NCT00579215

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate a new program to help the patient and the caregiver make decisions about treatment for lung cancer. We need to know if a new information program is helpful to patients. The way that we will do this is by comparing it with the usual information program that we now provide. Patient are asked to make difficult decisions about their treatments. These decisions may include when to change treatments or when to stop treatment altogether. Most patients ask a family member or close friend to help them with these difficult decisions. A "caregiver" is someone they can count on to give support (either emotional or physical) over a period of time. The doctors and nurses will also help patients and their caregiver to make these decisions. They will tell them the risks with each treatment, the success with each treatment, and how much time there is for making each decision.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
8

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable cancer

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2006

Typical duration for not_applicable cancer

Geographic Reach
1 country

2 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 1, 2006

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 20, 2007

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 24, 2007

Completed
1.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 1, 2009

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 1, 2009

Completed
Last Updated

March 18, 2009

Status Verified

March 1, 2009

Enrollment Period

2.3 years

First QC Date

December 20, 2007

Last Update Submit

March 17, 2009

Conditions

Keywords

CancerEnhanced CareDecision-MakingAdvance Lung CancerQuestionairesStage III Lung CancerStage IV Lung Cancer

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • To determine the feasibility of implementing a short, clinic-based, decision-making aid (cognitive-behavioral skills intervention) for patients with advanced lung cancer (and their caregivers) facing cancer-directed treatment.

    2 years

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • To gather data for testing the hypothesis that patients with advanced lung cancer who receive a decision aid will report increased quality decision making, and decreased decisional conflict at the end of Decision 3 compared to the usual care group.

    2 years

Study Arms (2)

1

EXPERIMENTAL

Enhance Care (EC) will receive a decision aid with seven components: social support, anticipatory guidance, adhering to the patient's preference for participation in treatment decision making, a quality decision-making process tutorial, normalization (using a CD program), structured time with oncology professionals to discuss difficult decisions, and values clarification of 3 decisions throughout treatment. Self-report measures will be used for all participants in addition to probes for the taped interviews with EC. The outcome measures are quality decision making and decisional conflict. Two panels (decision making and lung cancer) will review the protocol twice. The plan will include serially screening the appointment roster. The decision aid will be administered during three clinic visits.

Behavioral: Enhance Care

2

OTHER

As an intentional control, the usual care group will receive standard care related to lung cancer and treatment; they will not receive any oral, written, or recorded information related to decision making. Usual care includes anticipatory guidance related to the disease and treatment (e.g., what to do about treatment side effects, signs of an infection, why a treatment would be changed or stopped) using patient education materials normally used in the MSKCC, TOS, Outpatient Clinic.

Behavioral: Usual Care

Interventions

Enhance CareBEHAVIORAL

EC will receive a decision aid with seven components: social support, anticipatory guidance, adhering to the patient's preference for participation in treatment decision making, a quality decision-making process tutorial, normalization (using a CD program), structured time with oncology professionals to discuss difficult decisions, and values clarification of 3 decisions throughout treatment. Self-report measures will be used for all participants in addition to probes for the taped interviews with EC. The outcome measures are quality decision making and decisional conflict. Two panels (decision making and lung cancer) will review the protocol twice. The plan will include serially screening the appointment roster. The decision aid will be administered during three clinic visits

Also known as: EC
1
Usual CareBEHAVIORAL

As an intentional control, the usual care group will receive standard care related to lung cancer and treatment; they will not receive any oral, written, or recorded information related to decision making. Usual care includes anticipatory guidance related to the disease and treatment (e.g., what to do about treatment side effects, signs of an infection, why a treatment would be changed or stopped) using patient education materials normally used in the MSKCC, TOS, Outpatient Clinic.

2

Eligibility Criteria

Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Pathologically or cytologically determined non-small cell lung cancer
  • Stage IIIA, IIIB or IV extent
  • No prior chemotherapy unless used in adjuvant therapy, completed more than two years ago, and no sign of any other malignancy active at this time
  • Lung cancer-directed treatment with a standard or investigative chemotherapy regimen at entry
  • Patients with brain metastasis are acceptable provided they are at least 3 weeks from completion of radiation therapy for brain metastasis, have stable and acceptable neurological status, and meet all other eligibility criteria. For patients undergoing gamma knife procedure, cognitive ability is the judgment call of the oncologist and study nurse as to whether comprehension is not a problem.

You may not qualify if:

  • Performance status of KPS 60-100% or ECOG 0-2;
  • No age limit
  • Life expectancy greater than three months
  • A caregiver (any family member or concerned other who consistently provides emotional and/or physical support) available to also participate
  • Patient and caregiver are able to understand English (ability to repeat back in their own words)

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

New York, New York, 10065, United States

Location

University of Virginia- School of Nursing

Charlottesville, Virginia, 22908, United States

Location

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

NeoplasmsLung Neoplasms

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Respiratory Tract NeoplasmsThoracic NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteLung DiseasesRespiratory Tract Diseases

Study Officials

  • Leslie B Tyson, NO

    Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 20, 2007

First Posted

December 24, 2007

Study Start

November 1, 2006

Primary Completion

March 1, 2009

Study Completion

March 1, 2009

Last Updated

March 18, 2009

Record last verified: 2009-03

Locations