NCT00529815

Brief Summary

The purpose of this pilot study is to determine if a Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring System (CGMS) is a more effective method of improving glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes than is episodic self blood glucose monitoring(SBGM) in the both the short- and long-term. CGMS, which includes a sensor that can be self- inserted under the skin and a discrete monitor that records and displays blood sugar levels nearly continuously, allows for real time blood glucose monitoring. This will be a prospective, randomized control trial comparing participants with type II diabetes use of CGMS versus SBGM. The primary endpoint will be improvement of glycemic control as measured by glycosylated hemoglobin (A1C). The secondary endpoints will compare mean daily glucose levels, the number of both hypoglycemic and hyperglycemic events, the amount of time spent in target blood glucose, and the perceived level of diabetes-related stress between the two groups. Participants will be randomized to either the control (SBGM) or intervention (CGMS) group. Subjects in the intervention group will alternate the use of the CGMS with episodic self blood glucose monitoring for four cycles of two weeks during the 12 week study. The control group will perform episodic SBGM throughout the study. The intensified monitoring schedules for both groups will end at the end of week 12, but glycemic control measurement by A1C will continue through 52 weeks. A1C levels will be drawn at 0, 12, 24, 38, and 52 weeks. Mean daily blood glucose levels, number of hypo and hyperglycemic events, and duration of time spent in target blood glucose range will be downloaded from patients' meters periodically throughout the study. The SF-8, a general quality of life questionnaire for people with chronic disease, and Problem Areas in Diabetes (PAID), a diabetes-related quality of life questionnaire, will be completed at the beginning and end of the study. The results of this study may help highlight which blood glucose monitoring methods are most likely to improve patients' ability to achieve and maintain target levels of glycemic control.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
50

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for phase_4 diabetes-mellitus-type-2

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2007

Longer than P75 for phase_4 diabetes-mellitus-type-2

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 1, 2007

Completed
12 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 13, 2007

Completed
1 day until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 14, 2007

Completed
2.5 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 1, 2010

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 1, 2010

Completed
Last Updated

February 25, 2010

Status Verified

June 1, 2009

Enrollment Period

2.5 years

First QC Date

September 13, 2007

Last Update Submit

February 24, 2010

Conditions

Keywords

Continuousbloodglucosemonitoringdiabetestype2

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • This study will determine if a real-time continuous glucose monitoring system is a more effective method of improving glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes than is episodic self blood glucose monitoring in the both the short- and long-term.

    March 1, 2010

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • The results of this study could also provide information on the impact of the two methods of glycemic monitoring on number of hypoglycemic and hyperglycemic events, and quality of life.

    March 1, 2010

Study Arms (2)

1CGM and SBGM

EXPERIMENTAL

Intervention group will alternate the use of the CGM with episodic self blood glucose monitoring for four cycles of two weeks using the CGM and episodic SBGM and one week only using episodic SBGM during the 12 week study.

Device: Continuous Glucose Monitor

2 SBGM

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The control group (SBGM) will be instructed in the use of the Accuchek Aviva glucometer.

Device: Glucometer

Interventions

The intervention group will alternate the use of the CGM with episodic self blood glucose monitoring for four cycles of two weeks using the CGM and episodic SBGM and one week only using episodic SBGM during the 12 week study.

1CGM and SBGM

The control group (SBGM) will be instructed in the use of the Accuchek Aviva glucometer.

2 SBGM

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 80 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Age 18 or older.
  • Known Type 2 diabetes for at least 3 months
  • Diet controlled, on oral therapy, on basal insulin (e.g. glargine), or on oral therapy and a basal insulin
  • A1C levels between 7% and 12%.
  • Able to independently measure and read finger stick blood glucose levels with the Accu-chek Aviva glucometer and the DexCom Continuous Glucose Monitoring device (DexCom DTS-7).
  • Subjects will have attended a American Diabetes Association recognized Diabetes Self-Management Education (DSME) program at one of the WRHCS military treatment facilities (MTFs) within the past five years.
  • Willing to avoid or minimize use of acetaminophen (Tylenol) and all acetaminophen- containing products such as most over-the-counter (OTC) medications during the study period (Appendix 5)..

You may not qualify if:

  • Female subjects who are pregnant, lactating, planning to become pregnant, or without a safe contraceptive method.
  • A1C levels are less than 7 or greater than 12.
  • Subjects who are taking glucocorticoids, amphetamines, anabolic, or weight-reducing agents during the course of the study.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Walter Reed Army Hospital Center

Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20307, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Diabetes Mellitus

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Glucose Metabolism DisordersMetabolic DiseasesNutritional and Metabolic DiseasesEndocrine System Diseases

Study Officials

  • Robert A Vigersky, MD

    WRAMC

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
FED

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 13, 2007

First Posted

September 14, 2007

Study Start

September 1, 2007

Primary Completion

March 1, 2010

Study Completion

September 1, 2010

Last Updated

February 25, 2010

Record last verified: 2009-06

Locations