Study Stopped
Big difficulties to enroll patients
Efficiency Evaluation of Photodynamic Therapy With Photofrin® on Unresectable Type III or IV Cholangiocarcinomas
CK/PDT
1 other identifier
interventional
80
1 country
18
Brief Summary
Unresectable type III or IV cholangiocarcinoma has a very bad prognosis; survival median ranges between 6 and 9 months. Survival depends on biliary drainage quality, obtained by plastic or metallic prothesis setting up in one or several hepatic segments. Radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy didn't prove yet their efficiency on survival. In France, gemcitabin is recommended by the French Digestive Oncology Federation in metastatic tumours, in monotherapy or associated with cisplatin or oxaliplatin (Gemox) for patients in good general condition. Photodynamic therapy has shown in 3 prospective studies - one randomized - with small patient series, a significative efficiency on survival and quality of life of treated patients, in comparison with historical series, or patients' groups whose biliary drainage was in most cases unefficient. A new randomized study, including patients whose biliary drainage is efficient and comparing their becoming when they are treated by PDT in addition to current practice, or only by current practice, seems to be justified. The principal objective of this study is to evaluate the efficiency of PDT with Photofrin® on patients with unresectable type III or IV cholangiocarcinoma.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_3
Started Apr 2008
18 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 5, 2007
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 8, 2007
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2008
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2009
CompletedFebruary 4, 2010
October 1, 2007
October 5, 2007
February 3, 2010
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Patients' survival compared between both groups : PDT and non-PDT.
Study Arms (2)
1
EXPERIMENTALPDT
2
NO INTERVENTIONInterventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Obtention of a written informed consent.
- Patient over 18.
- Patient with a type III or IV (according to Bismuth classification) histologically proved cholangiocarcinoma ; histologic diagnosis must be proved by biliary brushing, bile cytology, endobiliary biopsy under scope control with pediatric pliers, or by cytologic puncture under scan or echoendscopic control.
- Patient with Karnofsky score ≥ 50 %
- Patient with an efficient initial biliary drainage with prothesis.
- Cancer classified maximum T3N1M1, but only with intrahepatic metastasis occupying less than 25% of hepatic parenchyme (according to TNM cancer classification of extrahepatic biliary ducts' cancers).
- Patient capable of fill in the quality of life questionnaire.
You may not qualify if:
- No written informed consent.
- Type I and II cholangiocarcinoma according to Bismuth classification.
- Patients with ASA score 4.
- Patients with clinical and biological signs of biliary infection.
- Patients with a severe visceral disease other than cholangiocarcinoma.
- Patients without an efficient initial biliary drainage.
- Patients with extrahepatic visceral metastasis, except perihilar ganglionic metastasis classified T4N1M+ according to TNM classification.
- Patients whose cholangiocarcinoma has already been resected.
- Patients under or already treated by radiotherapy or chemotherapy treatment for cholangiocarcinoma.
- Patients first treated with metallic prothesis.
- Patients with a contraindication to MRI.
- Patients with porphyria or hypersensibility to porphyrins.
- Pregnant, parturient or breastfeeding women.
- Non menopaused woman without an efficient contraception.
- Patient under 18.
- +2 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (18)
UH Amiens
Amiens, 80 000, France
UH Angers
Angers, 49933, France
H Beaujon
Clichy, 92 118, France
UH Henri Mondor
Créteil, 94 010, France
UH Kremlin Bicêtre
Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, 94 275, France
UH Claude Huriez
Lille, 59 037, France
Clinique Sainte Anne
Lyon, 69 003, France
UH La Timone
Marseille, 13 385, France
UH Marseille Nord
Marseille, 13 915, France
H Metz-Thionville
Metz, 57 038, France
UH Nantes
Nantes, 44 000, France
Clinique du Trocadéro
Paris, 75 116, France
UH Cochin
Paris, 75 679, France
UH La Milétrie
Poitiers, 86 021, France
UH Charles Nicolle
Rouen, 76 031, France
UH Hôpital Civil
Strasbourg, 67 091, France
UH Purpan
Toulouse, 31 059, France
UH Rangueil
Toulouse, 31 059, France
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jean Boyer, MD, PhD
UH Angers
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 5, 2007
First Posted
October 8, 2007
Study Start
April 1, 2008
Study Completion
November 1, 2009
Last Updated
February 4, 2010
Record last verified: 2007-10