NCT00547638

Brief Summary

This is a multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled study for the purpose of comparing DERMABOND PROTAPE to DERMABOND HVD for closure of wounds in the Emergency Department. The objective of this study is to demonstrate whether the incidence of wound closure for DERMABOND PROTAPE is equivalent to that measured for DERMABOND HVD.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
216

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for phase_2

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2007

Geographic Reach
1 country

9 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 1, 2007

Completed
3 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 17, 2007

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 22, 2007

Completed
1.4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 1, 2009

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 1, 2009

Completed
4.4 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

August 6, 2013

Completed
Last Updated

August 6, 2013

Status Verified

August 1, 2013

Enrollment Period

1.6 years

First QC Date

October 17, 2007

Results QC Date

March 1, 2013

Last Update Submit

August 2, 2013

Conditions

Keywords

laceration/wound closuretopical skin adhesive

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • The Incidence of Wound Closure Post-treatment, as Defined by Continuous Approximation of Wound Margins From the Time of Wound Closure Until the Day of Evaluation Without Dehiscence or Need for Reclosure.

    Data is presented as binomial tables of proportions of successes and failures for each treatment. The 90% two-sided exact confidence intervals (CI) for the differences in the proportions for each study group was calculated. The upper limit of the 90% CI was then taken to represent the upper limit of the one-sided 95% CI. The primary objective of the study was met if the upper limit of the one-sided 95% CI of the difference in proportions (comparator minus treatment) did not exceed 8%.

    14 days (±2 days)

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Cosmesis

    30 days (±5 days)

Other Outcomes (4)

  • The Comparison of Test and Control Arms Regarding Incidence of Clinical Infection at Day 14 and Day 30

    Through Day 30

  • The Incidence and Extent of Local Acute Inflammatory Reactions Including Edema, Erythema, Pain and Local Temperature at Day 14 and Day 30

    At Day 14 and Day 30

  • Incidence of Skin Blistering at Day 14

    Day 14

  • +1 more other outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Dermabond Protape

EXPERIMENTAL

DERMABOND PROTAPE (Prineo) Topical Skin Adhesive

Device: cyanoacrylate with pressure sensitive mesh

Dermabond HVD

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

DERMABOND HVD Topical Skin Adhesive

Device: cyanoacrylate

Interventions

Topical Skin Adhesive

Also known as: Dermabond Protape, Prineo
Dermabond Protape

Topical Skin Adhesive

Also known as: Dermabond - HVD, Dermabond - Protape
Dermabond HVD

Eligibility Criteria

Age1 Year+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • at least 1 year of age
  • in good general health in the opinion of the Investigator.
  • have at least one traumatic wound meeting the criteria for closure as defined in current Dermabond product labeling.
  • patient must be willing to follow instructions for wound care listed in device labeling and refrain from picking at the device, applying topical medications to the wound, and swimming or soaking in a tub until the sutures are removed.
  • patient agrees to return for follow-up evaluation
  • patient (or guardian) signs the informed consent
  • patient is reasonably expected to survive the study

You may not qualify if:

  • significant multiple trauma (merely multiple wounds are allowed)
  • peripheral vascular disease
  • insulin dependent diabetes mellitus
  • known to have a blood clotting disorder
  • receiving antibiotic therapy for preexisting condition or infection
  • known to be HIV-positive or otherwise immunocompromised
  • known personal or family history of keloid formation or hypertrophy
  • currently taking systemic steroids
  • known allergy to cyanoacrylate, formaldehyde, tapes or adhesives
  • participating in another current clinical study
  • history of abnormal wound healing
  • burst stellate lacerations due to a crush or hard blow
  • animal or human bite or scratch
  • decubitus ulcer
  • puncture wound
  • +8 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (9)

NextCare Institute For Clinical Research

Phoenix, Arizona, 85016, United States

Location

Orlando Regional Healthcare System

Orlando, Florida, 32806, United States

Location

Investigators Research Group, LLC

Indianapolis, Indiana, 46268, United States

Location

Tulane Universtiy Hospital & Clinic

New Orleans, Louisiana, 70112, United States

Location

Stony Brook University HSC

Stony Brook, New York, 11794, United States

Location

Duke University Health System

Durham, North Carolina, 27710, United States

Location

Wake Forest University Baptist Medical Center

Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27157, United States

Location

Drexel University Hospital

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19102, United States

Location

Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Lacerations

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Wounds and Injuries

Limitations and Caveats

The percentages of participants who withdrew prematurely from the study from each group could represent a possible study limitation.

Results Point of Contact

Title
John Lombard, Clinical Research Manager
Organization
Ethicon, Inc.

Study Officials

  • Helen Colquhoun, MD

    Pleiad Devices

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
LTE60
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 2
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 17, 2007

First Posted

October 22, 2007

Study Start

August 1, 2007

Primary Completion

March 1, 2009

Study Completion

March 1, 2009

Last Updated

August 6, 2013

Results First Posted

August 6, 2013

Record last verified: 2013-08

Locations