Major Outcomes in Elderly Patients With Self-Management of Oral Anticoagulation (SPOG60+)
SPOG60+
Impact of Self-Management of Oral Anticoagulation in the Elderly in Terms of Mortality and Morbidity: a Randomized Controlled Trial - SPOG 60+
1 other identifier
interventional
216
2 countries
3
Brief Summary
Self-management is safe and reliable in patients with long-term oral anticoagulation (OAC). However, no study has yet assessed the safety and efficacy of OAC self-management in elderly patients with major thromboembolic and haemorrhagic complications as primary outcomes. In this multi-centre, open, randomised controlled trial, patients aged 60 years or will be randomised into a self-management or routine care group and followed up for at least two years. The primary hypothesis of the study is that self-management of oral anticoagulation is superior compared to routine control in terms of reducing thromboembolic events requiring hospitalisation and all major bleeding complications as the primary endpoint.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_4
Started Mar 2002
Longer than P75 for phase_4
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2002
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2007
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 17, 2007
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 20, 2007
CompletedNovember 20, 2007
November 1, 2007
November 17, 2007
November 17, 2007
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
combined endpoint of all thromboembolic events requiring hospitalisation and all major bleeding complications
during the time of follow up (at least two years)
Secondary Outcomes (8)
frequency and duration of hospitalisation
during the time of follow up (at least two years)
mortality
during the time of follow up (at least two years)
recurrence of stroke
during the time of follow up (at least two years)
numbers of INR values above 4.5 or lower than 1.7
during the time of follow up (at least two years)
treatment-related quality of life analysis
during the time of follow up (at least two years)
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
1Self-management
OTHER2 Routine control
OTHERInterventions
Patients in the self-management group participated in 4 consecutive weekly instruction sessions of 90 to 120 minutes each, in groups of 3 to 6 patients. After participation in the structured programme, the patients were encouraged to control their INR values by self-monitoring once a week and to adjust their anticoagulant dosage accordingly.
Patients in the routine control group participated a single 90-minute session During the whole study period, they were advised with regard to changes in the anticoagulant dosage by their usual attending physicians, either in general practice or at a hospital-based specialised anticoagulation clinic.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- long-term anticoagulation
- either with phenprocoumon or acenocoumarol
- age ≥ 60 years
- written informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- previous participation in a self-management OAC programme
- severe cognitive
- terminal illness
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Medical University of Grazlead
- Boehringer Mannheimcollaborator
Study Sites (3)
Medical University Graz
Graz, Styria, 8036, Austria
Medical University of Vienna
Vienna, 1090, Austria
DIeM - Institute for Evidence-based Medicine
Cologne, 50823, Germany
Related Publications (1)
Siebenhofer A, Rakovac I, Kleespies C, Piso B, Didjurgeit U. Self-management of oral anticoagulation in the elderly: rationale, design, baselines and oral anticoagulation control after one year of follow-up. A randomized controlled trial. Thromb Haemost. 2007 Mar;97(3):408-16.
PMID: 17334508RESULT
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ulrike Didjurgeit, psychologist
DIeM - Institute for Evidence-based Medicine, Cologne, Germany
- STUDY CHAIR
Andrea Siebenhofer, consultant
Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Austria
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 17, 2007
First Posted
November 20, 2007
Study Start
March 1, 2002
Study Completion
February 1, 2007
Last Updated
November 20, 2007
Record last verified: 2007-11