Behavioral and Physiological Effects of Visual Training
Computer-Based Cognitive Training in Normal Healthy Aging: Pilot Study of Behavioral and Physiological Effects of Visual Sweeps Training Exercise, 2-Arm Model
1 other identifier
interventional
54
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the learnability of a 3 week, 40 minutes per day, 5 day per week, computer-based visual training exercise by healthy mature individuals undergoing normal aging.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_1 healthy
Started Aug 2007
Longer than P75 for phase_1 healthy
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2007
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 6, 2007
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 10, 2007
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2008
CompletedSeptember 11, 2007
September 1, 2007
September 6, 2007
September 10, 2007
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Improvement in visual memory assessment after training or no-contact period.
6-8 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Improvement on at least 1 of the Computerized Visual Attention, Speed and Memory Tests conducted.
6-8 weeks
Improvement on the computerized cognitive assessments.
6-8 weeks
Improvement on exercise-based assessments.
6-8 weeks
Study Arms (2)
I
NO INTERVENTIONNo contact control (NCC)
II
EXPERIMENTALComputerized, SAAGE-designed, visual memory-based cognitive training
Interventions
Training sessions take 40 minutes per day, five days per week for a total goal of 15, 40-minute sessions.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age 60 or older at the time of consent.
- Mini-Mental Status Examination (MMSE) score of 26 or higher.
- Adequate visual capacity adequate to read.
- Adequate hearing capacity.
- Willing and able to commit to study time requirements.
You may not qualify if:
- Self-report of current diagnosis or history of major neurological illness.
- Self-report of current diagnosis or history of psychiatric illness. c. History of psychiatric hospitalization in the past twenty years.
- History of a stroke, transient ischemic attack (TIA) or traumatic brain injury within the past year; or lifetime history of stroke, TIA, or traumatic brain injury that has left residual expressive or receptive language problems. - Fibromyalgia or symptoms of severe tremor.
- Self-report of current substance abuse, including alcoholism.
- Current useof medications with substantial CNS effects. Inappropriate behaviors during screening or baseline visits.
- Inability to perform behavioral evaluations.
- Participant is not capable of giving informed consent or unable to comprehend and/or follow instructions.
- Participant is enrolled in a concurrent clinical study that could affect the outcome of this study.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Posit Science Corporationlead
- University of San Franciscocollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Posit Science Corporation
San Francisco Bay Area, California, 94104, United States
Related Publications (5)
Bischkopf J, Busse A, Angermeyer MC. Mild cognitive impairment--a review of prevalence, incidence and outcome according to current approaches. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2002 Dec;106(6):403-14. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0447.2002.01417.x.
PMID: 12392483BACKGROUNDFillit HM, Butler RN, O'Connell AW, Albert MS, Birren JE, Cotman CW, Greenough WT, Gold PE, Kramer AF, Kuller LH, Perls TT, Sahagan BG, Tully T. Achieving and maintaining cognitive vitality with aging. Mayo Clin Proc. 2002 Jul;77(7):681-96. doi: 10.4065/77.7.681.
PMID: 12108606BACKGROUNDAhissar E, Nagarajan S, Ahissar M, Protopapas A, Mahncke H, Merzenich MM. Speech comprehension is correlated with temporal response patterns recorded from auditory cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Nov 6;98(23):13367-72. doi: 10.1073/pnas.201400998.
PMID: 11698688BACKGROUNDPark HL, O'Connell JE, Thomson RG. A systematic review of cognitive decline in the general elderly population. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2003 Dec;18(12):1121-34. doi: 10.1002/gps.1023.
PMID: 14677145BACKGROUNDScarmeas N, Stern Y. Cognitive reserve: implications for diagnosis and prevention of Alzheimer's disease. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2004 Sep;4(5):374-80. doi: 10.1007/s11910-004-0084-7.
PMID: 15324603BACKGROUND
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Joseph L Hardy, PhD
Posit Science Corporation
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 1
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 6, 2007
First Posted
September 10, 2007
Study Start
August 1, 2007
Study Completion
August 1, 2008
Last Updated
September 11, 2007
Record last verified: 2007-09