NCT00558142

Brief Summary

Millions of people receive radiographic contrast material for investigations like CT and coronary angiography. While considered safe in healthy patients, it can cause acute renal impairment. This is termed radiocontrast-induced nephropathy (RCIN) and is generally defined as an increase in serum creatinine over baseline of more than 25% or 0.5 mg/dL (44.2 μmol/l) within 48 hrs. RCIN occurs in less than 2% of patients with normal renal function but is more common in patients with pre-existing renal damage. The pathophysiology of RCIN is unclear. Possible mechanisms involve 1) reduced renal blood flow leading to acute tubular necrosis and 2) direct renal tubular injury by oxygen free radicals. Current prevention strategies focus on increasing renal blood flow and reducing oxidative stress. Patients at risk of RCIN currently receive fluids, a low dose of contrast, and variable and unproven doses of acetylcysteine. The evidence for acetylcysteine administration is unclear. A RCIN consensus working group reported in the American Journal of Cardiology in September 2006 that "N-acetylcysteine is not consistently effective in reducing the risk for contrast-induced nephropathy". The perception of a benefit from acetylcysteine administration that is unproven has disadvantages as some clinicians report giving larger amounts of radio-contrast to patients who have received acetylcysteine since they believe that it prevents RCIN. There is a need to determine how acetylcysteine might prevent RCIN and to identify the appropriate dose and route of administration. Since acetylcysteine is a vasodilator as well as an antioxidant, it may work in two distinct ways, by preventing reduction in renal blood flow (RBF) or contrast-induced oxidative damage. Previous studies have used changes in serum creatinine. In addition to being an insensitive marker of altered renal function, if contrast causes renal vasoconstriction and acetylcysteine vasodilatation, changes in serum creatinine will not be the ideal marker of effect. Finally the optimum dose and route of acetylcysteine administration is unclear, as illustrated by studies using a variety of doses and routes. We propose to study the mechanism of effects of acetylcysteine on healthy and diseased kidneys, both unstressed and stressed by radiocontrast administration. We hypothesise that acetylcysteine may exert a renoprotective effect in RCIN by a renal vasodilatation and/or antioxidant mechanism.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
107

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for phase_4

Timeline
Completed

Started Feb 2008

Longer than P75 for phase_4

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 13, 2007

Completed
1 day until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 14, 2007

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 1, 2008

Completed
6.9 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 1, 2015

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 1, 2015

Completed
9.7 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

September 19, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

September 19, 2024

Status Verified

April 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

6.9 years

First QC Date

November 13, 2007

Results QC Date

April 28, 2021

Last Update Submit

May 14, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

contrast nephropathyradiocontrast-induced nephropathychronic kidney diseaseacetylcysteineclinical study

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Changes in Renal Blood Flow

    Measurement of change in renal blood flow through para-aminohippuric acid (PAH) elimination

    0, 2, 2.25, 2.5, 4, 6, and 8 hrs

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Changes in Glomerular Filtration Rate

    0, 2, 2.25, 2.5, 4, 6, and 8 hrs

Study Arms (4)

1

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Healthy volunteers will be randomised to receive either placebo capsules PO plus an infusion of normal saline, acetylcysteine capsules PO plus an infusion of normal saline or placebo capsules PO plus an IV infusion of acetylcysteine in normal saline

Drug: Acetylcysteine

2

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Volunteers with CKD III will be randomised to receive either placebo capsules PO plus an infusion of normal saline, acetylcysteine capsules PO plus an infusion of normal saline or placebo capsules PO plus an IV infusion of acetylcysteine in normal saline

Drug: Acetylcysteine

3

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Healthy volunteers will receive a single IV dose of 100mls Visipaque 320 (iodixanol, equivalent to 320 mg iodine/ml). They will then be randomised to receive either placebo capsules PO plus an infusion of normal saline, acetylcysteine capsules PO plus an infusion of normal saline or placebo capsules PO plus an IV infusion of acetylcysteine in normal saline

Drug: AcetylcysteineDrug: Visipaque 320

4

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Volunteers with CKD III will receive Visipaque 320 during coronary angiography. They will have been randomised to receive either placebo capsules PO plus an infusion of normal saline, acetylcysteine capsules PO plus an infusion of normal saline or placebo capsules PO plus an IV infusion of acetylcysteine in normal saline

Drug: AcetylcysteineDrug: Visipaque 320

Interventions

Participants will receive packs of either 8 placebo capsules or 8 acetylcysteine (600mg) capsules. They will be asked to take 2 tablets at 08.00 and 22.00 on the day before the study and the day of the study. On the day of the study participants will receive an IV infusion of either normal saline or acetylcysteine (200mg/kg)

Also known as: Parvolex
1234

100mls IV dose as single dose

Also known as: Iodixanol
3

Eligibility Criteria

Age45 Years+
Sexmale
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Study 1 and 3: Healthy male volunteers over 45 years of age with BMI between 22 and 40.
  • Study 2: Male volunteers with CKD III with BMI between 22 and 40.
  • Study 4: Male patients over 45 year of age with stable CKD III and BMI between 22 and 40, undergoing elective coronary angiography.

