Inhalative Sedation in ICU With Sevoflurane Via Anaesthetic Conserving Device Compared to Propofol
1 other identifier
observational
120
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The evaluation of the presented study will work on the practicability of inhalative sedation on the ICU, potential benefits and limitations of the ACD system in a postoperative sedated patient population in comparison to a standard intravenous sedation regimen with propofol, and focus on renal and hepatic function, cardioprotection and pharmacoeconomics
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Dec 2006
Shorter than P25 for all trials
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2006
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2007
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2007
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 21, 2007
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 4, 2008
CompletedJanuary 4, 2008
December 1, 2007
1 year
December 21, 2007
January 3, 2008
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Extubation time
Termination of sedation to extubation
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Consumption of anaesthetics
until discharge from hospital
Renal function
until discharge from hospital
Hepatic function
until discharge from hospital
Cardioprotection
until discharge from hospital
Costs
until discharge from hospital
Study Arms (2)
1-Sevo
Sevoflurane/ACD group (n=60)
2-Propofol
Propofol group (n=60)
Interventions
Sevoflurane sedation, 0.5-1 Vol%, continuously via syringe pump, up to 72 hours in ICU
Propofol, 1.5-3 mg/kgBW/h, continuously via syringe pump, up to 72 hours
Eligibility Criteria
120 patients, scheduled for elective major surgery and postoperative admission to the ICU, are screened the day before surgery for potential in- and exclusion criteria.
You may qualify if:
- years
- elective operative procedure, and indication for admission to the ICU for postoperative sedation
- ASA I-III
- weight 50-120 kg
- Haemoglobin \> 10 g/dl
- ability and acceptance to agree to the study participation
You may not qualify if:
- malignant hyperthermia
- muscle diseases or weakness
- liver insufficiency (ASAT, ALAT \> 40 U/min)
- pancreas insufficiency
- emergencies
- women in child bearing age and missing negative pregnancy test, pregnancy or lactation
- diseases from the central nervous system (such as M. Parkinson and multiple sclerosis)
- increased intracranial pressure, head trauma
- pre-existing delirium, agitation and psychiatric derangements
- alcohol and drug abuse (including opioid abuse)
- allergy to any of the study agents
- refusal from the patient to participate in the study
- participation in another study project.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Klinikum Ludwigshafenlead
- Universitätsmedizin Mannheimcollaborator
Related Publications (3)
Sackey PV, Martling CR, Nise G, Radell PJ. Ambient isoflurane pollution and isoflurane consumption during intensive care unit sedation with the Anesthetic Conserving Device. Crit Care Med. 2005 Mar;33(3):585-90. doi: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000156294.92415.e2.
PMID: 15753751BACKGROUNDSackey PV, Martling CR, Granath F, Radell PJ. Prolonged isoflurane sedation of intensive care unit patients with the Anesthetic Conserving Device. Crit Care Med. 2004 Nov;32(11):2241-6. doi: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000145951.76082.77.
PMID: 15640636BACKGROUNDBerton J, Sargentini C, Nguyen JL, Belii A, Beydon L. AnaConDa reflection filter: bench and patient evaluation of safety and volatile anesthetic conservation. Anesth Analg. 2007 Jan;104(1):130-4. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000248221.44383.43.
PMID: 17179257BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Kerstin D. Röhm, Dr. med.
Klinikum Ludwigshafen, Department of Anaesthesiology, Ludwigshafen, Germany
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE CONTROL
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 21, 2007
First Posted
January 4, 2008
Study Start
December 1, 2006
Primary Completion
December 1, 2007
Study Completion
December 1, 2007
Last Updated
January 4, 2008
Record last verified: 2007-12