Telesonography Adaptation and Use to Improve the Standard of Patient Care Within a Dominican Community
1 other identifier
interventional
106
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The role of teleradiology has far reaching implications for the health of remote and underserved populations. The ability to coordinate radiographic evaluation and diagnosis from a distance has the potential to raise the standard of patient care throughout the world. Perhaps the safest and most cost effective mode of teleradiology today is telesonography. The current project attempts to determine the extent that telesonography improves the standard of care within a rural government-run primary clinic within the Dominican Republic. The work reported herein is intended to compare the use of telesonography to the current standard of sonographic examination (referral to government hospital 60km from target clinic). The study was conducted by randomly assigning 100 patients with clinical indications for sonographic examination into experimental and control groups. Following a 60-day implementation period, the following research questions will be addressed: 1) To what extent does the use of asynchronous telesonography increase the percentage of definitive diagnoses based on the total number of scans (definitive diagnoses / total number of scans)? 2) To what extent does the use of asynchronous telesonography increase the continuity of care for patients? 3) To what extent does the elapsed time between scanning and final radiological interpretation decrease with the use of asynchronous telesonography? This study will also look at the history of telemedicine / telesonography and its dissemination into the mainstream practice of medicine, explore training protocols that may be used to assist others to establish new telesonography programs in a developing nations, and discuss both advances and persistent barriers to the implementation of telesonography programs. Hypothesis: The use of a store-and-forward telesonography system in this setting will increase the speed and number of final diagnoses per scan received by the target clinic and will increase the continuity of care by increasing the number and speed of follow-up appointments to the target clinic.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2008
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 31, 2007
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2008
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 11, 2008
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2008
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2008
CompletedJuly 22, 2019
July 1, 2019
2 months
December 31, 2007
July 18, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Using frequency distribution graphs, the time to final diagnosis, time to follow-up appointments, and number of successful follow-ups will be compared between the experimental and control groups.
60 days
Secondary Outcomes (6)
A test for significant differences for ordinal data (Likert-scale) will be obtained using the Mann-Whitney test (if data is skewed) or the sign test (if data is non-skewed).
60 days
Measures of variability for interval data (time) will be obtained using standard deviation.
60 days
Measures of variability for ordinal data (Likert-scale) will be obtained using a semi-interquartile range and standard deviation.
60 days
The measure of central tendency will be assessed using the mean.
60 days
A number of ratios can be extracted from the data including time, number of scans, type of scan, number of reports, number of follow-ups, correct preliminary diagnoses, etc
60 days
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
1
NO INTERVENTIONThe control group will receive traditional ultrasound consults (i.e. travel to nearest tertiary center for intraabdominal sonographic evaluation and return with radiologist's report).
2
EXPERIMENTALThe experimental group will receive the teleultrasound service. Participants are randomly assigned to this group. All patients will receive a traditional clinical work-up. An ultrasound examination will be offered if, based on initial clinical evaluation by an attending physician, the patient is found to have symptoms consistent with any the following abnormalities: ascites, blunt abdominal trauma, cholelithiasis, cholecystitis, cholangitis, pancreatitis, hydronephrosis, abdominal aortic aneurysm, hepatitis, portal hypertension, urolithiasis, abnormal uterine bleeding, ovarian mass or torsion.
Interventions
Sonographic exam will be performed by principal investigator. A "first-look" diagnosis, correlated with patient symptomology and laboratory analysis, will be made at the point of care. Using a store-and-forward framework, properly formatted non-compressed sonographic images and "Request for Interpretation" (RFI) forms will be transmitted to participating radiologists. RFI forms will be used to record diagnostic findings and rate the quality of the images and/or diagnostic value using a five-point Likert scale. RFI forms will also include a five-digit patient number, age, sex, and symptomology / reason for sonographic exam. Completed RFI forms will be transmitted back to the clinic at the radiologist's earliest convenience.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Clinical suspicion of one or more of the following: ascites, blunt abdominal trauma, cholelithiasis, cholecystitis, cholangitis, pancreatitis, hydronephrosis, abdominal aortic aneurysm, hepatitis, portal hypertension, urolithiasis, abnormal uterine bleeding, or ovarian mass or torsion
You may not qualify if:
- Urgent condition that requires immediate surgical intervention / transfer to tertiary medical center
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Primary Clinic of Veron
Punta Cana, La Altagracia Province, 23000, Dominican Republic
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
James E Sutherland, D.O.
Edward Via Virginia College of Osteopathic Medicine
- STUDY CHAIR
Dean Sutphin, Ph.D.
Edward Via Virginia College of Osteopathic Medicine
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 31, 2007
First Posted
January 11, 2008
Study Start
January 1, 2008
Primary Completion
March 1, 2008
Study Completion
March 1, 2008
Last Updated
July 22, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-07