A Study to Investigate an Immunomodulatory Therapy in Adult Patients With Perennial Allergic Rhinoconjunctivitis
Double Blind Placebo Controlled Study to Assess Efficacy and Safety of a Combined Allergen Vaccine (CYT005-AllQbG10) and Its Single Components in Patients With House Dust Mite Allergy
1 other identifier
interventional
40
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The purpose of the study is to test the efficacy of the combination treatment AllQbG10 in patients with perennial allergic rhinoconjunctivitis due to house dust mite allergy in a double-blind, placebo-controlled setting
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_2
Started Sep 2006
Shorter than P25 for phase_2
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2006
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 14, 2007
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 17, 2007
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2008
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2008
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
July 11, 2013
CompletedJuly 11, 2013
February 1, 2013
1.5 years
December 14, 2007
February 14, 2013
June 4, 2013
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Conjunctival Provocation Test (CPT) With House Dust Mite Allergen Solutions. Change of Median Individual Allergen Tolerance Compared to Baseline (Factor of Increase in Allergen Concentration to Induce a Threshold CPT Score ≥ 2)
The outcome measure is a conjunctival provocation test (CPT) with house dust mite allergen solutions. CPT score was measured as a sum of the following assessed symptoms: conjunctival hyperemia, tearing, itching, burning and swelling of eyelids. Each of the assessed symptom could be absent (0), mild (1 point), moderate (2 points) or severe (3 points). The provocation tests started with the maximal dilution of the allergen 1:1000. If the sum of the reached CPT score was \<10 points, the test continued with the next dilution step 1:100. This procedure was repeated until patients reached the CPT score ≥ 10 points or the provocation solution reached the maximal concentration 1:1 (undiluted). The outcome is then given as the change of median individual allergen tolerance at month two compared to baseline. The change is expressed as a factor of increase in allergen concentration to induce a threshold CPT score ≥ 2.
baseline versus 2 months after baseline
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Safety and Tolerability of the Study Treatment by Collection of Adverse Events
about 30 min. at each visit
Study Arms (4)
1
EXPERIMENTAL2
PLACEBO COMPARATOR3
EXPERIMENTAL4
PLACEBO COMPARATORInterventions
subcutaneous injections at 6 visits
subcutaneous injections at 6 visits
subcutaneous injections at 6 visits
subcutaneous injections at 6 visits
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Mild to moderate perennial allergic rhinoconjunctivitis due to hypersensitization towards house dust mite allergens
You may not qualify if:
- Clinically relevant other allergies (perennial or seasonal) that could potentially interfere with the patient's study treatment schedule or assessments
- Use of any concomitant medication that could affect the patient's study treatment response or assessment results
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Head of Clinical Develpment
- Organization
- Cytos Biotechnology AG
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Philipp Mueller, MD
Cytos Biotechnology
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- GT60
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 14, 2007
First Posted
December 17, 2007
Study Start
September 1, 2006
Primary Completion
March 1, 2008
Study Completion
March 1, 2008
Last Updated
July 11, 2013
Results First Posted
July 11, 2013
Record last verified: 2013-02