. doi: 10.1093/humrep/14.12.3077.
PMID: 10601099BACKGROUNDPorcu E, Fabbri R, Seracchioli R, Ciotti PM, Magrini O, Flamigni C. Birth of a healthy female after intracytoplasmic sperm injection of cryopreserved human oocytes. Fertil Steril. 1997 Oct;68(4):724-6. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(97)00268-9.
PMID: 9341619BACKGROUNDPorcu E, Fabbri R, Damiano G, Giunchi S, Fratto R, Ciotti PM, Venturoli S, Flamigni C. Clinical experience and applications of oocyte cryopreservation. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2000 Nov 27;169(1-2):33-7. doi: 10.1016/s0303-7207(00)00348-8.
PMID: 11155951BACKGROUNDRall WF, Fahy GM. Ice-free cryopreservation of mouse embryos at -196 degrees C by vitrification. Nature. 1985 Feb 14-20;313(6003):573-5. doi: 10.1038/313573a0.
PMID: 3969158BACKGROUNDStachecki JJ, Cohen J, Willadsen S. Detrimental effects of sodium during mouse oocyte cryopreservation. Biol Reprod. 1998 Aug;59(2):395-400. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod59.2.395.
PMID: 9687313BACKGROUNDStachecki JJ, Cohen J, Willadsen SM. Cryopreservation of unfertilized mouse oocytes: the effect of replacing sodium with choline in the freezing medium. Cryobiology. 1998 Dec;37(4):346-54. doi: 10.1006/cryo.1998.2130.
PMID: 9917351BACKGROUNDStachecki JJ, Cohen J, Schimmel T, Willadsen SM. Fetal development of mouse oocytes and zygotes cryopreserved in a nonconventional freezing medium. Cryobiology. 2002 Feb;44(1):5-13. doi: 10.1016/S0011-2240(02)00007-X.
PMID: 12061843BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Claudio Benadiva, MD, HCLD
The Center for Advanced Reproductive Services, P.C.
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE CONTROL
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Laboratory Director and Director of the Preimplantation Genetics Diagnosis Program,
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 15, 2008
First Posted
January 28, 2008
Study Start
July 1, 2006
Primary Completion
October 1, 2009
Study Completion
May 1, 2010
Last Updated
October 28, 2011
Record last verified: 2011-10