Efficacy and Safety of NT 201 in the Treatment of Lateral Periorbital Wrinkles
A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind, Multicenter Trial to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of NT 201 in Comparison to Placebo and to Compare Two Different Application Schemes of NT 201 in the Treatment of Lateral Periorbital Wrinkles
2 other identifiers
interventional
111
4 countries
12
Brief Summary
To investigate the efficacy and safety of incobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin) in comparison to placebo in the treatment of moderate to severe lateral periorbital wrinkles at maximum smile and to compare two different application schemes of Xeomin. Each subject will be treated on the right and left eye area, using the same dose but different application schemes (i.e. 3 or 4 injection sites).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_3
Started Sep 2007
Shorter than P25 for phase_3
12 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2007
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 8, 2007
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 10, 2007
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2008
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2008
CompletedMarch 8, 2012
March 1, 2012
5 months
October 8, 2007
March 7, 2012
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Response assessed by an independent rater at maximum smile at week 4 for either eye area compared to baseline.
Responder: subjects with improvement of at least 1 point on a 4 point scale for lateral periorbital wrinkles.
Week 4
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Response assessed by the investigator at maximum smile for either eye area compared to baseline.
Weeks 2, 4, 12, and 20
Response assessed by the subject's global assessment at maximum smile for either eye area compared to baseline.
Weeks 2, 4, 12, and 20
Study Arms (4)
IncobutolinumtoxinA (Xeomin), 4-injection scheme
EXPERIMENTALIncobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin), also known as 'NT 201' or 'Botulinum toxin type A (150kD), free of complexing proteins' (active ingredient: Clostridium Botulinum neurotoxin Type A free of complexing proteins) powder for solution for injection; dose: one injection session of solution, prepared by reconstitution of powder with 0.9% sodium chloride (NaCl); total volume 0.24 mL per side, i.e. 4 x 0.06 mL (4 x 3 units = 12 units); mode of administration: intramuscular injection.
Placebo 4-injection scheme
PLACEBO COMPARATORPlacebo to IncobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin) powder for solution for injection; dose: one injection session of solution, prepared by reconstitution of powder with 0.9% NaCl; total volume 0.24 mL per side, i.e. 4 x 0.06 mL placebo solution; mode of administration: intramuscular injection.
IncobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin), 3-injection scheme
EXPERIMENTALIncobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin), also known as 'NT 201' or 'Botulinum toxin type A (150kD), free of complexing proteins' (active ingredient: Clostridium Botulinum neurotoxin Type A free of complexing proteins) powder for solution for injection; dose: one injection session of solution, prepared by reconstitution of powder with 0.9% sodium chloride (NaCl); total volume 0.24 mL per side, i.e. 3 x 0.08 mL (3 x 4 units = 12 units); Mode of administration: intramuscular injection.
Placebo 3-injection Scheme
PLACEBO COMPARATORPlacebo to IncobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin) powder for solution for injection; dose: one injection session of solution, prepared by reconstitution of powder with 0.9% NaCl; total volume 0.24 mL per side, i.e. 3 x 0.08 mL placebo solution; mode of administration: intramuscular injection.
Interventions
Intramuscular injection at day 0, at 3 and 4 injection sites per eye (4 x 3 or 3 x 4 units = 12 units per eye)
Intramuscular injection at day 0, at 3 and 4 injection sites per eye.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- \- Moderate (grade 2) to severe (grade 3) symmetrical lateral periorbital wrinkles assessed by the investigator according to the 4-point scale at maximum smile
You may not qualify if:
- \- Significant facial asymmetry
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (12)
Unknown Facility
Cannes, France
Unknown Facility
Nice, France
Unknown Facility
Paris, France
Unknown Facility
Düsseldorf, Germany
Unknown Facility
Karlsruhe, Germany
Unknown Facility
Munich, Germany
Unknown Facility
Starnberg, Germany
Unknown Facility
Roma, Italy
Unknown Facility
Bexley. Kent, United Kingdom
Unknown Facility
Glasgow, United Kingdom
Unknown Facility
London, United Kingdom
Unknown Facility
Sutton Coldfield, United Kingdom
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
David Eccleston, MD
MediZen, Sutton Coldfield, United Kingdom
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 8, 2007
First Posted
October 10, 2007
Study Start
September 1, 2007
Primary Completion
February 1, 2008
Study Completion
May 1, 2008
Last Updated
March 8, 2012
Record last verified: 2012-03