NCT00567398

Brief Summary

Primary Objective: To demonstrate that use of glucose sparing prescriptions (PEN vs Dianeal) in diabetic (Type 1 and Type 2) Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis (CAPD)and Automated Peritoneal Dialysis (APD) patients leads to improved metabolic control as measured by the magnitude of change from the baseline value in the HbA1c levels. Secondary Objectives: To demonstrate that use of glucose-sparing PD solutions (PEN vs Dianeal) in diabetic (Type 1 and Type 2) CAPD and APD patients leads to lower glycemic-control medication requirements, decreased incidence of severe hypoglycemic events requiring medical intervention, improved metabolic control, nutritional status, and Quality of Life. In a subgroup of patients, the impact of glucose-sparing PD solutions (PEN vs Dianeal only) on abdominal fat and left ventricular (LV) structure and function will be assessed.

Trial Health

90
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
43

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for phase_3

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2008

Typical duration for phase_3

Geographic Reach
3 countries

16 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 4, 2007

Completed
1 day until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 5, 2007

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 1, 2008

Completed
3.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 1, 2011

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 1, 2011

Completed
7.9 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

June 3, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

July 22, 2025

Status Verified

July 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

3.2 years

First QC Date

December 4, 2007

Results QC Date

November 14, 2017

Last Update Submit

July 3, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

ESRDDiabetesCAPDAPD

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Change From the Baseline Value in HbA1c at Month 3 and 6

    HbA1c is a specific glycohemoglobin, and adduct of glucose attached to the beta-chain terminal valine residue. Measured using a Tina-quant immunological assay suitable for samples from end stage renal disease (ESRD) patients and with icodextrin metabolites or equivalent. Statistical analysis includes estimates of Least Squares (LS) comparing differences between treatment groups by visit and p-value using analysis of covariance (ANOVA) testing that the differences=0.

    Baseline, Month 3, Month 6 (End of Study)

Secondary Outcomes (21)

  • Change From Baseline in Glycemic Control Medication Usage at Month 3 and 6

    Baseline, Month 3, Month 6 (End of Study)

  • Number of Severe Hypoglycemic Event Requiring Medical Intervention

    Baseline through Month 6 (End of Study)

  • Change From Baseline of Metabolic Control Determined by Lipid Profile and Triglycerides at Month 3 and 6

    Baseline, Month 3, Month 6 (End of Study)

  • Change From Baseline of Metabolic Control Determined by Lipoproteins at Month 3 and 6

    Baseline, Month 3, Month 6 (End of Study)

  • Change From Baseline of Metabolic Control Determined by Insulin Action of Insulin and C-peptide at Month 3 and 6

    Baseline, Month 3, Month 6 (End of Study)

  • +16 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

non glucose sparing

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Dianeal only

Drug: Dianeal

Glucose sparing

EXPERIMENTAL

Physioneal, Extraneal, Nutrineal

Drug: PhysionealDrug: ExtranealDrug: Nutrineal

Interventions

Dianeal 1.5% Dextrose (1.38% Glucose), 2.5% Dextrose (2.27% Glucose), 4.25% Dextrose (3.86% Glucose)

non glucose sparing

Physioneal 40 or Physioneal 35

Glucose sparing

Extraneal - 7.5% Icodextrin

Glucose sparing

Nutrineal - 1.1% Amino Acids

Glucose sparing

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • M/F patients 18 years of age or older
  • Diagnosis of ESRD (GFR ≤ 15 mL/min)
  • CAPD or APD using only Dianeal and/or Physioneal, at least 1 exchange of 2.5% or 4.25% dextrose/day, no prescribed dry time
  • DM (Type 1 and 2) on glycemic-control medication, for 90 days
  • HbA1c \> 6.0% but ≤ 12.0%
  • Blood hemoglobin ≥ 8.0 g/dL, but ≤ 13.0 g/dL

You may not qualify if:

  • Cardiovascular event within the last 90 days
  • Ongoing clinically significant congestive heart failure (NYHA class III or IV)
  • Allergy to starch-based polymers
  • Glycogen storage disease
  • Glycogen storage disease
  • Peritonitis, exit-site or tunnel infection treated with antibiotics within last 30 days
  • Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP) ≥ 125 mm Hg, or volume depleted (MAP \< 77) at Screening.
  • Serum urea \> 30 mmol/L
  • Receiving rosiglitazone maleate

