NCT00589979

Brief Summary

Patients with knee pain due to Osteoarthritis (OA) experiencing sub-optimal pain relief from their current analgesic regimen will participate in a pilot clinical trial to evaluate the effectiveness and tolerability of the Lidoderm Patch compared with placebo in treating knee pain from OA.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
169

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for phase_2

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2007

Geographic Reach
1 country

20 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 1, 2007

Completed
10 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 26, 2007

Completed
15 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 10, 2008

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 1, 2008

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 1, 2008

Completed
2 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

September 22, 2010

Completed
Last Updated

October 5, 2017

Status Verified

September 1, 2017

Enrollment Period

1.3 years

First QC Date

December 26, 2007

Results QC Date

December 22, 2009

Last Update Submit

September 7, 2017

Conditions

Keywords

OsteoarthritisKneeLidodermLidocaineTopical patchAdjunct therapy

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Time-to-Exit From Current Study Treatment

    Time-to-exit was defined as the number of days at which a patient either met the switching criterion \[a 2-category change in the Pain Relief Scale (PRS) score in the worsening direction (increasing pain or decreasing pain relief) for 2 consecutive days\] or discontinued from the study. The PRS is a 9-point categorical rating scale to assess pain relief in the last 24 hours in which 0 = completely worse and 8 = complete pain relief. Traditional survival models that consider event times (e.g. median survival time) as independent and homogeneous across patients were not suitable for this study.

    Baseline, Period 1 (up to 4 weeks ±2 days), Period 2 (up to 4 weeks ±2 days), Period 3 (up to 4 weeks ±2 days), or Premature Discontinuation

Secondary Outcomes (9)

  • Time-to-Exit Due to Lack of Efficacy

    Period 1 (up to 4 weeks), Period 2 (up to 4 weeks), Period 3 (up to 4 weeks), or Premature Discontinuation

  • Exit Status From Current Study Treatment - Yes

    Baseline, Period 1 (up to 4 weeks), Period 2 (up to 4 weeks), Period 3 (up to 4 weeks), or Premature Discontinuation

  • Overall Treatment Difference in the LSMeans of the Average of the Last Two Daily Pain Intensity Numerical Rating Scale (PI-NRS)

    Baseline, End of Period 1 (up to 4 weeks), End of Period 2 (up to 4 weeks) and End of Period 3 (up to 4 weeks)

  • Overall Treatment Difference in the LSMeans of the Average of the Last Two Daily Pain Relief Scale (PRS) Scores

    Baseline, End of Period 1 (up to 4 weeks), End of Period 2 (up to 4 weeks) and End of Period 3 (up to 4 weeks)

  • Overall Treatment Difference of the LSMeans of the Pain Quality Assessment Scale (PQAS) Scores

    Baseline, Period 1 (up to 4 weeks), Period 2 (up to 4 weeks), Period 3 (up to 4 weeks)

  • +4 more secondary outcomes

Other Outcomes (6)

  • Overall Treatment Difference in LSMeans of Beck Depression Inventory Second Edition (BDI-II) Total Score

    Baseline and end of treatment period (up to 4 weeks)

  • Quality of Life: Four Category Beck Depression Inventory Second Edition (BDI-II) Composite Score

    Screening, Baseline, Period 1 (up to 4 weeks), Period 2 (up to 4 weeks), Period 3 (up to 4 weeks)

  • Overall Treatment Difference in LSMeans for Continuous EuroQol Quality of Life Instrument (EQ-5D) Index Scores

    Baseline, Period 1 (up to 4 weeks), Period 2 (up to 4 weeks), Period 3 (up to 4 weeks), or Premature Discontinuation

  • +3 more other outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Lidoderm (Lidocaine 5% Patch)

EXPERIMENTAL

Lidoderm (lidocaine 5% patch) 10cm X 14cm patches each on the front and back of the index knee every 24 hours (q24h)

Drug: Lidoderm (Lidocaine 5% Patch)

Placebo Patch

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

Placebo Patch 10cm X 14cm patches each on the front and back of the index knee every 24 hours (q24h)

