IMPENDIA- PEN VS Dianeal Only Improved Metabolic Control In Diabetic CAPD and APD Patients
Impendia
Multi-center,Prospective, Randomized Trial ToDemonstrate Improved Metabolic Control of PEN VS Dianeal In Diabetic CAPD and APD Patients - The Impendia Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
43
3 countries
16
Brief Summary
Primary Objective: To demonstrate that use of glucose sparing prescriptions (PEN vs Dianeal) in diabetic (Type 1 and Type 2) Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis (CAPD)and Automated Peritoneal Dialysis (APD) patients leads to improved metabolic control as measured by the magnitude of change from the baseline value in the HbA1c levels. Secondary Objectives: To demonstrate that use of glucose-sparing PD solutions (PEN vs Dianeal) in diabetic (Type 1 and Type 2) CAPD and APD patients leads to lower glycemic-control medication requirements, decreased incidence of severe hypoglycemic events requiring medical intervention, improved metabolic control, nutritional status, and Quality of Life. In a subgroup of patients, the impact of glucose-sparing PD solutions (PEN vs Dianeal only) on abdominal fat and left ventricular (LV) structure and function will be assessed.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_3
Started Apr 2008
Typical duration for phase_3
16 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 4, 2007
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 5, 2007
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2008
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2011
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2011
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
June 3, 2019
CompletedJuly 22, 2025
July 1, 2025
3.2 years
December 4, 2007
November 14, 2017
July 3, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change From the Baseline Value in HbA1c at Month 3 and 6
HbA1c is a specific glycohemoglobin, and adduct of glucose attached to the beta-chain terminal valine residue. Measured using a Tina-quant immunological assay suitable for samples from end stage renal disease (ESRD) patients and with icodextrin metabolites or equivalent. Statistical analysis includes estimates of Least Squares (LS) comparing differences between treatment groups by visit and p-value using analysis of covariance (ANOVA) testing that the differences=0.
Baseline, Month 3, Month 6 (End of Study)
Secondary Outcomes (21)
Change From Baseline in Glycemic Control Medication Usage at Month 3 and 6
Baseline, Month 3, Month 6 (End of Study)
Number of Severe Hypoglycemic Event Requiring Medical Intervention
Baseline through Month 6 (End of Study)
Change From Baseline of Metabolic Control Determined by Lipid Profile and Triglycerides at Month 3 and 6
Baseline, Month 3, Month 6 (End of Study)
Change From Baseline of Metabolic Control Determined by Lipoproteins at Month 3 and 6
Baseline, Month 3, Month 6 (End of Study)
Change From Baseline of Metabolic Control Determined by Insulin Action of Insulin and C-peptide at Month 3 and 6
Baseline, Month 3, Month 6 (End of Study)
- +16 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
non glucose sparing
ACTIVE COMPARATORDianeal only
Glucose sparing
EXPERIMENTALPhysioneal, Extraneal, Nutrineal
Interventions
Dianeal 1.5% Dextrose (1.38% Glucose), 2.5% Dextrose (2.27% Glucose), 4.25% Dextrose (3.86% Glucose)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- M/F patients 18 years of age or older
- Diagnosis of ESRD (GFR ≤ 15 mL/min)
- CAPD or APD using only Dianeal and/or Physioneal, at least 1 exchange of 2.5% or 4.25% dextrose/day, no prescribed dry time
- DM (Type 1 and 2) on glycemic-control medication, for 90 days
- HbA1c \> 6.0% but ≤ 12.0%
- Blood hemoglobin ≥ 8.0 g/dL, but ≤ 13.0 g/dL
You may not qualify if:
- Cardiovascular event within the last 90 days
- Ongoing clinically significant congestive heart failure (NYHA class III or IV)
- Allergy to starch-based polymers
- Glycogen storage disease
- Glycogen storage disease
- Peritonitis, exit-site or tunnel infection treated with antibiotics within last 30 days
- Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP) ≥ 125 mm Hg, or volume depleted (MAP \< 77) at Screening.
- Serum urea \> 30 mmol/L
- Receiving rosiglitazone maleate
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Vantive Health LLClead
- Baxter Healthcare Corporationcollaborator
Study Sites (16)
Royal Prince Alfred Hospital
Camperdown, New South Wales, 2050, Australia
Westmead Hospital
Sydney, New South Wales, 2145, Australia
Liverpool Hospital
Sydney, New South Wales, 2170, Australia
Wollongong Hospital
Wollongong, New South Wales, 2500, Australia
Princess Alexandra Hospital
Brisbane, Queensland, 4102, Australia
Flinders Medical Centre
Adelaide, South Australia, 5042, Australia
Monash Medical Centre
Clayton, Victoria, 3168, Australia
St. Vincent's Hospital
Fitzroy, Victoria, 3065, Australia
Gold Coast Hospital
Southport, 4215, Australia
Saint Boniface General Hospital
Winnipeg, Manitoba, R2H 2A6, Canada
Beausejour Hospital Corporation
Moncton, New Brunswick, E1A1J9, Canada
University Health Network, Toronto General Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2C4, Canada
Montreal General Hospital
Montreal, Quebec, H3G1A4, Canada
Royal Victoria Hospital
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Auckland Hospital
Grafton, Auckland, New Zealand
Waikato DHB
Hamilton, Waikato Region, New Zealand
Related Publications (6)
Gokal R. Taking peritoneal dialysis beyond the year 2000. Perit Dial Int. 1999;19 Suppl 3:S35-42; discussion S43.
PMID: 10433550BACKGROUNDDelarue J, Maingourd C, Couet C, Vidal S, Bagros P, Lamisse F. Effects of oral glucose on intermediary metabolism in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis patients versus healthy subjects. Perit Dial Int. 1998 Sep-Oct;18(5):505-11.
PMID: 9848629BACKGROUNDHolmes CJ, Shockley TR. Strategies to reduce glucose exposure in peritoneal dialysis patients. Perit Dial Int. 2000;20 Suppl 2:S37-41.
PMID: 10911641BACKGROUNDFuruya R, Odamaki M, Kumagai H, Hishida A. Beneficial effects of icodextrin on plasma level of adipocytokines in peritoneal dialysis patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2006 Feb;21(2):494-8. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfi197. Epub 2005 Oct 12.
PMID: 16221697BACKGROUNDNundy S, Baron JH. The use of neutral red as a peroperative test of vagal innervation. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1975;10(8):847-50.
PMID: 1202618BACKGROUNDMartikainen T, Teppo AM, Gronhagen-Riska C, Ekstrand A. Benefit of glucose-free dialysis solutions on glucose and lipid metabolism in peritoneal dialysis patients. Blood Purif. 2005;23(4):303-10. doi: 10.1159/000086553. Epub 2005 Jun 23.
PMID: 15980620BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
This is a pooled analysis of NCT00567489, NCT00567398, and NCT01219959. Given that the glucose content of the PD solutions were similar, the pooling of the results were considered a valid method to answer the underlying research questions.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Clinical Trials Disclosure Group
- Organization
- Vantive
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 4, 2007
First Posted
December 5, 2007
Study Start
April 1, 2008
Primary Completion
July 1, 2011
Study Completion
July 1, 2011
Last Updated
July 22, 2025
Results First Posted
June 3, 2019
Record last verified: 2025-07