Study to Evaluate Symptoms in Patients Treated With Nebivolol or Metoprolol Extended-release (ER) for Hypertension
Tolerability of Nebivolol Compared With Metoprolol ER in Patients With Mild to Moderate Hypertension Taking Hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ)
1 other identifier
interventional
49
1 country
24
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study was to compare the tolerability of nebivolol to metoprolol ER in a general population of patients with mild to moderate hypertension receiving hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ)
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_3 hypertension
Started Oct 2007
Shorter than P25 for phase_3 hypertension
24 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 19, 2007
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 22, 2007
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 31, 2007
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 2, 2008
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 2, 2008
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
May 21, 2019
CompletedMay 21, 2019
April 1, 2019
2 months
October 19, 2007
October 19, 2010
April 30, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change From Baseline in the Patient Symptoms Questionnaire (PSQ) Derived Score
The PSQ contained 44 possible symptoms rated from 0 (no discomfort) to 5 (extreme discomfort).
Measurements occured over a 14 week period, from Visit 2 (Week -2) to Visit 10 (Week 12)
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Peripheral Blood Pressure (BP)
Measurements occured over a 18 week period, from Visit 1 (Week -4) through Visit 11 (Week 14)
Pulse Rate
Measurements occured over a 18 week period, from Visit 1 (Week -4) through Visit 11 (Week 14)
Study Arms (2)
Nebivolol
EXPERIMENTALNebivolol 5 mg, 10 mg or 20 mg
Metoprolol ER
ACTIVE COMPARATORMetoprolol ER 50 mg, 100 mg or 200 mg
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Male or female, ambulatory outpatients
- History of hypertension being treated with two medications, one of which must be HCTZ and the other of which must not be a beta-blocker or clonidine
- SBP of 135-155 mm Hg and/or DBP of \>85 mm Hg at screening (Visit 1)
- SBP of 140-165 mm Hg and DBP \> 90 mmHg at randomization (Visit 3)
You may not qualify if:
- Treatment with a beta-blocker or clonidine within 6 months of screening (Visit 1)
- Clinically significant respiratory disease (e.g., bronchial asthma, reactive airways disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease)
- Coronary artery disease requiring treatment with a calcium channel blocker or nitrates
- Clinically significant cardiovascular disease (e.g., myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular event, significant arrhythmia) within 6 months of screening (Visit 1)
- History of severe mental illness (including Major Depressive Disorder, psychosis, dementia, bipolar disorder) within 6 months of screening (Visit 1)
- Use of antipsychotic medication (e.g., dopamine receptor antagonists, serotonin dopamine receptor antagonists) or antidepressants
- Diabetes mellitus, type I or II
- Participation in a previous investigational study of nebivolol at any time
- Receipt of treatment with an investigational study drug within 30 days of screening (Visit 1)
- History of hypersensitivity to nebivolol, metoprolol ER, other beta-blockers, HCTZ, or other sulfonamide-derived drugs
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Forest Laboratorieslead
- Mylan Laboratoriescollaborator
Study Sites (24)
Forest Research Institute 014
Birmingham, Alabama, 35205, United States
Forest Research Institute 028
Beverly Hills, California, 90211, United States
Forest Research Institute 054
Encinitas, California, 92024, United States
Forest Research Institute 025
Roseville, California, 95661, United States
Forest Research Institute 013
Tustin, California, 92780, United States
Forest Research Institute 053
Vista, California, 92083, United States
Forest Research Institute 052
Walnut Creek, California, 94598, United States
Forest Research Institute 033
Westlake Village, California, 91361, United States
Forest Research Institute 010
DeLand, Florida, 32720, United States
Forest Research Institute 019
Holly Hill, Florida, 32117, United States
Forest Research Institute 036
Hollywood, Florida, 33023, United States
Forest Research Institute 007
Pembroke Pines, Florida, 33024, United States
Forest Research Institute 009
Atlanta, Georgia, 30338, United States
Forest Research Institute 006
Oxon Hill, Maryland, 20745, United States
Forest Research Institute 027
Las Vegas, Nevada, 89106, United States
Forest Research Institute 050
Salisbury, North Carolina, 28144, United States
Forest Research Institute 039
Wilmington, North Carolina, 28401, United States
Forest Investigative Site 002
Charleston, South Carolina, 29407, United States
Forest Research Institute 032
Greenville, South Carolina, 29615, United States
Forest Research Institute 008
Nashville, Tennessee, 37203, United States
Forest Research Institute 003
Carrollton, Texas, 75006, United States
Forest Research Institute 012
San Antonio, Texas, 78229, United States
Forest Research Institute 048
Sugar Land, Texas, 77479, United States
Forest Research Institute 040
Bountiful, Utah, 84010, United States
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Study was terminated early due to administrative reasons. Formal analyses of primary and secondary endpoints were not conducted in this study.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Therapeutic Area Head
- Organization
- Allergan
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 19, 2007
First Posted
October 22, 2007
Study Start
October 31, 2007
Primary Completion
January 2, 2008
Study Completion
January 2, 2008
Last Updated
May 21, 2019
Results First Posted
May 21, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-04