Improving Sleep in Nursing Homes
2 other identifiers
interventional
79
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Older people living in nursing homes do not sleep very well for many reasons. Sleep disorders such as sleep apnea (when someone briefly stops breathing during sleep), and night time urination, along with the problems caused by the nighttime environment of the nursing home, such as noise and disruptive care routines can all contribute. Poor sleep can lead to other health problems or make existing health problems worse. This study will evaluate how well a sleep hygiene intervention and a medication for sleep (ramelteon (Rozerem)) work to improve sleep in nursing home residents with poor sleep. Ramelteon is FDA approved and has been tested in older adults living in the community, but not in older adults living in nursing homes. We expect sleep to improve on the study drug along with the sleep hygiene intervention, in comparison to placebo along with the sleep hygiene intervention. Based on adverse events reported in previous samples of older subjects, we expect the study drug to cause few side effects.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_4
Started Oct 2007
Typical duration for phase_4
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2007
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 17, 2007
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 19, 2007
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2010
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2010
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
August 13, 2014
CompletedAugust 13, 2014
August 1, 2014
2.3 years
December 17, 2007
September 17, 2013
August 12, 2014
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Number of Participants Meeting Good Sleep Latency Criteria
Sleep Latency Criteria for "Good Latency" measured by behavioral observations conducted every 10-15 minutes after 4pm until 11pm. Good latency is described as subject asleep in under 20 minutes on 51% of the nights observed in a week.
All assessment periods, up to one week
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Sleep Efficiency
All Assessment Phases, up to one week
Daytime Engagement Status
All Assessment Phases, up to one week
Other Outcomes (1)
Daytime Sleep
All Assessment Phases, up to one week
Study Arms (2)
Group1
EXPERIMENTALSHI followed by Active Drug Ramelteon
Group 2
PLACEBO COMPARATORSHI Followed by Placebo
Interventions
Subjects demonstrating low sleep efficiencies and prolonged sleep latencies, will be randomly assigned to continue to receive SHI accompanied by either placebo or Ramelteon (8 mg). Matching placebo will be obtained and the medication pre-packaged and ordered based on the randomization results.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- After initial screening and consenting, subjects with a 5-night average baseline sleep efficiency of less than or equal to 75% will be included
You may not qualify if:
- Less than 65 yrs old
- Bedbound
- Resided in NH for less than two months
- Patients on Medicare Part A skilled Benefit(anticipated short length stay) - Terminal Illness
- Unstable psychotropic drug regimen (addition, discontinuation, or change of dosage of any psychotropic drug in the prior two weeks) - Use of hypnotic, antihistamine, or benzodiazepine more than once per week during the two weeks before screening
- Use of drugs that could potentially inhibit the metabolism of Ramelteon (ie: fluvoxamine, ketoconazole, fluconazole)
- Use of Drugs that induce the metabolism of Ramelteon (ie: rifampin)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Emory Universitylead
- National Institutes of Health (NIH)collaborator
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Low power to detect statistically significant effects of the interventions on outcomes; Inability to examine predictors of responsiveness because of the small sample size and the large number of predictors of response.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Patricia Griffiths
- Organization
- Emory University Division of General Medicine and Geriatrics
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Patricia C Griffiths, PhD
Emory University, School of Medicine, Division of General Medicine and Geriatrics
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 17, 2007
First Posted
December 19, 2007
Study Start
October 1, 2007
Primary Completion
February 1, 2010
Study Completion
May 1, 2010
Last Updated
August 13, 2014
Results First Posted
August 13, 2014
Record last verified: 2014-08