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (16)

Royal Prince Alfred Hospital

Camperdown, New South Wales, 2050, Australia

Location

Westmead Hospital

Sydney, New South Wales, 2145, Australia

Location

Liverpool Hospital

Sydney, New South Wales, 2170, Australia

Location

Wollongong Hospital

Wollongong, New South Wales, 2500, Australia

Location

Princess Alexandra Hospital

Brisbane, Queensland, 4102, Australia

Location

Flinders Medical Centre

Adelaide, South Australia, 5042, Australia

Location

Monash Medical Centre

Clayton, Victoria, 3168, Australia

Location

St. Vincent's Hospital

Fitzroy, Victoria, 3065, Australia

Location

Gold Coast Hospital

Southport, 4215, Australia

Location

Saint Boniface General Hospital

Winnipeg, Manitoba, R2H 2A6, Canada

Location

Beausejour Hospital Corporation

Moncton, New Brunswick, E1A1J9, Canada

Location

University Health Network, Toronto General Hospital

Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2C4, Canada

Location

Montreal General Hospital

Montreal, Quebec, H3G1A4, Canada

Location

Royal Victoria Hospital

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Location

Auckland Hospital

Grafton, Auckland, New Zealand

Location

Waikato DHB

Hamilton, Waikato Region, New Zealand

Location

Related Publications (6)

  • Gokal R. Taking peritoneal dialysis beyond the year 2000. Perit Dial Int. 1999;19 Suppl 3:S35-42; discussion S43.

    PMID: 10433550BACKGROUND
  • Delarue J, Maingourd C, Couet C, Vidal S, Bagros P, Lamisse F. Effects of oral glucose on intermediary metabolism in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis patients versus healthy subjects. Perit Dial Int. 1998 Sep-Oct;18(5):505-11.

    PMID: 9848629BACKGROUND
  • Holmes CJ, Shockley TR. Strategies to reduce glucose exposure in peritoneal dialysis patients. Perit Dial Int. 2000;20 Suppl 2:S37-41.

    PMID: 10911641BACKGROUND
  • Furuya R, Odamaki M, Kumagai H, Hishida A. Beneficial effects of icodextrin on plasma level of adipocytokines in peritoneal dialysis patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2006 Feb;21(2):494-8. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfi197. Epub 2005 Oct 12.

    PMID: 16221697BACKGROUND
  • Nundy S, Baron JH. The use of neutral red as a peroperative test of vagal innervation. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1975;10(8):847-50.

    PMID: 1202618BACKGROUND
  • Martikainen T, Teppo AM, Gronhagen-Riska C, Ekstrand A. Benefit of glucose-free dialysis solutions on glucose and lipid metabolism in peritoneal dialysis patients. Blood Purif. 2005;23(4):303-10. doi: 10.1159/000086553. Epub 2005 Jun 23.

    PMID: 15980620BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Kidney Failure, ChronicDiabetes Mellitus

Interventions

IcodextrinNutrineal

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Renal Insufficiency, ChronicRenal InsufficiencyKidney DiseasesUrologic DiseasesFemale Urogenital DiseasesFemale Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy ComplicationsUrogenital DiseasesMale Urogenital DiseasesChronic DiseaseDisease AttributesPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsGlucose Metabolism DisordersMetabolic DiseasesNutritional and Metabolic DiseasesEndocrine System Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

GlucansBiopolymersPolymersMacromolecular SubstancesPolysaccharidesCarbohydrates

Limitations and Caveats

This is a pooled analysis of NCT00567489, NCT00567398, and NCT01219959. Given that the glucose content of the PD solutions were similar, the pooling of the results were considered a valid method to answer the underlying research questions.

Results Point of Contact

Title
Clinical Trials Disclosure Group
Organization
Vantive

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 4, 2007

First Posted

December 5, 2007

Study Start

April 1, 2008

Primary Completion

July 1, 2011

Study Completion

July 1, 2011

Last Updated

July 22, 2025

Results First Posted

June 3, 2019

Record last verified: 2025-07

Locations