NCT00552864

Brief Summary

In High Thoracic Epidural Anesthesia (HTEA) the use of a local anesthetic (LA) with low cardiac toxicity is crucial as myocardial contractility is often already seriously impaired. The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy, doses and side effects of ropivacaine and levobupivacaine in patients submitted to coronary artery bypass graft with HTEA and general anesthesia. The primary end point is the amount of LA drug required to maintain a VAS \< 4 when coughing in the first 24 postoperative hours.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
61

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for phase_4

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2003

Typical duration for phase_4

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2003

Completed
2.4 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 1, 2005

Completed
2.4 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 31, 2007

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 2, 2007

Completed
Last Updated

November 2, 2007

Status Verified

October 1, 2007

First QC Date

October 31, 2007

Last Update Submit

October 31, 2007

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • The amount of local anesthetic drug (mg) required to maintain a visual analog scale score for pain (VAS) < 4 when coughing.

    the first 24 postoperative hours

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • - The onset time of a T1-T6 block after the bolus. - the amount of norepinephrine needed to maintain MAP > 70. - differences in motor block. - side effects.

    The first 24 postoperative hours

Study Arms (2)

R

ACTIVE COMPARATOR
Drug: Ropivacaine

L

ACTIVE COMPARATOR
Drug: Levobupivacaine

Interventions

0.5% epidural bolus injection (0.1 mL kg-1) with sufentanil 2.5 µg mL-1 before general anesthesia induction, followed by 0.2% infusion (0.1 mL kg-1 h-1) with sufentanil 1 µg mL-1 throughout surgery; in ICU, 0.1% epidural infusion with sufentanil 1µg mL-1 at 0.1 mL kg-1 h-1 and the rate is modified following this protocol: on awakening (Ramsay 2) VAS on coughing is evaluated: if it is 4 the infusion rate is not changed, if the VAS is ≥ 4 the rate is increased by 2 mL h-1 after giving a 2 mL bolus and VAS is checked again 30 minutes later, if it is ≤ 4 the infusion rate is decreased by 2 mL h-1.

Also known as: Naropina
R

0.5% epidural bolus injection (0.1 mL kg-1) with sufentanil 2.5 µg mL-1 before general anesthesia induction, followed by 0.2% infusion (0.1 mL kg-1 h-1) with sufentanil 1 µg mL-1 throughout surgery; in ICU, 0.1% epidural infusion with sufentanil 1µg mL-1 at 0.1 mL kg-1 h-1 and the rate is modified following this protocol: on awakening (Ramsay 2) VAS on coughing is evaluated: if it is 4 the infusion rate is not changed, if the VAS is ≥ 4 the rate is increased by 2 mL h-1 after giving a 2 mL bolus and VAS is checked again 30 minutes later, if it is ≤ 4 the infusion rate is decreased by 2 mL h-1.

Also known as: Chirocaina
L

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 80 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients scheduled for coronary artery bypass grafting
  • with stable angina
  • left ventricular ejection fraction \> 30%
  • age \> 18 years
  • having signed a written informed consent.
  • Prothrombin Time (PT) \> 80% and Partial Thromboplastin Time (PTT) within the normal range, and platelet counts (PLT) \> 100.000 /mL

You may not qualify if:

  • emergency operation
  • known coagulation disorders or recent thrombolytic therapy
  • angina on arrival in the operating room
  • acute myocardial infarction within the previous seven days
  • clinically significant associated valvular disease
  • known neuraxial pathology
  • patients participating in other clinical research protocols.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Department of Anesthesia & ICU. IRCCS Centro Cardiologico Monzino

Milan, 20138, Italy

Location

Related Publications (2)

  • Olivier JF, Le N, Choiniere JL, Prieto I, Basile F, Hemmerling T. Comparison of three different epidural solutions in off-pump cardiac surgery: pilot study. Br J Anaesth. 2005 Nov;95(5):685-91. doi: 10.1093/bja/aei238. Epub 2005 Sep 23.

    PMID: 16183682BACKGROUND
  • Casati A, Putzu M. Bupivacaine, levobupivacaine and ropivacaine: are they clinically different? Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2005 Jun;19(2):247-68. doi: 10.1016/j.bpa.2004.12.003.

    PMID: 15966496BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Interventions

RopivacaineLevobupivacaine

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

AnilidesAmidesOrganic ChemicalsAniline CompoundsAminesBupivacaine

Study Officials

  • Luca Salvi, MD

    Department of Anesthesia & ICU. IRCCS Centro Cardiologico Monzino.

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 31, 2007

First Posted

November 2, 2007

Study Start

January 1, 2003

Study Completion

June 1, 2005

Last Updated

November 2, 2007

Record last verified: 2007-10

Locations