Ruptured Aorta-iliac Aneurysms: Endo vs. Surgery
ECAR
Randomized Study Comparing Endovascular Repair Versus Conventional Repair for Ruptured Aorta-iliac Aneurysms
2 other identifiers
interventional
107
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of this multicenter randomized trial is to compare the endovascular repair versus conventional repair for ruptured aorta-iliac aneurysms observed on CT scan in stable patients with suitable anatomy. The main awaited result is the significant reduction of the mortality of the conventional repair.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Dec 2007
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2007
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 19, 2007
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 20, 2007
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2014
CompletedOctober 23, 2014
July 1, 2013
5.2 years
December 19, 2007
October 22, 2014
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Mortality at 30 days after the treatment(endovascular repair versus conventional repair)
30 days after the treatment
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Compare at 30 days after the treatment the:- Cardiac , pulmonary, digestive , renal neurological morbidity, other…- Duration of stay in intensive care unit- Quantity of blood transfusions
30 days after the treatment
Compare at 6 month after the treatment the:- Cardiac , pulmonary, digestive , renal neurological morbidity (amendment 6)
6 month after treatment
Compare at one year after the treatment the:- Cardiac , pulmonary, digestive , renal neurological morbidity (amendment 6)
one year after the treatment
Study Arms (2)
1
OTHEREndovascular repair
2
OTHERconventional surgery repair
Interventions
Endovascular repair of the asymptomatic aneurysms of the abdominal aorta
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age \>= 18 years
- Ruptured aorta-iliac aneurysms diagnosed by CT
- scan with injection.
- Aneurysm developed on native infra-renal aorta or iliac.
- Non infectious false aneurysms developed on prosthesis (Deleted by amendment n°1 at the request of AFSSAPS)
- Ruptured aneurysm after endoprosthesis (Deleted by amendment n°1 at the request of AFSSAPS)
- Stable hemodynamic condition: systolic blood pressure on arrival higher than 80 mmHg in the absence of continuous vasopressive drugs administration.
- Anatomic criteria :length of aortic proximal neck \>10 mm, diameter of aortic proximal neck \< 32 mm, Absence of aortic neck angulation \> 90° and patent iliac without important stenosis or tortuosity.
- Technical constraints (validation of experience form) : Trained operator (at least 15 endoprosthesis in asymptomatic patients), Endovascular materials at disposal
You may not qualify if:
- Unstable hemodynamic condition
- Asymptomatic aneurysm
- Non-ruptured symptomatic aneurysm or aneurysm complicated with emboli.
- Mycotic aneurysm, infectious false aneurysms
- Post-traumatic aneurysm
- Supra-renal thoracic-abdominal aneurysm
- Impossibility to obtain a CT-scan with injection
- Patient non-affiliated to the social security and the protected people
- Pregnancy or breast-feeding
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
CHU Henri Mondor
Créteil, 94000, France
Related Publications (3)
Alsac JM, Desgranges P, Kobeiter H, Becquemin JP. Emergency endovascular repair for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms: feasibility and comparison of early results with conventional open repair. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2005 Dec;30(6):632-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2005.06.010. Epub 2005 Aug 1.
PMID: 16061405BACKGROUNDDesgranges P, Kobeiter H, Katsahian S, Bouffi M, Gouny P, Favre JP, Alsac JM, Sobocinski J, Julia P, Alimi Y, Steinmetz E, Haulon S, Alric P, Canaud L, Castier Y, Jean-Baptiste E, Hassen-Khodja R, Lermusiaux P, Feugier P, Destrieux-Garnier L, Charles-Nelson A, Marzelle J, Majewski M, Bourmaud A, Becquemin JP; ECAR Investigators. Editor's Choice - ECAR (Endovasculaire ou Chirurgie dans les Anevrysmes aorto-iliaques Rompus): A French Randomized Controlled Trial of Endovascular Versus Open Surgical Repair of Ruptured Aorto-iliac Aneurysms. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2015 Sep;50(3):303-10. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2015.03.028. Epub 2015 May 20.
PMID: 26001320DERIVEDDesgranges P, Kobeiter H, Castier Y, Senechal M, Majewski M, Krimi A. The Endovasculaire vs Chirurgie dans les Anevrysmes Rompus PROTOCOL trial update. J Vasc Surg. 2010 Jan;51(1):267-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2009.10.128.
PMID: 20117503DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Pascal Desgranges, PUPH
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 19, 2007
First Posted
December 20, 2007
Study Start
December 1, 2007
Primary Completion
February 1, 2013
Study Completion
February 1, 2014
Last Updated
October 23, 2014
Record last verified: 2013-07