Comparison of Ropivacaine and Levobupivacaine in High Thoracic Epidural Anesthesia
High Thoracic Epidural Anesthesia and Postoperative Analgesia With Ropivacaine or Levobupivacaine for Coronary Surgery: A Prospective Randomized Double-Blind Comparison
1 other identifier
interventional
61
1 country
1
Brief Summary
In High Thoracic Epidural Anesthesia (HTEA) the use of a local anesthetic (LA) with low cardiac toxicity is crucial as myocardial contractility is often already seriously impaired. The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy, doses and side effects of ropivacaine and levobupivacaine in patients submitted to coronary artery bypass graft with HTEA and general anesthesia. The primary end point is the amount of LA drug required to maintain a VAS \< 4 when coughing in the first 24 postoperative hours.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_4
Started Jan 2003
Typical duration for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2003
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2005
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 31, 2007
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 2, 2007
CompletedNovember 2, 2007
October 1, 2007
October 31, 2007
October 31, 2007
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The amount of local anesthetic drug (mg) required to maintain a visual analog scale score for pain (VAS) < 4 when coughing.
the first 24 postoperative hours
Secondary Outcomes (1)
- The onset time of a T1-T6 block after the bolus. - the amount of norepinephrine needed to maintain MAP > 70. - differences in motor block. - side effects.
The first 24 postoperative hours
Study Arms (2)
R
ACTIVE COMPARATORL
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions
0.5% epidural bolus injection (0.1 mL kg-1) with sufentanil 2.5 µg mL-1 before general anesthesia induction, followed by 0.2% infusion (0.1 mL kg-1 h-1) with sufentanil 1 µg mL-1 throughout surgery; in ICU, 0.1% epidural infusion with sufentanil 1µg mL-1 at 0.1 mL kg-1 h-1 and the rate is modified following this protocol: on awakening (Ramsay 2) VAS on coughing is evaluated: if it is 4 the infusion rate is not changed, if the VAS is ≥ 4 the rate is increased by 2 mL h-1 after giving a 2 mL bolus and VAS is checked again 30 minutes later, if it is ≤ 4 the infusion rate is decreased by 2 mL h-1.
0.5% epidural bolus injection (0.1 mL kg-1) with sufentanil 2.5 µg mL-1 before general anesthesia induction, followed by 0.2% infusion (0.1 mL kg-1 h-1) with sufentanil 1 µg mL-1 throughout surgery; in ICU, 0.1% epidural infusion with sufentanil 1µg mL-1 at 0.1 mL kg-1 h-1 and the rate is modified following this protocol: on awakening (Ramsay 2) VAS on coughing is evaluated: if it is 4 the infusion rate is not changed, if the VAS is ≥ 4 the rate is increased by 2 mL h-1 after giving a 2 mL bolus and VAS is checked again 30 minutes later, if it is ≤ 4 the infusion rate is decreased by 2 mL h-1.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients scheduled for coronary artery bypass grafting
- with stable angina
- left ventricular ejection fraction \> 30%
- age \> 18 years
- having signed a written informed consent.
- Prothrombin Time (PT) \> 80% and Partial Thromboplastin Time (PTT) within the normal range, and platelet counts (PLT) \> 100.000 /mL
You may not qualify if:
- emergency operation
- known coagulation disorders or recent thrombolytic therapy
- angina on arrival in the operating room
- acute myocardial infarction within the previous seven days
- clinically significant associated valvular disease
- known neuraxial pathology
- patients participating in other clinical research protocols.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Department of Anesthesia & ICU. IRCCS Centro Cardiologico Monzino
Milan, 20138, Italy
Related Publications (2)
Olivier JF, Le N, Choiniere JL, Prieto I, Basile F, Hemmerling T. Comparison of three different epidural solutions in off-pump cardiac surgery: pilot study. Br J Anaesth. 2005 Nov;95(5):685-91. doi: 10.1093/bja/aei238. Epub 2005 Sep 23.
PMID: 16183682BACKGROUNDCasati A, Putzu M. Bupivacaine, levobupivacaine and ropivacaine: are they clinically different? Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2005 Jun;19(2):247-68. doi: 10.1016/j.bpa.2004.12.003.
PMID: 15966496BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Luca Salvi, MD
Department of Anesthesia & ICU. IRCCS Centro Cardiologico Monzino.
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 31, 2007
First Posted
November 2, 2007
Study Start
January 1, 2003
Study Completion
June 1, 2005
Last Updated
November 2, 2007
Record last verified: 2007-10