Drug: Placebo Patch

Interventions

Topical Patch

Also known as: Lidoderm
Lidoderm (Lidocaine 5% Patch)

Topical Patch

Also known as: Placebo
Placebo Patch

Eligibility Criteria

Age37 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Male or female patients ≥37 years with moderate-to-severe OA related pain in one knee
  • Body mass index (BMI) ≤40 kg/m2
  • Symptomatic OA of the index knee diagnosed with a functional capacity of II or III according to ACR criteria classification Note: Patients with symptomatic contralateral knee OA with persistent pain ≤2 cm on a 0-10 cm PI-NRS for ≥2 months will be allowed to participate.
  • Unchanged dose of analgesic medication for OA for at least 4 weeks prior to screening and for the duration of the study
  • Able and willing to complete all paper and e-diary assessments required by protocol

You may not qualify if:

  • Pain in any joint other than the index joint that could interfere with the patient's assessment of pain in the index joint
  • Compromised integrity of the intact, superficial skin layer
  • A grade 1 or 4 Kellgren and Lawrence score on radiographic examination
  • Recent injury to either knee causing pain and interference with daily activities (eg. walking)
  • Recent surgery/procedure to either knee causing pain that could interfere with study assessments of pain, function, and QoL
  • Known hypersensitivity or allergy to lidocaine, local anesthetics of the amide type, or any component of the product

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (20)

Arizona Arthritis Research, PLC

Paradise Valley, Arizona, 85253, United States

Location

NextCare Institute for Clinical Research

Phoenix, Arizona, 85016, United States

Location

HOPE Research Institute, LLC

Phoenix, Arizona, 85050, United States

Location

Clinical Research Consulting

Milford, Connecticut, 06460, United States

Location

New England Research Associates, LLC

Trumbull, Connecticut, 06611, United States

Location

Tampa Bay Medical Research, Inc.

Clearwater, Florida, 33761, United States

Location

Delray Research Associates

Delray Beach, Florida, 33484, United States

Location

CNS Clinical Trials

St. Petersburg, Florida, 33702, United States

Location

Clinical Research of West Florida

Tampa, Florida, 33606, United States

Location

Arthritis & Osteoporosis Center of Maryland

Frederick, Maryland, 21702, United States

Location

Midwest Pharmaceutical Research

City of Saint Peters, Missouri, 63376, United States

Location

Arthritis Center of Nebraska

Lincoln, Nebraska, 68516, United States

Location

Comprehensive Clinical Research

Berlin, New Jersey, 08009, United States

Location

University Hospitals of Case Medical Center - Arthritis Translational Research Program

Beachwood, Ohio, 44122, United States

Location

Community Research

Cincinnati, Ohio, 45245, United States

Location

Health Research of Oklahoma

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73103, United States

Location

Altoona Center for Clinical Research

Duncansville, Pennsylvania, 16635, United States

Location

Health Concepts

Rapid City, South Dakota, 57702, United States

Location

Radiant Research

San Antonio, Texas, 78217, United States

Location

Advanced Pain Management & Rehabilitation, Hilltop Medical

Virginia Beach, Virginia, 23454, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Osteoarthritis, KneeOsteoarthritis

Interventions

LidodermLidocaineTransdermal Patch

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

ArthritisJoint DiseasesMusculoskeletal DiseasesRheumatic Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

AcetanilidesAnilidesAmidesOrganic ChemicalsAniline CompoundsAminesEquipment and Supplies

Limitations and Caveats

Due to operational issues, the modified intent-to-treat (MITT) population, consisting of all intent-to-treat (ITT) patients randomized on or after January 22, 2008, was added to the analysis plan; all efficacy data are presented for this population.

Results Point of Contact

Title
Clinical Trial Coordinator
Organization
Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Study Officials

  • Ernest A. Kopecky, PhD, MBA

    Endo Pharmaceuticals

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
OTHER
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 2
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 26, 2007

First Posted

January 10, 2008

Study Start

March 1, 2007

Primary Completion

June 1, 2008

Study Completion

October 1, 2008

Last Updated

October 5, 2017

Results First Posted

September 22, 2010

Record last verified: 2017-09

Locations