You may not qualify if:

  • Lack of informed consent
  • Age \<46 years
  • Current involvement in a clinical trial
  • Clinically significant co-morbidity: heart failure, hypertension, known hyperlipidaemia, diabetes mellitus, coagulopathy, peripheral vascular disease, or bleeding disorder
  • thyroid disease, myasthenia gravis, asthma, atopy, or a history of allergy/sensitivity to acetylcysteine or contrast medium
  • current intake of prescription medicines, in particular beta blockers
  • recent infective/inflammatory condition
  • blood donation during the preceding three months
  • Lack of informed consent
  • Age \<46 years
  • Current involvement in a clinical trial
  • Thyroid disease, myasthenia gravis, asthma, atopy, or a history of allergy/sensitivity to acetylcysteine or contrast medium
  • Recent infective/inflammatory condition
  • Blood donation during the preceding three months

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Clinical Research Facility, Royal Infirmary Edinburgh

Edinburgh, Midlothian, EH16 4SA, United Kingdom

Location

Related Publications (6)

  • Parfrey P. The clinical epidemiology of contrast-induced nephropathy. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2005;28 Suppl 2:S3-11. doi: 10.1007/s00270-005-0196-8.

    PMID: 16419277BACKGROUND
  • Gleeson TG, Bulugahapitiya S. Contrast-induced nephropathy. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004 Dec;183(6):1673-89. doi: 10.2214/ajr.183.6.01831673. No abstract available.

    PMID: 15547209BACKGROUND
  • Stacul F. Reducing the risks for contrast-induced nephropathy. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2005;28 Suppl 2:S12-8. doi: 10.1007/s00270-005-0197-7.

    PMID: 16419278BACKGROUND
  • Marenzi G, Assanelli E, Marana I, Lauri G, Campodonico J, Grazi M, De Metrio M, Galli S, Fabbiocchi F, Montorsi P, Veglia F, Bartorelli AL. N-acetylcysteine and contrast-induced nephropathy in primary angioplasty. N Engl J Med. 2006 Jun 29;354(26):2773-82. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa054209.

    PMID: 16807414BACKGROUND
  • Eddleston M, Goddard J, Bateman N. N-acetylcysteine for contrast nephropathy: more clinical science is required. Arch Intern Med. 2006 Aug 14-28;166(15):1668-9; author reply 1669. doi: 10.1001/archinte.166.15.1668-b. No abstract available.

    PMID: 16908804BACKGROUND
  • Sandilands EA, Cameron S, Paterson F, Donaldson S, Briody L, Crowe J, Donnelly J, Thompson A, Johnston NR, Mackenzie I, Uren N, Goddard J, Webb DJ, Megson IL, Bateman N, Eddleston M. Mechanisms for an effect of acetylcysteine on renal function after exposure to radio-graphic contrast material: study protocol. BMC Clin Pharmacol. 2012 Feb 3;12:3. doi: 10.1186/1472-6904-12-3.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Renal Insufficiency, Chronic

Interventions

AcetylcysteineN-monoacetylcystineiodixanol

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Renal InsufficiencyKidney DiseasesUrologic DiseasesFemale Urogenital DiseasesFemale Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy ComplicationsUrogenital DiseasesMale Urogenital DiseasesChronic DiseaseDisease AttributesPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

CysteineAmino Acids, SulfurSulfur CompoundsOrganic ChemicalsAmino AcidsAmino Acids, Peptides, and Proteins

Results Point of Contact

Title
Prof M Eddleston
Organization
University of Edinburgh

Study Officials

  • Michael Eddleston, MA PhD MCRP

    University of Edinburgh

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 13, 2007

First Posted

November 14, 2007

Study Start

February 1, 2008

Primary Completion

January 1, 2015

Study Completion

January 1, 2015

Last Updated

September 19, 2024

Results First Posted

September 19, 2024

Record last verified: 2021-04

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations